|
On April 01 2014 04:38 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 04:27 Amiko wrote: Gumshoe vs. Slam For people in thread now, why pick gumshoe over slam?
Maybe I'm biased because he picked me ~~~ but it seems to me that Alakaslam is not town, maybe scum, whereas gumshoe is just maybe scum. Why do you believe that slam is not town? Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 04:28 JarJarDrinks wrote: my god people. Aslam gave us a free lynch. He could be scum, he could be SK, and the worst case scenario is we lynch someone who has no reason to help town win. It's autoplay. Why can he be scum or sk, but not town? Why does he have no reason to help town win, ever? Huh? Am I missing something or are you not reading the thread? He claimed non-town.
|
On April 01 2014 04:52 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 04:28 JarJarDrinks wrote: my god people. Aslam gave us a free lynch. He could be scum, he could be SK, and the worst case scenario is we lynch someone who has no reason to help town win. It's autoplay. Idiot. SK =/= Survivor. If you were SK, you could claim survivor. I also said u could be scum. Why not say Scum =/= Survivor?
|
@austin,
why in the world would town fake claim survivor?
|
On April 01 2014 05:14 austinmcc wrote: JJD, still interested in why slam can't be town because of the words he typed
|
On April 01 2014 05:17 austinmcc wrote: Do you agree with me at all? No not in the slightest. He is not town. Town claiming survivor is such a ridiculous scenario that it's not worth giving any thought whatsoever.
|
On April 01 2014 05:17 austinmcc wrote: But I just typed that I am a pig and queztalcoatl and stuff. I don't understand WTF ur trying to say. Are you trying to say that we should ignore what people write? You're not making any sense.
|
On April 01 2014 05:25 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 05:24 JarJarDrinks wrote:On April 01 2014 05:17 austinmcc wrote: But I just typed that I am a pig and queztalcoatl and stuff. I don't understand WTF ur trying to say. Are you trying to say that we should ignore what people write? You're not making any sense. Sometimes, yes. OK, but sometimes we should right? You do agree that we need to read and analyse peoples posts in order to find mafia right? Cause I can't understand why the F you'd keep asking me the same question when you know damn well what the answer is.
Like you can take any case and say "Why can't he be town?". Then when you're answered by someone explaining the reason, you can just use the same argument you made here and say "Well people type things all the time. Doesn't make it true"
|
On April 01 2014 05:27 austinmcc wrote: Does anyone have a reason why gumshoe should not be lynched? Cause there's a chance he's town. There's no chance Slam is.
|
On April 01 2014 05:33 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 05:31 JarJarDrinks wrote:On April 01 2014 05:27 austinmcc wrote: Does anyone have a reason why gumshoe should not be lynched? Cause there's a chance he's town. There's no chance Slam is. who gives a fuck about that. the question you should be asking is "is there a chance X is scum" then you will lynch gumshoe There's a chance that slam is scum also.
|
On April 01 2014 05:32 austinmcc wrote: If nothing else, a townie who thinks he has a strong town role, wants to stay alive until endgame. By claiming survivor and doing nothing, town is less likely to lynch him than other useless folks, and scum is unlikely to shoot him. Instant survival! that's ridiculous. claiming survivor immediately makes him a safe lynch for the town. That'd be the last thing I'd do if I was blue. Puts you right in the spotlight (just like it did)
|
On April 01 2014 05:40 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 05:37 JarJarDrinks wrote:On April 01 2014 05:32 austinmcc wrote: If nothing else, a townie who thinks he has a strong town role, wants to stay alive until endgame. By claiming survivor and doing nothing, town is less likely to lynch him than other useless folks, and scum is unlikely to shoot him. Instant survival! that's ridiculous. claiming survivor immediately makes him a safe lynch for the town. That'd be the last thing I'd do if I was blue. Puts you right in the spotlight (just like it did) Generally, the optimal play for survivor is to say you're a survivor in your first post and then basically do nothing. town will want to lynch you later in the game if they don't win, on the chance you're scum fakeclaiming. but town shouldn't be trying to lynch you D1. survivors, even if they are "safe" lynches, are TERRIBLE lynches for town. Lynching scum is good. Lynching not-scum is bad. Where does lynching town fall on ur scale? Cause if we lynch slam then that can't happen.
|
well hopefully rayn moves to slam @ least
|
On April 01 2014 05:54 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2014 05:52 Vivax wrote: thrawn and kita vote slam and postpone any possible scum lynches we can't be sure of at this stage. It's good play to buy time lynching a wildcard See jjd this is how you do it That's like exactly what I've been saying.
|
On April 01 2014 05:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: Remember kitaman promised to 1:1. You lynch him on D2. No questions asked. switch to slam
|
rayn I wil not vote kita tomorrow out of spite if you let urself get lycnhed.
|
Hey, I should be around for a bit if anyone wants to talk.
Right now I'm super suspicious of Austin. He was around @ the end of the day and votes were moving around like crazy. I don't understand how he ends up w/ his vote on tehpoofter. He totally didn't care who got lynched. He basically no-voted.
|
On April 01 2014 12:12 thrawn2112 wrote: i think we can deduce if the vote changing is mafia or townie based on what effect the votes have on the game
fact: rayn is town fact: whoever caused the extra vote did not claim it (future fact: the voter will probably not claim his vote)
seems like a mafia power to me. You think scum has an extra vote per day? Seems like a pretty strong ability to have. Like they can basically endgame a day early.
|
On April 01 2014 12:51 Tehpoofter wrote: @ JJD did you read his case against me? and his feelings about lynching slam? Yes. I don't think the case against you is terrible. You were on my radar earlier but have mostly fell off since I feel like kita scumslipped about the 2 of us being town earlier.
And yeah I talked to him alot about aslam and I think his stance there is pretty awful. I have no idea why anyone would think slam is town @ this point.
|
On April 01 2014 12:51 Tehpoofter wrote:Do vote powers like that usually happen every night? or is it like vigi that is typically every other night? or maybe one use type deals? I thought about it being a once per game deal. If that's the case then that would make Slam scum since he seemed to be the only person who was in danger of being lynched and I would think they wouldn't want to waste it.
|
On April 01 2014 18:08 Tehpoofter wrote: JJD: He says that kita scum slipped calling me and him town maybe he did and kita is scum but it counts against JJD here because I'm in no way confirmed so how does he know I'm town? I mean maybe he read me as town but I didn't see that in his read... I'm going to read his filter after this and see if I missed him calling me town before that but I don't recall it. Thats my whole point. I don't really read you as town. But I'm treating kita as almost confirmed scum right now. Which means that it's highly likely that you're town since he seemed to have "slipped" about us.
I'm not saying the reason I think he slipped is because I believe you to be town. I'm saying I think u'r likely town because he' scum and he slipped.
|
|
|
|