EPT[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:14 suki wrote: Puppy <3 Yes. Actually. There is no downside to having your vote on someone else, especially this early in the game. Why is Rayn abstaining from even the miniscule amount of pressure a random vote has, and why does he think that abstaining is a good idea? (Rayn does that clear up my question for you) I see what rayn was thinking though. He thought the votes were permanent thus the people with 3 votes would be easier to lynch whereas the people with no votes would be much harder to lynch. That would actually be a cool mechanic. Once it was cleared up though it basically means nothing so the "plan" doesn't do anything. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:13 VIVAX420 wrote: wait so you are implying that scum is going to be afraid of the default votes enough to come up with a plan like that? ##vote toad im not playing i want this addressed. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:17 Koshi wrote: rayn, do you see any suspicious people or are you too busy with the thing with the standard votes that I don't understand. not really, no. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:18 VIVAX420 wrote: ##vote toad im not playing i want this addressed. Wagon of justice! | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:17 suki wrote: Koshi you should put your vote back on Balla. I really shouldn't. I know we catch Balla ezpz if he is scum anyway. No need to pressure for no reason. Unless you want to share a reason. I think you should. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am taking no stance because there is no stance to take atm prplhz. If you are seriously saying you think someone is scum at this moment you are lying. Pressuring people is fine but what you are accusing me of is a straight out stretch. But who cares where your vote is at, why even bother to implement a plan that allows people to do nothing. No, I don't expect people to have big scum reads right now but that doesn't mean we need to implement a plan to virtually unvote in an unvote free voting system. It just serves absolutely no purpose. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:21 prplhz wrote: But who cares where your vote is at, why even bother to implement a plan that allows people to do nothing. No, I don't expect people to have big scum reads right now but that doesn't mean we need to implement a plan to virtually unvote in an unvote free voting system. It just serves absolutely no purpose. Well apparently you care where my vote is at? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:13 VIVAX420 wrote: wait so you are implying that scum is going to be afraid of the default votes enough to come up with a plan like that? somewhat. Not really the votes themselves but rather some reaction caused by those votes. It's not going to be just about the innitial votes, it's going to be for the entire game that you can't unvote. Noone is taking these votes serious and I see no reason why he should be thinking about this if not for some weird paranoid reasons. And I'm doing vocabs right now... I'm only going to f5 every 15 minutes or so... | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:22 suki wrote: Balla is completely in policy talk mode and hasn't even tried to pressure anyone or start anything even though he is clearly here. He also is not playing light hearted like in the previous game where we bulldozed scum. So is everybody else, only person that is trying to start stuff is prplhz. I don't see anything else that is pressurable like I have in the past 2 games. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: prplhz did you even read my posts? Yes. You are unhappy that you can't unvote so you propose that instead of unvoting people should just vote for themselves. I don't know why you think it's a problem that people can't unvote, if anything that's a plus for town. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:21 Palmar wrote: I would support policy lynching the smurf btw. Let's play "Who is the Smurf" I think DarthPunk and marv knows it. | ||
| ||
