EPTI guess what I'm saying is "do, don't say."
And yeah, I think you're scummy for saying that and not doing it.
Newbie Mini Mafia LIV - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
I guess what I'm saying is "do, don't say." And yeah, I think you're scummy for saying that and not doing it. | ||
|
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
Now that I think about it, I'm gonna go check our last game to see if OK did the same weird shit he's doing right now. | ||
|
Pixalated
Singapore38 Posts
| ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
| ||
|
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:03 OnceKing wrote: Cavalinho, what do you think of the fact that Robik seems to have an awful lot of reads so quickly? I'll answer your question when you answer mine. | ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
| ||
|
Pixalated
Singapore38 Posts
But instead all he does is make a rather long post asking about potential situations blabla... When I think that it's pretty clear - if we have a solid read we lynch it, if not we lynch a lurker. Seems like he's trying to be helpful without actually being helpful. | ||
|
Pixalated
Singapore38 Posts
| ||
|
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:08 OnceKing wrote: I talked about policy to bring us out of RVS. Your turn. What do you think of the fact that Robik seems to have so many reads so quickly? He has outed two reads. I think that hardly constitutes "many reads." They sound somewhat stretched, but I don't think I'm ready to commit to interrogating anyone on that line of thinking when we have several players that haven't even posted yet. | ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
Why do you need me to answer your question in order to answer mine? Are we playing truth or dare (without dare)? Are you trying to get out of answering questions until later? | ||
|
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:09 Pixalated wrote: If I'm missing something please explain why you think that someone bringing something up to get town to actually discuss something instead of talking fluff = scum. And why asking dumb questions = town. Because it didn't actually look or seem like he was doing that. | ||
|
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:12 OnceKing wrote: Oh and here's another fun question for you Cav: Why do you need me to answer your question in order to answer mine? Are we playing truth or dare (without dare)? Are you trying to get out of answering questions until later? No, I simply felt like you were dodging the question. | ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
sqrt - jokes and one liners during RVS. Lots of 'em. Made no posts afterwards, yet. Mysteriously Robik's got a town read off of that. Valenius - qualification of what I mean when I talk about policy. Robik town reads it, slightly. me - brings game out of RVS and now we're actually talking about things. Robik thinks I'm scummy. ##VOTE: IAmRobik Want to explain this, Robik? You seem to think you know an awful lot. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:09 Pixalated wrote: If I'm missing something please explain why you think that someone bringing something up to get town to actually discuss something instead of talking fluff = scum. And why asking dumb questions = town. Because there's a way that I perceive town approaching a situation or scenario and a way mafia would. I think that valenius's post was in a manner that town would phrase it. Thus a town read on him. OK just posted a generalized statement about lynching UTRs. While the strategy is sound, it's more of a town play to just vote on someone who hasn't posted a lot or someone that hasn't posted thus FORCING them to come and be active. Having said that, I'm sick and tired of talking about the semantics of it. I want to hear people's reads. I want people to put pressure on others. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 26 2014 13:22 OnceKing wrote: If that's the case, why did you insist that I answer first? You could have answered my question and then asked your question again, as I did. Robik gave three very quick reads off of only a few posts. Let's break it down: sqrt - jokes and one liners during RVS. Lots of 'em. Made no posts afterwards, yet. Mysteriously Robik's got a town read off of that. Valenius - qualification of what I mean when I talk about policy. Robik town reads it, slightly. me - brings game out of RVS and now we're actually talking about things. Robik thinks I'm scummy. ##VOTE: IAmRobik Want to explain this, Robik? You seem to think you know an awful lot. I give reads off of minute things I pick up. I don't hold back my reads. I'll clear someone for the most minuscule detail. That's what I do. If that's your reason for voting me that's idiotic. How about you actually give some reads instead of contributing some random nonsense. kthxbye | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
In what world does a mafia come into the game and start talking to himself for 10 posts? Mafia has all the reason in the world to sit back and not do shit and contribute when something is happening and then push some random town who is on the chopping blocks. I don't give a damn if it was 10 posts of filler about how he's doing today and how his HS run was going. | ||
|
Pixalated
Singapore38 Posts
Also what does utr mean? | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
UTR = under the radar = lurking | ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
| ||
|
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On March 26 2014 12:14 IAmRobik wrote: end of page 6: Sqrt is town. He's talking to himself. It's very nonchalant. I like it. On March 26 2014 12:16 IAmRobik wrote: I like this post a lot. Valenius is both interrogating OK and giving answers simultaneously about what reads like genuine beliefs. Town lean. Both of these posts are terrible. Talking to oneself as a joke at game start literally doesn't mean anything about alignment at all. And while it's good that Valenius is asking questions to clarify what OnceKing meant -- perhaps even town-leaning -- there are no "genuine beliefs" stated in this post except to policy lynch inactives in absence of reads, which again doesn't say anything about alignment. Furthermore what is actually wrong about what OnceKing is doing? He said he would preferentially lynch lurkers, everything else being the same, and he's trying to convince you guys to do it as well. That's not a mafia trait. It's probably null; leans very slight town for actually trying to get people to go with him, but I wouldn't clear him off of it. On March 26 2014 12:56 IAmRobik wrote: And yeah, I think you're scummy for saying that and not doing it. And yet he's not voting for OnceKing. Guess what? I think you're scummy for saying that and not doing it. | ||
| ||
