|
On April 05 2014 04:54 Paperscraps wrote:
.bad so is case the when Especially .now stop will I think I .boring so is yourself defending Bleh .inconsistent be cannot players Town .mafia be must I that is this for reason possible only The .Tehpoofter on changed read my Oh
If you get lynched, your item is going to someone else randomly so if it's something that would be dangerous in the hands of mafia or 3p you should say what it does. I'd assume the next person to write backwards will be the one in possession of your item if it actually exists.
|
On April 05 2014 07:28 IAmRobik wrote:We can lynch any of these people. 3. Holyflare 11. kitaman27 14. VisceraEyes 15. austinmcc 16. Amiko 21. Paperscraps 23. Foolishness 26. yamato77 30. Blazinghand
I'd kill amiko the mostest from your list. We should do that.
|
On April 05 2014 07:45 Paperscraps wrote:
.Amiko voted ninja I
Same.
|
On April 05 2014 07:49 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2014 07:47 justanothertownie wrote:On April 05 2014 07:45 Killing wrote:On April 05 2014 07:45 Paperscraps wrote:
.Amiko voted ninja I Same. Then you 2 have some convincing to do. Not that I wouldn't lynch Amiko but you need 15 (!) votes on him or you are just wasting yours. There's no lynch if we don't have 15 votes? Why wouldn't it just go to the highest target? That's so dumb/bad/blah/etc. I can't imagine us lynching correctly then
I mean if there's no traction for killing someone other than Paperscraps, we are FORCED to kill him for information. I still think Amiko is the best kill though. I said earlier I want to kill anyone that really has no reason to kill paperscraps other than for writing backwards.
On April 04 2014 08:24 Amiko wrote:Also, thoughts on paperscraps? Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 08:01 Amiko wrote:Re: PaperscrapsI do not believe there is an item that requires Paperscraps write backwards. Robik mentions that it would be a pain on Daniel ( link), as does marvellosity ( link), and that’s true. Syllogism correctly points out it is easy to automate reversing your posts ( link). But, these comments miss the stronger reason I do not believe him: the burden on the hosts. Hosts who would have to read each and every post carefully to ensure it is properly reverse-formatted. So, I disbelieve Daniel/paperscraps and feel it’s scummy. ##Vote: Paperscraps It's not a case but I think it's a fair reason to disbelieve his reverse-curse writing.
Reasoning: Writing backwards
On April 05 2014 02:28 Amiko wrote:PaperscrapsI posted some comments about paperscraps earlier. I also like marv's point. Here's another thing which I think makes him a good lynch: First, paper is asking blazinghand to be more honest. Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 08:41 Paperscraps wrote:
.run long the in you help will It .though honest more be should You .dude cool pretty a like seem You .friends be should we ,Blazing Later, he seems to want to back off Blazinghand. Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 10:46 Paperscraps wrote:
.moment the at reprieve a warrant to Enough .genuine somewhat seemed me against attack his but ,forum a on "heated" or "mad" being fake to easier is it know I .now for BlazingHand off back all can We
He could be just reading Blazing as a third party (encouraging him to reveal his goals) particularly given his intervening post (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447045-catastrophe-mafia?page=79#1574).
This is terrible additional reasoning for voting Paperscraps. "First, paper is asking blazinghand to be more honest .... and then backs off for no reason". He quotes the post where the actual reasoning is included. "I know it's easier to fake being "mad" or "heated"... but it seemed genuine.
I honestly think he's was just trying to get an easy lynch and start an early bandwagon. The rest of his filter is teribble, being kinda of wishy washy with some of his reads. I have to go to dinner so I can't continue but I hope town considers the amiko lynch as a seperate option.
ALSO PAPERSCRAPS DEFEND YOURSELF YOU SHITTY TOWN. thanks
|
On April 05 2014 08:46 Holyflare wrote:You know this is silly. Counter wagon gumshoe only has 6 votes, this won't go through.
Gumshoe wagon should combine forces with our wagon then.
|
On April 05 2014 08:51 WaveofShadow wrote:What percentage?
Close your eyes and jump ship.
|
On April 05 2014 08:52 Amiko wrote:
If you're set that's fine, but I'm glad to keep talking.
@people in thread
If I understand it, the main reason you are pushing on me is that I voted for paperscraps. Do you think the way that I voted for paperscraps reflects an intent to gather information or to push a lynch?
