|
On March 28 2014 19:06 Holyflare wrote:the first part you say the outburst was a frustrated town, the second part said it doesn't matter my vote is on him? if you thought it was a frustrated town then you would question it and read for the response or bring it up in his favour and push it saying omg nuu that looks so towny
"frustrated townie" as in someone who isn't really a frustrated townie but just acting like one
|
On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke.
i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list
last sentence isn't a joke
|
meh he was angry because i was annoying and then he took a day off from my bullshit and now he sees that i'm playing like i play in my last town games with him so i'm probably town
|
On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke.
no don't know your schedule, don't know if it was possible for you to be there or not. i know that thrawn was there and i know you weren't there. that's really it.
|
On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke.
marv's case was waaay before you made your list though
|
On March 28 2014 19:48 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:48 Holyflare wrote:
Why the hell does being around at the deadline for someone that claimed scum become an issue to point out? lol, quite right.
well okay i said that before i knew there literally was a scum claim.
i was still curious about palmar's flip, don't think thrawn would have stuck around if he knew what was going to happen and the thread was empty anyway and generally being around is townie and not being around is not as townie
|
On March 28 2014 19:50 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2014 19:47 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:43 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 19:18 prplhz wrote:On March 28 2014 19:16 phagga wrote:On March 28 2014 17:52 prplhz wrote:dunno really i think your "wait up people, if palmar didn't read his pm we shouldn't lynch him" was a little too crazy for you to be scum with him though at the same time i don't see what people likes about phagga so much, his interactions with palmar don't seem like something you couldn't pull off as scum. also in this post he's all "meh i dno" about palmar but then here he's all "marv's case is really good", if he think that marv has a really good case on palmar why is his read on palmar then so meh? you were also around for lynch while phagga wasn't and that's bonus points for you and deductions for phagga I wasn't "meh i dno", I said he could be scum for the way he behaves, specifically for not commenting on anything and instead bicker uselessly with Marv. How does my agreement with marvs case contradict that statement? And I'm assuming for now that the last sentence is a joke. i simply just think that "completely agree[ing]" with a giant marv case would lead to a stronger read than what your expressed in your list Agreeing with marvs case came after I made that list. I don't see the issue. last sentence isn't a joke You don't know my schedule, you don't know if it was possible for me to be there or not which makes it a joke. marv's case was waaay before you made your list though I wrote here "up to page 35", marv's case is on page 37.
hmm
|
see
people miss posts
both giant mspaint posts and small one liners
|
can't you at least postpone your dumb ego fighting until after the game
|
then we lynch robik tomorrow and if he's not scum we lynch rayn
game solved go next?
|
|
|
isn't it like 8pm out there on silly island
|
|
|
in case i die i think it's phagga pretty much by poe
|
|
|
|
|
huh, weird, browser froze when i wrote first post so i f5 and wrote my post again but then apparently it got both of them
|
that's an impressive train but why do you have long blonde hair
|
really, that's actually an impressive train
|
i think he's probably last mafia but the day isn't over yet, marv has plenty of time to change his mind
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
