|
On April 04 2014 04:13 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:08 austinmcc wrote:On April 04 2014 04:00 marvellosity wrote:On April 04 2014 03:56 austinmcc wrote:On April 04 2014 03:54 marvellosity wrote:
hmm. Aladdin maybe? The players in this game are Aladdin characters. Who is the carpet and why? Who is the genie, except that instead of being summoned from a lamp, the genie in this case has to be summoned from Europe? Who gets to be Princess Jasmine? Right now, you are the carpet because you are whisking me away from the banality of the thread into a whole new world. Koshi is the genie, except that is a futuristic prediction, because I expect him to come from nothing and poop goodness all over the thread. Palmar is Princess Jasmine, because he has so many suitors bafflingly vying for his attention Is the Jasmine read because "ick, girls" or "ick, brown girls"? You don't think suitors should have been vying for Jasmine? If HF is a magical rules-changing fairy, what's ruleset do you think is the most town-favored to be imported (maybe partially) into this game? She just had money, boring. Although I guess she turned out ok. *crosses fingers*  Too difficult a question for me. If the game is banal, and you are the walking repository of past games, just like...name a thing or two? Agreed on bureaucracy maybe being bad for scum? Do you remember any other games where scum had an advantage/disadvantage to balance, but the advantage wouldn't carry over well?
We did not watch the same Aladdin either. Dem hips.
|
On April 04 2014 04:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:13 austinmcc wrote:On April 04 2014 04:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 04:08 yamato77 wrote:On April 04 2014 04:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 04 2014 04:06 austinmcc wrote:On April 04 2014 04:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I told jat and marv, who were following the last game, that in my opinion they should pay more attention to what i say.
Not that it makes you scum austin. my case is what it is.
It is that you comment on things that you have not thought through. You make conclusions based on something you have not read properly. If you post conclusions on somthing i would expect you to think why people say what they do (in this case yamato and me). You are clearly not doing so, but you are STILL posting conclusions. My comment is entirely thought through. People start the game posting dumb reads to get things going or dick around. Yamato tacks some dicking around onto your dicking around, in a way that I like. He's not trying to get you lynched, he's picking a stupid thing to call someone out on, in a quick and carefree manner. It's the sort of post that comes from a townie. People who make posts that come from townies are likely to be townies. ta da nonono... rofl no. that's not what's going on. see, this is the point of my case. ^_^ Many people have yet to understand our interactions, rayn, it's fine. But hey, the point is this: austin calls both of our reads "nonsense" - at that point my reads were not nonsense because i literally said "i am always serious when i give reads" - now, people who have paid attention know there is something going on with your read on me. he still claims both of outr reads were nonsense..... Your reads were nonsense. You're not the non-nonsense fairy, you can't wave your wand and make everything you say true or not nonsense. DI you around? And i tell you if you call my reads nonsense you are calling me a liar because they were not. So, again. Are you calling me a liar? Yes, gumshoe. I don't care whether YOU think they were nonsense. I assume you're being truthful there. But I think the universe, as a whole, doesn't order itself according to what you think. You can think something, be sure of something, and have it be wrong.
In this case, nonsense
|
Okeedoke. My homosexuality has been ridiculed before, ain't no thang.
If there were a single thing that VayneAuthority does in games to give away his alignment, what would that thing be? If there's not, that's fine.
|
On April 04 2014 04:24 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:00 marvellosity wrote:
Palmar is Princess Jasmine, because he has so many suitors bafflingly vying for his attention I'm okay with this, she's like my sixth favorite disney princess after anna, elsa, rapunzel, ariel and belle. Not in that order (belle is no1, anna probably no2). She's one of the only legit princesses. Or whatever a sultan's daughter is.
Also your list is way too modern. You need to time travel further back.
|
On April 04 2014 06:59 Dandel Ion wrote:
i think somebody had a question for me while i was gone
well im not gone now
so quest <----
Why does kita's "I'm not doing anything" bug you more than other people who checked in and did nothing?
|
If he turns up and does something...you lynch him for lying?
I agree that he's the only one to say it straight out, but I don't see much different between saying it or not.
|
On April 04 2014 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote:
No?
And the difference is intent, and with him that is easy to see, on the other random lurkers it's guesswork to figure out which wants to be afk and which just is. Where wanting to be afk...is bad, but just being afk is null?
And saying you're GOING to be afk is bad, because ... you only say it if you want to be afk, not if you're just gonna be afk?
I don't get how the wanting/just being thing is relevant to stating/not stating
|
I don't like putting you as town super early for "playing", so I want to give myself some other reasoning.
You jumping on kita while not jumping on other folks, VA being the one i remember, was what stuck out to me, wanted to poke you about it.
|
On April 04 2014 07:50 Dandel Ion wrote:
I just told you why.
