EPTWorld Heavyweight Championship Mafia II - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
so I have no idea. and now palmar comes out with his claim of not having read his PM, which I guess is most likely to be true because I know he's done it before. why am I different? lol, I wish I knew. I think I have this problem where if I play too many games in a row I start forgetting how to find mafia or something | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:12 phagga wrote: You have been bickering with Marv and never tried to put your thoughts into the thread. You were useless over several pages, and that's not how you play as town. Also I completely agree with marvs case on you. you aren';t factoring his "i haven't read my role PM claim"? if it's true then marv's case literally counts for nothing. if he hasn;t read his PM then the only way you can reasonably call palmar mafia is if you do it by PoE | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
yeah give me time | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:24 Holyflare wrote: if palmar hasn't read his role pm then he is pushing marv based on any alignment, what if it's a scum pm? what if he has actually read it? palmar's play this game has been useless so it's no strong leap to go from useless palmar to ---> scummy palmar and it certainly isn't something to paint someone scummy over for making a case on it the bolded part is absolutely true and this also classifies as palmar laying "a trap" (i.e not read role pm so anyone making case on me is actually mafia) is a trap. Which palmar disliked (whether joking or not) earlier on rayn. So do we policy/scum lynch him now? you just told me that it's pointless to think about marv's case becaue palmar hasn't read the pm do you not understand what not reading a role PM means? it means you don't have the knowledge that scum has, it means that you are posting without knowing alignments. if someone hasb;t read their PM then it's absoultey impossible to figure out their alignment other than using PoE as to the policy lynch question honestly i would like to policy lynch him but I'm never able to follow through on those. i'm definitely going to include a rule about reading your role PM in future games if you're gonna even try to figure out palmar's alignment then you must be open to the idea that he is lying about not reading his pm. is that what you're suggesting? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
process of elimination, if you are going to vote for palmar, you need to justify it with one of 2 things 1 policy lynch for him being an asshoel 2 prove that he must be scum because you have town reads on everyone else | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:34 marvellosity wrote: come on sheeples, it's time to get into line. u think he's lying? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:34 thrawn2112 wrote: process of elimination, if you are going to vote for palmar, you need to justify it with one of 2 things 1 policy lynch for him being an asshoel 2 prove that he must be scum because you have town reads on everyone else or 3, that he's lying about not reading his PM | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:37 marvellosity wrote: don't understand what's hard to grasp. do you think palmar read his PM? yes or no | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:42 phagga wrote: Do you think Palmar will not try to play like town if he does not read his Role PM? you're avoiding the main issue for you to take the position you're taking, you HAVE to be telling us that you think palmar is lying abotu reading his PM. there is no other possible way for you to think that he's mafia | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 27 2014 18:45 prplhz wrote: i think what marv means is that palmar looks like scum if he didn't read his role pm and looks like scum all we know is that he looks like scum and then we should lynch him if he DID read his role pm and looks like scum all we know is that he looks like scum and then we should lynch him he thinks it's silly to invalidate an entire case just because "maybe the subject of the case didn't read his pm", i mean you need to evaluate a case by its contents not by whether or not the subject did or did not read his pm the bolded is false and lazy | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
| ||
