Classroom Mafia (New / Newish Players Welcome)

On May 27 2014 03:06 Chromatically wrote:
Are we being legit here or just trolling?

On May 27 2014 03:11 Chromatically wrote:
He can't be legit though, I had the first post which means I have to be town

On May 27 2014 03:13 Chromatically wrote:

Actually, why did you answer this since I was asking sqrt?

On May 27 2014 03:40 Chromatically wrote:
sqrt is literally confirmed town, discuss

On May 27 2014 03:51 Chromatically wrote:
I can't "confirm" him, I said he was "literally confirmed town" which is obviously exaggeration. Then I explained to you why the question was townie to ask, but in the meantime sqrt posted that post, which made it less townie. I explained that in my next post.

On May 27 2014 05:11 Chromatically wrote:

What was my "heavy backtracking" was and why does it make me scum?

On May 27 2014 03:41 27ninjabunnies wrote:


How is he confirmed town?

On May 27 2014 03:41 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
I'm confirmed town.
I asked about coaches.

On May 27 2014 03:41 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
I'm confirmed town.
I asked about coaches.

On May 27 2014 06:36 Chromatically wrote:
1) I would first like to point out that slam, fuba, and mderg have all taken opportunities to say what I'm doing is strange without really pushing any of it.

But, I will explain it because it is apparently far more complicated than I originally thought.

Read this whole page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/450802-classroom-mafia-new-newish-players-welcome?page=8


2) This is obvious sarcasm, as sqrt is clearly not confirmed anything. I was saying that the sqrt's question was probably town in a facetious way to make fun of the fact that he essentially broke the rules.


This was me explaining why the question was more likely from town, because bunnies asked.


This was me explaining that, obviously, sqrt was not actually confirmed town because it sounded like bunnies thought I was actually saying that. It was also reevaluating sqrt as normal people do when they are disagreed with.

I would like someone to explain what the scum thought process behind these posts would be.

On May 27 2014 06:33 Epishade wrote:
I think I'm the only one who thinks Sqrt right now is town. Chromatically probably too.

Here are my thoughts.

Chromatically is saying Sqrt is likely town for asking about the coaches. Though it's not something that I particularly like doing either, I also think Sqrt wouldn't likely be asking about coaches if he were scum. It'd be a good move by Sqrt if he were actually really mafia and was planning on asking that to appear town, but I don't really think that's what happened here. In my interpretation, Sqrt then jokes about his being confirmed town because of his asking about coaches. Chromatically thinks it's a bit less townie of him to joke about being confirmed town, but I can't see a mafia making a joke about it like that.

Sqrt's probably town for me right now.

Chromatically is also probably town, maybe. Idk that he would go out of his way to claim Sqrt as probable town if he (Chromatically) were Mafia. I would think mafia would just care to give a neutral read on Sqrt if anything.

Bunny, you don't want to clear Sqrt. That's understandable I guess. You think a mafia could have just as easily asked about coaches, but I feel a bit differently about it, and feel that it's more likely that a townie asked about coaches then a mafia. No read on you so far.

Alakaslam seems to be pushing a bit on Chromatically and Sqrt for backtracking, but I believe he's making a big case over a joke. I also am unsure of how what Chromatically said implies inherent guilt. Maybe I misunderstood what Alakaslam was saying. @Alakaslam, can you explain your thought behind that again.

Fuba - I put you kind of in the same boat as Alakaslam. I find it hard to understand what you're trying to push Chromatically on. Your phrasing, to me, is a bit poor in this line, "Are you saying that the phrase itself was an exaggeration, or you meant to exaggerate?" As, to me, they both mean the same thing. You say the difference is intent and I don't really follow much of what you said in the rest of your post, "According to him, he didn't mean what he was saying from the start. I find this weird because he followed up that first statement with more evidence to support it, along with the assertion that finding sqrt to be town is "what must be done". He doesn't think sqtr is confirmed town, but says he's confirmed town, gives evidence that he is confirmed town, then switches to saying he's not confirmed town for the only reason that would have made sqtr not confirmed town in the first place."

Don't really have a read on anybody else as of yet.