Yes actually, they are ignored because all I've been hearing is "VE hasn't done shit this game".

Marv why don't you talk to me a little bit about Yamato. I raised a couple of points earlier that gosh, I'd REALLY like your input on, but you're too busy browbeating me for being frustrated that NO ONE IS EVEN TRYING TO SEE MY CONTRIBUTIONS.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 01:43 GMT

#1895

I don't know what you are Grack. I've been quite explicit in that.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 01:43 GMT

#1896

I feel like Wave is trolling me.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:37 GMT

#2027

##Vote: VayneAuthority

I can do this today.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:42 GMT

#2028

Not gonna respond to Keir case because there's a lot of words there saying "VE hasn't done much". I can't contest that claim, so rather than respond to it I'll just do stuff. Reasonable? I thought so too.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:44 GMT

#2030

I mean, no? I wasn't a geript fan before, and a case on me kinda makes him off limits to me doesn't it? Was gonna try and find non-Keir scum.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:45 GMT

#2031

I think it's ever-so-slightly better than Risen's case on me based solely on effort required?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:50 GMT

#2034

I'll say one thing about the sentiment to lynch me then I'm moving on.

You asked me yesterday who I thought would have been nominated if 3 townies were nominated. I included myself because I find myself to be a highly desirable mislynch for scum. I do not think it's a coincidence that two people have voted for me today. I think the rayn lynch is clear of scum for this reason - because of the three of you guys, rayn would have been the most likely person to agree to lynch me /this/ phase. I'm moving forward with this in mind.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:55 GMT

#2036

Well it's been a while since I've played with any seriousness with Keir and my play HAS been lacking this game marv, so I don't know what you want me to say about Keir. It's not like he's wrong about my play, he's just wrong about my alignment.

I said before, it looks slightly better than Risen's case on me because of the effort required. And it is literally all he's done this game after catching up. Very fleeting comments on anything else. I guess THAT strikes me as odd - no observations about the nominations, no comment on anything else suspicious from his readthrough....just case on VE and sleepytime.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 16:57 GMT

#2038

On February 13 2014 01:53 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

Key words. pls respnond VE

I need you friend.

:/

You know that when you're nice to people after being jerky to them for like, ever, that comes across as suspicious right? Like, I'm fighting pretty serious urges right now to tunnel you for being so reasonable with me after my play this game.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:00 GMT

#2042

On February 13 2014 01:57 marvellosity wrote:
meh. I guess what I was getting at was this.

Does it look like a case made on you because it's super easy to make a case on you because your play has been "lacking" and he's just picking up on these aspects blindly because it's convenient to do so

Or does it look like he's genuinely thought about what he's brought up and why it makes you, VE, mafia, instead of town

Or is the truth perhaps somewhere in between and you can't tell

I can see a town-Keir believing what he wrote about me - I'm just not sure if I believe that a town-Keir would have written about me exclusively after catching up from a whole game.

The truth is I don't know and I'm afraid my viewpoint is biased because of the case against me.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:02 GMT

#2045

Or you're wrong. Pretty sure you've been mean to me because you're wrong and you think I'm scum and I'm not. For the sake of completeness.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:06 GMT

#2048

They're having a perfect game so far Grack, what reason would they have to give up?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:07 GMT

#2050

On February 13 2014 02:07 Grackaroni wrote:
Well I'm one of the more heavily involved players in this game right now and all I do is post one liners.

So? Not posting /= giving up. They could just be content with where the thread is right now.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:09 GMT

#2052

If you think it's the first one Grack, then why are you voting for Holyflare instead of Keir?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:11 GMT

#2055

I'll look with you. I've been meaning to look at Holy myself.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 12 2014 17:22 GMT

#2064

I think I was there - I was scum, and I was pretty happy about it.

Holy's Cora case is weird. Like he makes this big show of putting a bunch of filters up of different games of Cora's, but then never quotes any of the posts from those games as evidence of anything...in fact only barely even mentions the content of any of them. Just lists them, says his play feels more like scum Cora and proceeds to use evidence from /this/ game to support his claim. It seems to me if he's really doing research on the matter, there would be corroborating quotes from Cora's scum games backing up his claims. He then refers to the post later saying "based on research" when there was no actual research in the post in question, just observations about his play this game. It's all really odd and something I kinda glossed over because of the size of the post earlier.