EPTGlory Seeker Mini Mafia - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 00:03 mderg wrote: That´s a bad question. I am trying to figure it out. It´s just that the whole back and forth with you and holy made it more difficult for me. Wait what...? The only way to figure it out is WITH the back and forth. I asked you AFTER the back and forth what you thought of oats and you said no opinion. Then you changed it to he might be scummy but not just based off that one thing. Then you posted saying you were going to disagree with me that oats was scum but oats was making it hard to do that with his posts and now it's MORE difficult to figure anything out with the same information you had before? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 18:09 thrawn2112 wrote: hey i'm back. what's going on? baby come back  | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 06 2014 00:26 mderg wrote: I don´t understand your play right now, Oatsmaster. Why would you state something as fact, if you have no idea about it? Here you realise Oats lied about meta, he later backs it up by saying he made it up to look convincing so other people would lynch me here: On May 06 2014 00:34 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont see what accuracy has to do with anything. Fact is, what convinces me is not what convinces other people and if I have to lie my ass off to get other people to listen, I dont see anything wrong with that. This is directly after what you wrote so you should have seen it. On May 06 2014 01:04 mderg wrote: I was not twisting anything to suit my purposes. I just think it´s stupid to state something as a fact, if you don´t know it for fact. I also don´t think it´s useless to point something out that I strongly disagree with. Even if Holy was scum, your case had absolutely nothing to back it up. Here you ignored the fact that he said he outright said that he LIED to get me lynched, instead you make it out to be him making a mistake. Quite some time later, you display no reason for any change of heart, any reasons to change your mind. On May 06 2014 01:37 mderg wrote: I´m still here, I don´t have anything to add right now. You even state that you have no opinion. So what changed between you thinking that he was scummy but maybe not because it's just one case to thinking he WASN'T scummy in this post: On May 06 2014 09:12 mderg wrote: I was about to post that I don´t agree with holy on you being scum, you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". I´d just call it a bad case based on wrong meta. Incidentally Holy made a case on me in cell mini mafia, also backed up with bad meta reasoning. He was town btw. I don´t like this post, though. What´s with "Mderg is scum too ok for sure."? Some explanation would be good. Lying to lynch someone is imo only fine in very few cases. Not with a weak case like yours, though. You even ignore the part where he said he lied on purpose, which led me to believe you actually HADN'T been reading. Then you got pissy at me for pointing it out. Explain to me what gave you those reactions, what made you change your mind, lay it all out for me like i'm a 5 year old wanting to learn. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 00:54 Koshi wrote: I am tired. I might be off for 12 hours. ~_~ | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
you made a bad case but in no way did you lie "to get a towny lynched by any means possible". when I just proved that wasn't the case | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If you can't convince someone to be lynched through normal means, resorting to lying is "using any means possible" that's not really a far stretch. Which is why it's more odd that you compare lying to using bad meta instead because the 2 are not equivalent at all. Unless you are implying they are. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 01:17 Koshi wrote: HF how are.your Vivax and Oats 100% scumreads doing? Oats not so much anymore, vivax pretty stronk. He complains that he didn't want to argue with me to stop discussion being stifled yet ignored everything i was doing to discuss his point. He returns to the thread with the same points previously but - the oats part which me and oats already disproved and when discussion starts he leaves again. He's talking at us rather than with us. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:04 Vivax wrote: And how does all of this make me scum? I bring my points across, you can elaborate on them or not and if you don't think they are true then you don't have to try and convince me so hard of your own point of view. I have trouble understanding what you're trying to achieve with all your actions. You want me to see Cava's post as townie, I don't think I have to. You want me to acknowledge Oats is a liar and that makes me scum. I use other ways of reading him. And when I don't agree with you and don't want to discuss that with you cause I don't enjoy that, then it makes me scum? Are you kidding? The scummyness is you're portraying ME negatively pre-emptively before an event even happened. "i didn't want to discuss cav's post to stop an argument", you haven't discussed ANYTHING. You sit back post random sidenotes about a read that hadn't properly evolved. You post a case on oats being town and when disproved you decided not to comment on any of it, take no part in the game, ignore everything i write to then return and tell us about cavalinho all over again. You've even completely dropped any mention of oats so i have to assume you actually AGREED with my points on him. You don't listen to any points about anything, there's no reason to believe you even care, you have no substance in your posts. "cav is more assertive as town" proves nothing says nothing, especially when he was assertive in that post and without proof of what you mean nobody has any idea if it's true or not . You don't question anyone, you don't even consider that you might have misread a post because you weren't there at the time whereas the people that were there say the post has a different tone. You are spreading doubt amongst people that are actually playing the game and you are lurking. Now tell me again how that's not scummy? Agenda 101. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:21 Steveling wrote: Can you guys drop this, vivax is super towny. If he's scum he deserves to win. I can't read him as scum. "super towny" "i can't read him as scum" What a hero. Nobody deserves to win if they are scum. Ever. Drop that line of thinking immediately. I've already asked you to explain why you think he is town but you haven't done it. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:27 Steveling wrote: I said multiple times that I find his behavior perfectly normal. That's good to know but we don't so point out specifically with quotes which parts are super towny. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:40 Steveling wrote: I refuse to do that since there are players yet to say anything. Don't get tunnel vision on him. I'm not at all but this post is beyond ridiculous to make. Why do you refuse yet state you don't want me to tunnel vision on him??? I think he is scum and have laid out why. You think he is supppeerrr town, super town enough for you to try and stop us discussing him but REFUSE to post reasons why you think he is town??????? What the fuck man. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 07 2014 02:53 Koshi wrote: Holyflare makes me laugh. ?? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
How has there been like 0 discussion since i left??????? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
The category of doing nothing. Don't be a catastrophe koshi | ||
| ||
