|
|
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 27 2014 00:20 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2014 00:18 Holyflare wrote:
In this thread we see players repeatedly doing the same catch up over and over prplhz's was the best though
Troof
|
Just finished up to pg 16. I'm starting to think that Holy/Rayn are just two passionate town going back and forth. I'm flattered that the conversation is mostly about me being a shittastic player.
|
On March 27 2014 00:18 Holyflare wrote:
In this thread we see players repeatedly doing the same catch up over and over
I'm a stream of conscious player and react to what I read as I read it, if I feel it calls for a reaction.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
You need to hurry up and catch up so that you're aware you're sheeping my wagon even though you voted it first. Chop chop.
|
On March 27 2014 00:21 prplhz wrote:
Oh wait, you're still here? How about you comment on something instead of posting sad smilies?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 27 2014 00:24 marvellosity wrote:
You need to hurry up and catch up so that you're aware you're sheeping my wagon even though you voted it first. Chop chop.
You ignore the thrawn wagon too?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
On March 27 2014 00:28 marvellosity wrote:
Palmarwagon bestwagon
this x10000
|
Much hate
|
are we lynching pamlar for a lazy vote or is there some other reason i cannot know?
@palmar you still wanting to lynch rayn?
|
@holyflare i don't understand the thrawn case
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 27 2014 00:45 prplhz wrote:
@holyflare i don't understand the thrawn case
He lied about the reason he voted rayn and lied about when he voted rayn, he said rayn called him mafia but didn't bury him so rayn must be mafia
And then he ninja unvoted rayn with no explanation
|
On March 26 2014 17:49 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 12:39 IAmRobik wrote:On March 26 2014 09:26 Palmar wrote:
Also regarding genuine, no matter my alignment I would always be genuine right now. There is a reason I asked rayn the question, and that reason exists whether or not I am mafia or town. So why do you say I am not genuine? ##vote PalmarExplanation: Palmar is self-conscious mafia, so when he is writing this sentence, he feels the need to add the "or town" even though the sentence actually should end on "whether or not i am mafia" or it should read "whether i am mafia or town". It can't be both. Trust me on this one. I found our first mafia boys! If anything you should conclude I'm town here for not proofreading my posts.
This has nothing to do with proofreading and everything to do with overcompensating and trying to make it so people don't say "oh, well palmar claimed mafia cause he didn't call himself town." That's definitely something I see a LOT of mafia do.
|
On March 26 2014 17:53 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 13:19 IAmRobik wrote:On March 26 2014 10:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:gumshoe, here is how i see it: On March 26 2014 08:29 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 08:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
gumshoe why Robik over anyone else? Do you think you will get an answer from gumshoe that has any chance of moving your read on him forward? If so, what kind of an answer would make you lean one way or the other? On March 26 2014 08:38 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 08:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 08:29 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 08:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
gumshoe why Robik over anyone else? Do you think you will get an answer from gumshoe that has any chance of moving your read on him forward? If so, what kind of an answer would make you lean one way or the other? Over-explained answer could be indicative of scumshoe. He tried to over-explain shit last game (geript's PYP) as mafia and it backpedalled quite hard. He also knows i am a tunnely guy and he also knows my questions have motive behind them so therefore he knows he must answer to me. Joke is a joke, but gumshoe getting possibly scared as scum was worth a try. There is no reason for him not to answer you as any alignment, but I guess it is actually reasonable to think there is a small chance of panic and overexplanation. On March 26 2014 08:53 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 08:41 gumshoe wrote:On March 26 2014 08:38 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 08:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 26 2014 08:29 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 08:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
gumshoe why Robik over anyone else? Do you think you will get an answer from gumshoe that has any chance of moving your read on him forward? If so, what kind of an answer would make you lean one way or the other? Over-explained answer could be indicative of scumshoe. He tried to over-explain shit last game (geript's PYP) as mafia and it backpedalled quite hard. He also knows i am a tunnely guy and he also knows my questions have motive behind them so therefore he knows he must answer to me. Joke is a joke, but gumshoe getting possibly scared as scum was worth a try. There is no reason for him not to answer you as any alignment, but I guess it is actually reasonable to think there is a small chance of panic and overexplanation. Scum can be reasonable as well : P and this game is pretty stacked, mistakes this early on are not to be expected. I'm curious Palmer, what kind of reaction were you looking for out of Rayn, knowing farily well hed have an easy time answering your question as either alignment? If rayn does not have an explanation to his question it makes the question pointless and thus rayn more likely to be mafia. On March 26 2014 08:54 Palmar wrote:
The point being that I did not see how any answer I expected could possibly have revealed anything about your alignment. Let me make myself Palmar for a second: "I don't get why you are asking gumshoe that shit. I can't think of a reason but maybe there is one. Let's see if there is a reason or not. Otherwise rayn is probably mafia. Okay he told me the reason, hmm.. seems reasonable, no need to pursue this further." Everything after that is explaining the motivation behind the original question. Now why is this not an acceptable scenario given the posts i quoted? I mean of course it's possible Palmar was just lazy scum who was not thinking at all and asked useless shit but is it more likely? I can't tell based on these relevant posts so i consider this a null-tell. So if you have some awesome evidence i have missed which proves Palmar was just making shit up for no reason please elaborate. I think you're missing gumshoe's point about this, or maybe I'm misunderstanding...either way -- MY THOUGHTS -- are that Palmar clarified that he asked the question of you to promote conversation. He then reiterated that it was just for the purpose of starting conversation... THEN he said that he ALSO did it because he thought Rayn was scummy. He just seems to be continuously contradicting himself. idk. I don't like you Palmar. PALMAR. I THINK YOU'RE SCUM. Show me where.
I may have misunderstood this post...but here:
On March 26 2014 10:14 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2014 10:08 gumshoe wrote:On March 26 2014 10:03 Palmar wrote:On March 26 2014 09:59 gumshoe wrote:On March 26 2014 09:56 Palmar wrote:
Which questions did I not cover?
And you still need to explain why the magic phrase "I was trying to create discussion" is a get out of jail free card. Not until you answer definitively yes or no. That is the question, the only question I have of you. which one, whether or not I was trying to create discussion? Seeing as I posted as much in the next post after I asked rayn the question I thought the answer should be default, did you not notice that? And no, it's an opportunity to do something that may or may not provide something useful, so yes I was creating discussion and no that wasn't the sole purpose of the question. Do I get to go home now officer? Yeah sure, in case you were wondering about the trap card, I wanted to see how paranoid you were at the thought of a trap, which you weren't really, just sort of indolent towards the whole notion. I has no issues with you as of now. I wasn't wondering about the trap card. By your own definition I am still mafia because I was serious about my question without previously thinking rayn is scum, so how can you have no issues with me? I literally just said that there exists a reason for me asking rayn that question that isn't a) to start a discussion or b) because I think rayn is scummy.
|
I don't get what part of it you misunderstood. Are you not paying attention at all? Gumshoe's entire point is that I never found rayn scummy.
|
like can you bold the part where you think am saying rayn is scum?
|
If I had ever called rayn scummy the entire conversation couldn't have happened...
|
I literally just said that there exists a reason for me asking rayn that question that isn't a) to start a discussion or b) because I think rayn is scummy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
