|
On March 19 2014 08:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also why are you defending Coag? Is there a reason why he needs defending Koshi?
I think that you should put a scummy mark next to Coag his name for that post if you feel the need, but not continue hammering same subject.
I am defending him because I feel that that 1 post is bringing him too much pain. And I don't feel the post is actually that scummy. It might be just sillyness he wrote down.
But sleep calls. My head is also heavy. Maybe tomorrow I will think different.
|
On March 19 2014 08:51 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:49 Coagulation wrote:bullshit. YOU were refering to "NOTEWORTHY" Bullshit bullshit On March 19 2014 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point. On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour? There is nothing about DP HERE AT ALL "WHAT DO YOU CALL IT" IS REFERING TO NOTEWORTHY. NOW YOU JUST GOT CAUGHT IN A LIE. He is CLEARLY referencing my observation about rayn in that post. reading the thread is useful.
What the fuck are you talking about
HE SAID "PALMAR" "WHAT DO YOU CALL"
In reference to the "Noteworthy post" Palm made
This has nothing to do with you DP
|
On March 19 2014 08:47 Giggletummy wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote:
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote:
If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote:
pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote:
You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement- replying for reasons
Also what is this?
|
I'm just waiting for Banks to get his ass in here and draw something.
|
On March 19 2014 08:56 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:47 Giggletummy wrote:On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote:
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote:
If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote:
pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote:
You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement- replying for reasons Also what is this? It is me noting something for reasons. Will discuss later, want to talk to Flare
|
I also want to talk to Flare
pls respond 
|
On March 19 2014 08:58 Giggletummy wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:56 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 08:47 Giggletummy wrote:On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote:
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote:
If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote:
pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote:
You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement- replying for reasons Also what is this? It is me noting something for reasons. Will discuss later, want to talk to Flare
Do you enjoy reading the Coag discussion? What is your opinion on it?
|
Ok so does anyone else besides koshi find rayns "coags super scummy post" absolutely fucking horrible town play for an hour into game? Does anyone not find it odd that hes gonna tunnel on something thats pretty clearly throw away logic so fucking early in the game?
So what I made an observation about why rayn could be construed as scummy and noted that It has no base.
WHO FUCKING CARES.
god.
|
On March 19 2014 08:53 Coagulation wrote:
SO Rayn you get to pick an answer
A) Was it already clarified at that point and you made a useless fluff POST that your gonna pretend you didnt make now.
OR
B) You just told a lie about it being clarified at that point when its pretty fucking clear that wasnt your mindset at the time and now your backtracking.
PIck one.
Don't twist my words around.
There was no bandwagon starting on me. I never thought Palmar was as town, or as mafia, trying to start a bandwagon on me. DarthPunk had already clarified he didn't think me not posting is not alignment indicative. Palmar said he made an observation. I asked him what he makes out of the observation and why did he feel the need to tell the thread he made an observation i didn't think was useful or even good (DarthPunk's post).
So where the fuck is the lie?
Stop vomiting shit and answer me where are the posts that made you think there is a bandwagon forming on me.
I guarantee you otherwise you get lynched because all you do is spew shit out of your mouth, or fingers.
|
On March 19 2014 08:55 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:51 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 08:49 Coagulation wrote:bullshit. YOU were refering to "NOTEWORTHY" Bullshit bullshit On March 19 2014 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point. On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour? There is nothing about DP HERE AT ALL "WHAT DO YOU CALL IT" IS REFERING TO NOTEWORTHY. NOW YOU JUST GOT CAUGHT IN A LIE. He is CLEARLY referencing my observation about rayn in that post. reading the thread is useful. What the fuck are you talking about HE SAID "PALMAR" "WHAT DO YOU CALL" In reference to the "Noteworthy post" Palm made This has nothing to do with you DP
You have to explain this entire thing much better, and from the beginning. You just called Rayn out for lying which means we should be lynching him. If you are CORRECT that he is lying you need to demonstrate how, so the rest of us can follow. I don't understand your point at the moment. You clearly have a strong conviction he just lied, so I want to understand your thought process.
|
You can't really claim something like that and back off.
|
He is saying you already clarified you were not trying to lynch me (which is not true as you didn't really say so) and now i am saying that was the case. Which is a straght out stretch because that's not the point in the first place.
|
Like he is saying i thought you were trying to lynch me and now he is twisting it so that i am lying because now i am saying i didn't know if you were lynching me or not because of the post he quoted.
Fucking shit, explaining this is so hard because Coag twists everything into oblivion. He is mafia.
|
On March 19 2014 09:00 Palmar wrote:I also want to talk to Flare pls respond Let's flash the HF symbol in the sky
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2IqG832.png?1)
On March 19 2014 09:01 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:58 Giggletummy wrote:On March 19 2014 08:56 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 08:47 Giggletummy wrote:On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote:
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote:
If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote:
pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote:
You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement- replying for reasons Also what is this? It is me noting something for reasons. Will discuss later, want to talk to Flare Do you enjoy reading the Coag discussion? What is your opinion on it? I do not enjoy it and have started "heavily skimming" all coag <--> rayn stuff.
rayn looks worse for it, because rayn can be useful when he's bouncing all the walls and accusing everyone of being mafia. I assume that I'm not the only one who is now "heavily skimming" his posts when they involve coag and coag things.
I don't actually follow who coag is this game (coag, coag/kush, coag/kush + more?). But he's posting a bunch so even if it's this fight with rayn that makes me happy. Double standard ftw
|
Exactly my thoughts.
I am not skimming rayn atm cuz he is rayn and I need to keep up with him cuz we will be super duper scumfinding bros but I am not anymore interested in finding out what Coag means with his posts. I am simply not going to lynch Coag.
|
Well I thought my post implied nothing about your alignment as the post I quoted from DP did not make any conclusion about your alignment. It was a post about DP, not you. I clarified a few posts down that I did not think it said anything about your alignment.
So it's a reasonable assumption that I wasn't trying to lynch you.
So Coag's lie is:
Palmar said he wasn't trying to lynch rayn
Rayn says palmar was trying to lynch rayn (where?)
?
|
GiggleTummy is also mafia.
|
And I want to point out to rayn that more people will find share this opinion. For some reason DP and Palmar don't. Maybe that reason is that you actually found something better to why Coag is scummy but you are repulsing others to read your stuff.
#truestory
|
This post
On March 19 2014 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point.
and this post
On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour?
are contradictory
Maybe im missing something but it looks like a lie.
w/e Rayn have fun lynching the most active person in this game that is not only trying to uphold logic but also fucking damn near confirmed TOWN (and you fucking know it) cause I posted my seal.
Im going away till I cool off and maybe when i come back if rayn isnt fucking tunneling me while still completely ignoring the rest of thread I might consider actually contributing again.
|
On March 19 2014 09:11 Koshi wrote:
Exactly my thoughts.
I am not skimming rayn atm cuz he is rayn and I need to keep up with him cuz we will be super duper scumfinding bros but I am not anymore interested in finding out what Coag means with his posts. I am simply not going to lynch Coag.
Rayn is MY super townie friend tho.... Jelly.
But yeah. I don't understand how you could NOT want to lynch coag after all this nonsense. Ragin is not a good reason and he has been bullshitting continuously since the initial pressure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
