World Heavyweight Championship Mafia II
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 25 2014 09:54 iamperfection wrote: We start tomorrow. Commence hype building. tomorrow means in 6 hours or in 30 hours? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 26 2014 16:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: Holyflare staph. please just staph and sheep me to scumlynch. ![]() not up to date yet but can you please never ever make another post like this again and just play mafia and stop being so haughty | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 26 2014 20:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't understand why you say this? Me and Holyflare are living happily ever after and nothing else was shit in the first place, no? because i don't like it when people are assholes | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
![]() | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
@palmar you still wanting to lynch rayn? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
raynpelikoneet is used to IAmRobik having crazy reads, they've played before and they apparently know each other outside the game. Holyflare thought that IAmRobik's read was based solely on one smiley in one post in one game and that's very questionable. Then he poked raynpelikoneet for it. Then Holyflare acted very level headed about the whole thing while raynpelikoneet took the douchey approach and it all escalated to levels it absolutely shouldn't have and became annoying and hard to read. I can absolutely see this better from Holyflare's side. IAmRobik's play is hard to understand (he even admits so himself?) and I don't know why raynpelikoneet can't understand that other people might have this problem with IAmRobik's play. I don't think I got anything out of it though because it was just a lot of text and mainly about what I think was a misunderstanding. I'll be around for like another 20 minutes then I'm not going to be able to check the thread reliably until deadline. Will reluctanctly vote Palmar kind of because what marvellosity and IAmRobik has said, the lazy vote and IAmRobik's "tonal read", not even going to try explaining that at all because it's completely impossible to explain. Reluctantly because I also kind of agree with some of the things he is saying. Game is hard yo. ##Vote Palmar | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
##Vote marvellosity | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 27 2014 01:50 marvellosity wrote: So you're actually going to throw your vote away? I guess we'll see? Dunno how a vote on the fastest growing wagon can be a throwawayvote anyway. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
do you really think that a completely random annoyed pprhlzp vote is going to ruin your wagon of righteousness anyway i'm going to be able to check the thread sporadically. i can operate a smartphone. it might not have first priority though when i'm in the dinosaur museum or touring the ep. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
horay! why did "i have something to say but i'm not going to say it just yet" become a big thing this game | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
rayn i think i explained everything i did and if there's something i didn't explain then let me know and i'll explain it i don't do that i'm-not-saying-this-is-a-super-trap-gonna-catch-me-some-mafia-by-being-overly-secretive thing, it's way over (or below?) my level of play. my marv vote was because he was annoying (i also said that explicitly at some point even though i think it was pretty obvious). | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
gone4realz now. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 27 2014 02:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: So do you think he is mafia or not for being annoying? If you think being annoying makes him mafia why didn't me being annoying make me mafia enough to vote for me? i don't think him being annoying points at him being mafia no | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 27 2014 06:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: I dunno. Why should i think you are town? You misrepresent the me/Holyflare argument. You vote for Palmar for reasons i have no idea what they are and then you say you don't really even think Palmar is mafia. Then you say you go afk and vote for marv but you don't think he is mafia. Then you apparently have no scumreads and i see no intention of you trying to figure out who is mafia (like if you don't know who is scum you are supposed to find out by interacting with people). "I dunno" what don't you know? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 27 2014 06:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: It means nothing specific. I am asking you is there a reason i should think you are town? What kinda retarded question is this? Just think you're having a strange reaction to me pointing out you have the same wrong read every single game. You blame it on me and write nervous stuff that apparently doesn't mean anything and now you're super aggressive. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
can someone defuse this situation? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:17 thrawn2112 wrote: you aren';t factoring his "i haven't read my role PM claim"? if it's true then marv's case literally counts for nothing. if he hasn;t read his PM then the only way you can reasonably call palmar mafia is if you do it by PoE PoE? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
if he didn't read his role pm and looks like scum all we know is that he looks like scum and then we should lynch him if he DID read his role pm and looks like scum all we know is that he looks like scum and then we should lynch him he thinks it's silly to invalidate an entire case just because "maybe the subject of the case didn't read his pm", i mean you need to evaluate a case by its contents not by whether or not the subject did or did not read his pm | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
does that mean he's scum or town? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 06:32 Palmar wrote: Too bad I didn't find any. how can you not find any players on your lynch there's a list right of them in this thread and it's literally 7/9 players | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
![]() | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
also we have a doc and he should be on marv | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 17:16 thrawn2112 wrote: i kinda just want to hear your thoughts on things right now in general. like if you have reads, if not, what CAN you tell me, etc i'd probably more like to lynch phagga than you but i doubt that's up to me | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 18:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: It is literally a scumclaim. It's Blazinghand's line from I'm a cop you idiot mafia after he claimed cop and was forced to shoot the real cop on *N0. oh didn't get the blazinghand context at all, thought it was just a frustrated townie outburst | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 18:05 Holyflare wrote: You say 2 wildly differing opinions about what reading his role pm meant, you say maybe he's town for doing everything he did, you don't accuse, your vote never moves off despite you saying it invalidates everything if he didn't read his pm. Fuck prpl you are my lynch you talking about the bolded statements? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