I don't know if VA is actually afk because he likes being a useless lurker (which he does), or if his family died in a plane crash or whatever.
I know why kita is being afk (or rather "useless" since he did try to spam some fluff), because he said so, and it's 100% sure to be a non-valid reason.
Do you like actually not understand the difference?
I find that hard to believe.
Or do you think being annoying is going to help you read me? I don't think I care about the difference, maybe? Kita saying "I'm going to be afk for part of this cycle" and someone else being afk for part of this cycle are more or less identical to me.
Whatever the difference is, no, I don't get why providing a good/bad reason is different than taking the same action. Or at least, I don't really care about a difference there and then I'm not sure where I'm going. I didn't have a full conversation planned out here, was just curious about you getting on Kita's nuts for essentially saying "I'm not going to be around until later D1." Felt like an overblown reaction.
On April 04 2014 07:56 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 07:46 austinmcc wrote:
I don't like putting you as town super early for "playing" also that's like saying you hate free candy, puppies, people and love. Nah. It's like people disliking Coag and his seal or whatever that business is. Game wouldn't be any fun if everyone had some gigantic tell that was obvious every game. I like fun. If candy, puppies, people and love are anti-fun, I'm kinda...mixed on them then.
|
Palmar scummy for trying to get people to follow false gods.
Kitaman, where do your loyalties lie?
|
On April 04 2014 09:38 sandroba wrote:
I'm town. I'd like some non bullshit reads or insights on syllo, marv and holyflare. Syllo asked me a couple questions about one of my posts. Just a little bit, not the part that popped the most.
Made it appear like he was actually reading thread.
The question he asked and followup made it look like he was concerned about my alignment, trying to figure me out.
Likely town, although I'll admit I have little/no experience playing with syllogism, just a generally townie set of actions.
|
On April 04 2014 09:38 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 09:36 austinmcc wrote:
Palmar scummy for trying to get people to follow false gods.
Kitaman, where do your loyalties lie? Preferably with the deity that doesn't want to sacrifice me. Are you willing to give me a better offer? Dunno. I'm not WoS.
Generally you pray and do stuff to gain a God's favor. Gods don't...fight to curry favor with a single non-God. Myself and any other Gods will be watching you.
Can't figure out whether G or g is appropriate.
|
Catching up and am on 128 so we'll see if this continues but I don't see why Gumshoe is the magical lurker lynch over SUPER DUPER LURKY folks like Djodref.
Who responded super quick to syllo about his read-through, then nothing. And more nothing. And for whoever wants to talk about multiple games, is less than alive in other games, which should yield an increase in participation/activity more than stuff like "people who are alive in other games are posting in other games."
NOT A GREAT ARGUMENT. I UNDERSTAND. But I'm interested in why Gumshoe is specifically a good target over other lurkers. And if it's activity elsewhere, we've already seen RIGHT NOW that he can be inactive as town in other games. So the activity thing is basically a nullity (i'm not going to call someone town for not posting in a thread)
But djo has been on some lists and not on others and is a way lurkier lurker than Gumshoe if you want lurkers.
Hopefully someone else has realized this in the last couple pages.
|
Yes marv, but you're not the only one voting him or halfway-considering voting him.
|
On April 05 2014 09:15 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2014 09:09 Holyflare wrote:
Oh right.
Is there a tl game where tree stumps were used? There was a tree stump in the Dr. Who PTP, Demon's Run.
But that was a player-created portion of the role, and he could un-tree-stump in order to vote once and then finally die.
we've also had a single cycle ghost in at least one game, but I have seen no full on stumps
|
No that IS the post from this game. Has djo actually posted in the QT?
|
On April 05 2014 09:28 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2014 09:20 austinmcc wrote:
Yes marv, but you're not the only one voting him or halfway-considering voting him. we need a majority, we don't need to delve into everyone's reasons when you've not been fucked to turn up until now. There are a number of reasons why I've not been fucked. They don't relate to the game. As far as why I've not been here posting, there are more game related reasons than the lack-of-me-getting-fucked, but oh well.
I'll join for majority on someone who martyrs that hard in an effort to stomp out martyring, or just...saying it's fine to kill you. But I don't get why he's the be all end all option.
|
Joined on gumshoe. Thank you for spreading the gospel of Cyriak, WoS.
|
I don't really see a reason for robik to start lying about his role partway through D1. He had some people on him, but not a majority, and he had defenders.
At least, lying about his role in terms of making up win conditions/lying about win conditions. If you're going to lie about your 3P role or scum role, why not just say you're town. Even if you say dumb stuff about not being killable at night, don't you just say you were joking or say you're unkillable and town?
|
I dunno, some dude who looks to be flipping scum just said you were his buddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
