EPT[M][T] Foundation Mafia - Page 17
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 22:03 Dandel Ion wrote: Wrong, I said I would stay on templar when he had a very good shot at getting lynched still. I mean the main reason I said that was because I didn't think I would be back in time for the deadline, but point stands. IIRC he was only one vote behind the voteleader at the time. The rest, well it's just a summary of what I did. It doesn't make me scum that I did stuff. IN FACT, it makes me super incredible confirmed town that I did anything. At all. ahahahah this is 100% true  | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Les Mafia: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/410972-les-mafia?user=Dandel Ion NWM: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/418049-nuclear-winter-mafia?user=Dandel Ion (he replaced out after D1 but still, there is D1) | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 22:09 Grackaroni wrote: Lol Rayn you are usually a stickler for vote justification. You don't think Dandel Ion's actions are even remotely strange? I think Dandel is one of the easiest players to meta on TL and i can't believe he is mafia in this game based on meta. I don't think his vote on D1 was too suspicious, yes, it was strange, but i find people who bitched about the D1 lynch more suspicious / hypocrite than people who straight up admit they were wrong / didn't do enough and don't twist shit regarding D1. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Do you think both mafia were on VE or not? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 22:17 justanothertownie wrote: Can't be directed at you. I think this goes to robik et al It was directed to Grack regarding my post before the quoted one. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
bad me. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 10:10 Alakaslam wrote: So See vote thread. RAYN DEFENSE THYSELF WASSUP WITH YOU DEFENSE KILLING BRO U DEFENSE KILLING BRO I think it has something to do with this. I just have no idea what lol. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 09:00 justanothertownie wrote: Ok, the case checking has become a full filter read on rayn. I have to be insane. I am still not 100% sold on him especially because of things like this: (1): Holy shit is that bad. Especially if you are grilling people for contradictions all the fucking time. I can see where he is coming from regarding templar but I don't know if I want to lynch that guy over Grack atm tbh (I don't understand why rayn is defending Grack all game). I don't remember this to be Gracks townplay. (2): General complaint: Rayn, your new case on templar reads more like a summary of what he did than an explanation for why he is scum for the most part (I know it can be figured out what you mean usually) and I am not a fan of linking posts instead of quoting them. It makes it harder to follow your thought process. Situation right now: Would lynch into Grack/Templar. A couple of things: 1) I don't "grill people for contradictions". I grill them for shit that does not make sense to me from town perspective. I know townies contradict themselves all the time and i didn't see any scum motivation for Killing to say what he did about boone. If you think that makes me mafia fair enough, but it doesn't. That was my opinion and apparently i was wrong. 2) That's not true JAT. If you read my post i have pointed out clear leaps of logic in Templars posts. I pointed out stuff that does not make any sense from town perspective. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 22:35 justanothertownie wrote: Maybe. But what I see in this quote is you defending a mafia with weak and suspicious reasoning. Anyways you should probably discuss this with slam since he is the one voting you for it. You are not my lynch for today. Also i gave a clear reasoning why in my opinion Killing's post did not make sense from mafia perspective. Agreed? So if you think i am scum for that why don't you then say so? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 22:38 justanothertownie wrote: Fair enough, but you don't want his vote to end up there, do you? Of course i don't. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 11 2014 22:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because being wrong does not make anyone mafia and my my resaoning is not suspicious unless you want to point out why, then we can discuss it. Like I really hate when people do this. Killing's alignment does not make my post any less townie/scummy. Because i gave a clear reasoning why i said what i did. If people want to call me mafia for that post they should have done so right after i made the post, not after Killing flips mafia because the flip is IRRELEVANT. Being wrong =/= mafia and i would hope people would learn that at some point.. | ||
| ||
