EPTYuma Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22251 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22251 Posts
On May 13 2014 00:31 kushm4sta wrote: what is the topic exactly? how long is the paper? No kush you can't smoke a scientific paper. | ||
|
Vivax
22251 Posts
What happened last game, as he wanted to bring up, is: I thought he scummy, disagreed, thought I scummy, lynched me. Which is not what is happening in this one cause he's behaving differently. He could as well have said of me I was trying to figure stuff out in the last game. Overall I feel his townread on HF is unwarranted given that his initial arguments weren't good in my opinion (Cav scum for claiming scum, not even sure if it was serious). The other two guys I'm interested in are fuba and kush cause both used "too scummy to be scum"-arguments and I'd like them to spell out what they find so scummy that it's too scummy to be scum about HF and kush, respectively, Fuba said he would reconsider HF if he didn't bring up new arguments for Cav which is what he did so I'll be waiting on that. Taking the subject to thrawn I'm interested into hearing from kush why he felt like giving him that townread when thrawn simply said he wouldn't be posting anything. Thrawn for me is still a wildcard and I'll give him some time but I don't feel confident at all to give him a read at this stage so I want to know why kush does. | ||
|
Vivax
22251 Posts
On May 14 2014 12:00 Cavalinho wrote: Hi. I am back. I am glad to see that my wagon has gotten bigger for shit reasons. Let's get started: Vivax The difference between this game and last game was that you knew my meta of being lynched early and often and for poor reasons, and you still tried to push me under the guise that I was being overdefensive and scummy for "not mentioning you in that post..." whatever the fuck that even means. This game I am being voted because I cracked a joke. That is a world of difference away from being lynched because you picked at some post for whatever reason and tried to make it out as scummy when it clearly wasn't scummy in the slightest. (Though, to be fair, I just wasn't around to unvote you near the time you got totally wagoned, because my read changed later on. Apologies. =/ ) Also, my read on Holyflare is mostly based on meta (which I will get to tonight) and not really based on his early joke case. I get what you're trying to say, and I want to think that you're town for saying these things and bringing legitimate analysis into the thread, but it's wrong and I feel like you're missing some of the pieces of what I'm doing. (Which I will hopefully fix ASAP.) Everyone pretty much found HF's reason to vote you for the scumclaim shitty I think, but his arguments which focus on the follow up were similar to mine, so you can't say that all votes on you stem from the joke. Btw last game you should have realized HF was scum the moment he pushed the lynch on Steve right after my lynch. The timing for posting that made no sense cause no matter my alignment Steve would have been scummy from the beginning in HF's eyes for what he did, yet he pretty much let Steve slide and then started posting cases on him once my lynch was done. Enough offtopic. I do have another question and it's about you commenting so negatively on DSMIC, yet you feel like only giving Judge a scumread. Do you townread DSMIC, why and how? On May 14 2014 12:07 Cavalinho wrote: Here's why you shouldn't vote me: Because you are very clearly not basing your reads on the actual goings-on in the thread. Those first two quotes are clearly centered on me defending myself, and the third one was taken out of context completely. Every bone in my body is screaming at me to try to convince you otherwise, but it's pretty evident that you have no actual compunction to listen to what I'm saying. And also, stop trying to buddy Holyflare. That sickens me. A guy who goes from HF to you as scumreads is scummy but the guy you say doesn't listen to you, buddies HF and takes your stuff out of context isn't? Cause I too thought HF was scummy initially for voting you based off a scumclaim, but your followup made me reconsider so I would view Judge's reaction in this case as natural, cause analogous to mine. | ||
| ||