On April 05 2014 08:45 marvellosity wrote:
are you claiming 3p or not Amiko?
On April 05 2014 08:45 marvellosity wrote:
yes/no or you get lynched
|
Can we do a quick discussion on whether to try and disable the device? Town has the most numbers atm.
|
We should have just lynched Amiko so we could get his role pm and find out wtf horses do.
|
|
|
On April 06 2014 03:42 Tehpoofter wrote:@killing no thanks. Secondly you want to lynch Amiko cause hes 3p? Do you have a scum read you'd like to lynch?
My current scum:
1st Iamperfection
2nd Poofter
Iamperfection: I just re-read him. He hasn't put forth any reads and is always asking others questions on their own reads instead of giving his own. If someone town has a kp and the trade-off isn't bad or something, I would shoot him.
Poofter: I made a case earlier on why I didn't like him. I still don't really like anything he has said since.
|
On April 06 2014 07:47 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 21:26 Tehpoofter wrote:
Yep marv I agree. We can lynch Robik tomorrow
## unvote
## Vote: Paperscrapes Honestly this is the worst vote in existence.
Agreed
|
On April 06 2014 07:48 WaveofShadow wrote:
Is poofter bad?
I get that newbie vibe from him.
Which according to my usual thoughts/reads means we should lynch this fucking guy with fire.
I don't know if he's bad but I think he's playing his scum game atm.
|
On April 06 2014 07:57 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2014 07:54 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 06 2014 07:50 Dandel Ion wrote:
According to his posts this game he is bad, but I dunno if scum bad or town bad
cba to delve into the depths of badness myself somebody else do it. But somebody as bad as you should be able to draw out the understanding of badness from the depths of the bad abyss. We can't have personal attacks like this in this game! 100% unacceptable
Rob, if you don't use your shit on me you're terrible.
|
On April 06 2014 08:34 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2014 07:48 WaveofShadow wrote:
Is poofter bad?
I get that newbie vibe from him.
Which according to my usual thoughts/reads means we should lynch this fucking guy with fire. I'm new to forums but have played a lot of video mafia (I think I've addressed that before) first game this big. I'm better than Joey and Robik at video mafia but they maybe better than me at forum same for paperscraps. I played in Titanic recently and was town if you want to read that filter. My question is you're getting the newbie vibe so newbie=lynch cause mafia? Just clarifying a bit.
Confirmed liar, no longer trustworthy.
|
On April 06 2014 08:56 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2014 08:48 yamato77 wrote:On April 06 2014 08:29 Tehpoofter wrote:On April 06 2014 07:47 yamato77 wrote:On April 04 2014 21:26 Tehpoofter wrote:
Yep marv I agree. We can lynch Robik tomorrow
## unvote
## Vote: Paperscrapes Honestly this is the worst vote in existence. Explain to me how this vote is bad? I saw marv point out a good scummy post on paperscraps that directly related to me. I am familiar with paperscraps play and him going back on a read for no reason is not something I would say that he does often and even more rarely as town. Paper went from "Tehpoofter is townie" to "hey guys attacking poofter thats dumb this is his null game" when I literally didn't post in between.... like what changed his mind? I'd love for further clarification why is it bad or even more so "the worst vote in existence" Well, I don't really see any evolution of thought in your filter about this at all. In fact, I really don't see much evolution of any of your reads. What I did see was you agreeing with marv after earlier thinking he was highly likely mafia or something of that sort. I had suspicions of paperscraps before then as noted in my previous post I had him listed as scummy for other reasons and if you see my read on marv it was an associative read for defending robik nothing really he had done. I don't see how that leap of thought is so scummy. I am curious did you see my post about how I started to evolve on robik?
Is paperscraps your top scum right now?
|
|
|
On April 06 2014 11:27 Dandel Ion wrote:
I would rather one of them claimes the name of the other one.
First one to do it is confirmed town for guarding device.
go
Wouldn't simply guarding the device make someone probably town?
|
On April 06 2014 11:28 Paperscraps wrote:
This game just became ten times less fun, now that Foolishness was killed.
P.S. I can talk normal again.
P.S.S. I will be the hero this town needs today.
What was your item?
|
Are we allowed to use skype or do we have to use tl pm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
