data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Yuma Mini Mafia - Page 21
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On May 13 2014 17:55 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: Moar HolyFlare votes pl0x. Case is that he's scummy and painfully obvious about it. Lynch on Cav is bad and you should feel bad if you're on it or support it. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On May 13 2014 14:47 Holyflare wrote: Look at that super defensiveness. Such mafia. Only got 2 votes with 2 days to go :DDD | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
vx70GTOJudgexv
United States3161 Posts
On May 14 2014 07:47 Holyflare wrote:This post states a lot of anti-me stuff and not a lot of anti-cav, the person you want to lynch, stuff. Are you happy with the fact he's so defensive that you're so sure to vote him? I'm doing it based on meta and reasons but yours is utterly based on being defensive without questioning him whatsoever. Learn to read my posts. It wasn't just "oh he's being defensive." People do that all the time. It's that he hasn't done a damned thing other than be defensive all game. The "has not done a damn thing" line was equally important in that post. You know, the six words preceding "besides being defensive." I'm confident in that as a fairly good alignment indicator. Meta is pretty bad mkay. I don't question unless I feel the need to. I don't think I need to. On May 14 2014 07:47 Holyflare wrote: Also, why would I write something that is so obviously false (hay fever thing) and obvious to people that live in America if i didn't do the looking up to make sure it was correct beforehand? Does a scummy person lie about something like hay fever which a lot of people know about? Are people going to blindly agree with me or what? Why is it scummy? Your point about anti-town smurf hunting is so utterly wrong though. Meta = reads = alignments. Whether you think so or not. I'm also confident in my feeling that you're probably going to be wrong more often than not with "meta." Also, I've mentioned having 70 games offsite plus several here, and yet you're not remotely attempting to meta-dive me. Inconsistency. I think you see Dicksmash as an easy lynch target and you're trying to feel that out for down the road. I think you're soft bussing Cav (judging by your awkward attack on me voting him, me being your "scummiest" and you still voting Cav. I think you're trying to set the table for down the road. And I'm pretty sure I'm right. On May 14 2014 12:41 Cavalinho wrote: I made a clear intent to return to the thread with my reads, and this dude just goes, "meh, fuck this guy." With over 70 games on mafiascum of all places, you would think that he knows that being "defensive" and trying to correct peoples' lines of thinking is hardly alignment indicative. ##Vote: Judge lol. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
lol | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Learn to read my posts. It wasn't just "oh he's being defensive." People do that all the time. It's that he hasn't done a damned thing other than be defensive all game. The "has not done a damn thing" line was equally important in that post. You know, the six words preceding "besides being defensive." I'm confident in that as a fairly good alignment indicator. Meta is pretty bad mkay. I don't question unless I feel the need to. I don't think I need to. I think he's done a lot more than nothing since you made that post but you haven't said anything about that at all. If being defensive is not really alignment indicative and activity is then your read surely should have changed on cav to not scummy because he's saying things. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On May 15 2014 04:30 Holyflare wrote: I think he's done a lot more than nothing since you made that post but you haven't said anything about that at all. If being defensive is not really alignment indicative and activity is then your read surely should have changed on cav to not scummy because he's saying things. actually i have the same thoughts about your read on cav. have you taken any recent posts into account? | ||
vx70GTOJudgexv
United States3161 Posts
On May 15 2014 04:30 Holyflare wrote: I think he's done a lot more than nothing since you made that post but you haven't said anything about that at all. If being defensive is not really alignment indicative and activity is then your read surely should have changed on cav to not scummy because he's saying things. No, I've read them, and I've found zero honest attempts to, y'know, find scum. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 15 2014 04:32 thrawn2112 wrote: actually i have the same thoughts about your read on cav. have you taken any recent posts into account? well it's just the fact that in my mind i'm so so so so hung up about the meta thing on me i've kinda got tunnely brain on cav but i don't really know, i CAN see him being town making his other posts but i don't get the towny feeeeeels, i'd probably be hesitant to lynch him today though because he does have a lot of activity even if it's defensiveish and i'd much rather want to lynch judge tbh | ||
| ||