|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote.
This question is also relevant to 3/4 of the thread you know. I read that coag post completely differently though. What is interesting to see is how it was pointed out that dp being overdefensive was scummy (by coag) but then they completely went over the overdefensive line in response to you.
|
How did he go overdefensive? Show me pls.
|
On March 19 2014 08:30 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. This question is also relevant to 3/4 of the thread you know. I read that coag post completely differently though. What is interesting to see is how it was pointed out that dp being overdefensive was scummy (by coag) but then they completely went over the overdefensive line in response to you.
I deal with the rest of the people later. Now i am talking to Coag.
|
On March 19 2014 08:23 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:21 Palmar wrote:On March 19 2014 08:16 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:06 DarthPunk wrote:
Rayn you say that he provides no insight of his own. Would you not say that calling it null is not an insight? Like it is a irrelevant conclusion but it is still a conclusion. The point is he just drops a comment that's non-alignment indicative towards every direction. There is nothing, the post achieves nothing and is designed to achieve nothing. If that's kush he is mafia. nope Its coag and the fact that ITS AN HOUR INTO THE FUCKING GAME WHEN I MADE THE COMMENT DOESNT STRIKE YOU AS A LITTLE FUCKING EARLY TO BE MAKING INDICATIONS OF ALIGNMENTS.No of course not cause your more interested in SELLING BULLSHIT than fucking reasonable reads. I once forced a no lynch to defend a townie based on a post he made less than 5 minutes into the game. There is no time wrong or right for making alignment calls. Right palmar but im not gonna "MAKE SHIT UP" to hear myself fucking talk like rayn over here.
Sure, but why don't you explain what your thought process is. You basically answered a question directed at me without considering there may be a reason behind rayn's question. I'm pretty sure rayn had almost no interest in what I thought of his alignment based on that post, but what he really wanted to know was to check if my thoughts on that post are genuine. You however answered the obvious part of the question (ie: can we read rayn based on that post) which means you ignored the point of the question that was being asked.
|
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive.
|
On March 19 2014 08:30 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. This question is also relevant to 3/4 of the thread you know. I read that coag post completely differently though. What is interesting to see is how it was pointed out that dp being overdefensive was scummy (by coag) but then they completely went over the overdefensive line in response to you.
That would be a good point, but then they are a 5-10 head hydra so contradiction can be explained away for that reason. Which is why we should just policy lynch him/ vig him and be done with it.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:31 Koshi wrote:
How did he go overdefensive? Show me pls.
The massive caps lock post? The point by point defense in red?
|
On March 19 2014 08:32 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:31 Koshi wrote:
How did he go overdefensive? Show me pls. The massive caps lock post? The point by point defense in red?
On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote:
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Coag just sign your posts plz
|
Coag got mad, which seems to be for some reason the new standard on TL when someone calls you scum. Just get really fucking mad.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
But koshi that is overdefensive. He should know people are wrong about him and realise they are making up shit and then people idly sheeping look scummy as hell but the over paranoia of everyone thinking you are scum is scummy though.
|
On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote.
of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit.
and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me.
I dont give a shit what you do with your vote.
|
Well, it is a bit over the top. But faking anger (or showing it) works as town on TL. I did it in survivor because I knew it would get the pressure off me and as town that is also important. The difference here being that it is really early in the game but still.
I am not sold on coag scum atm at all.
|
On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote:
The red reply thing? That was good.
3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply.
rayn kept up pressure.
Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive.
Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive.
On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote:
If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said.
On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote:
pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush.
For this post:
On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote:
You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah.
I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be.
|
Now this is really fucking easy.
I make a case which is that Coag made a post that is completely useless and has no intention to figure out who is mafia.
Coag tells me i am selling bullshit.
I ask him what did his post try to achieve in terms of moving the thread forward or scumhunting.
If Coag is town he has an answer to my question and he will tell me what he was trying to achieve with the post. If he does not have an answer he is mafia because i can't possibly be "selling bullshit" because then his post in fact is bad and does not try to achieve anything, which is my case.
|
On March 19 2014 08:35 Holyflare wrote:
But koshi that is overdefensive. He should know people are wrong about him and realise they are making up shit and then people idly sheeping look scummy as hell but the over paranoia of everyone thinking you are scum is scummy though.
Who idle sheeped that case? please provide a link and an explanation.
|
On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote.
What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop?
|
Oh look, it's this thread!
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/sUATQwB.png?1)
HF, do you believe, right now, that DP is mafia?
|
On March 19 2014 08:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now this is really fucking easy.
I make a case which is that Coag made a post that is completely useless and has no intention to figure out who is mafia.
Coag tells me i am selling bullshit.
I ask him what did his post try to achieve in terms of moving the thread forward or scumhunting.
If Coag is town he has an answer to my question and he will tell me what he was trying to achieve with the post. If he does not have an answer he is mafia because i can't possibly be "selling bullshit" because then his post in fact is bad and does not try to achieve anything, which is my case.
I just fucking told you what I tried to achieve. "disarming possible shit logic bandwagon before it gets a chance to grow"
|
On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote:
rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop?
the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