no probably not at all | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:06 Holyflare wrote: the first part you say the outburst was a frustrated town, the second part said it doesn't matter my vote is on him? if you thought it was a frustrated town then you would question it and read for the response or bring it up in his favour and push it saying omg nuu that looks so towny "frustrated townie" as in someone who isn't really a frustrated townie but just acting like one | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote: I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list last sentence isn't a joke | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote: Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke. no don't know your schedule, don't know if it was possible for you to be there or not. i know that thrawn was there and i know you weren't there. that's really it. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote: Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke. marv's case was waaay before you made your list though | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
well okay i said that before i knew there literally was a scum claim. i was still curious about palmar's flip, don't think thrawn would have stuck around if he knew what was going to happen and the thread was empty anyway and generally being around is townie and not being around is not as townie | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
hmm | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
people miss posts both giant mspaint posts and small one liners | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
game solved go next? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
i thought i was passively losing you the game? i mean if it's because of my lack of doing something that we're losing then "actively" is probably not the right word. anyway if i were you i really wouldn't bank on me making drastic changes to my play before this game is over. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 30 2014 02:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: ugh this is exactly what bothers me about prplhz. Like it's not obvious who tram is when there is a discussion between mre and Holyflare about gumshoe about last 20 posts.. it was more like "why (do you call him) tram?" and not so much "who is tram?" | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 30 2014 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well this is interesting viewpoint because why does it matter? because i was curious | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
if you really think that's the case then i suggest you pm iamperfection about it, he had some pretty strict rules in the OP. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
1) "prplhz is not playing to his wincon" you don't believe this yourself or you would pm iamp about it. have you ever seen anyone with my activity get modkilled from any game? ever? no? i have played in a billion games on this forum and i have never been modkilled because my activity is perfectly acceptable, every single time. no host in no game ever would modkill anyone for this level of activity regardless of their alignment (and the whole idea that hosts would use different activity requirements for different alignments and you trying to deduce anything from that is completely senseless). so please stop saying i am not playing to my wincon, it's just a distraction to yourself. even if you think i'm not playing well. i'm not even going to argue with you that i'm not playing well, i'm distracting you who i think is town and that's strictly not good town play. partially distracting marv and rayn as well. i would stop it if i could but i can't. if you think i could play better then why on earth do you think i'm not doing it already? should be somewhat easy for me as sole surviving scum to produce bullshit content don't you think? 2) "prplhz has said nothing" i have a 4 page filter. that's not a lot. i don't say a lot. this game in particular has been hard for me, nothing struck me as particularly scummy especially not in a way i could in any grand fashion communicate to the thread. but i didn't say nothing, i have a 4 page filter. read it and make your conclusions. i voted (one of the first votes for palmar yesterday?) and i gave my opinion to the thread (though apparently not as much as you wanted but there's not much i could or can do about that). if you want something specific from me then i'm around all the fucking time. i just don't see the need to talk a lot because the thread has pretty much been going in a direction i liked all game long and i don't think i've had anything particularly useful to say. the reason i poked rayn about his early read on me was that said he was fairly certain that i was scum because i was shit and that was completely stupid. this is the third game in a row he plays with me and in the first two games he called me scummy for being shit but i was town in those games. why the fuck is he calling lynchbait prplhz scummy for something he knows i do in every single game? his latest case i can totally buy. "prplhz didn't really do anything notable this game so i haven't a fucking clue and it's pissing me off, but still, lets lynch the people who actually did something scummy this game before we lynch him". | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
i just didn't have anything to contribute to your discussion, none of your arguments convinced me that phagga isn't the guy we should be lynching. phagga: i liked his defense (pretty much a straight up refutation) but he's still my main lynch. pretty sure i already said that in the thread. gumshoe: yes i played with him before? one time i can remember, maybe more times that i don't remember. no i didn't read that other game. no i don't think it's likely that they could have done that as scum but maybe they could. thrawn: liked some of his posts but mostly i'm leaning town because of his role-pm-defense of palmar after palmar was already dead. i just have a really hard time imagining a scum doing that. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
It's not because I think you're overly scummy, it's because I think everybody else did something townie and you, not so much. If you are town I get that this sucks for you (and for town) because there's hardly any way you can defend yourself from this. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 31 2014 05:22 thrawn2112 wrote: yeah i'm medic now he's counterclaimed, so now what? ? | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
was last night in denmark | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
was this good play? i'm undecided, on one hand i can see why marv would not think holyflare was scum for it, but on the other hand it's a straight up lie. | ||
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
| ||