|
On February 05 2014 11:58 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
Suki's case was bad though, it all hinged on the point that I thought objecting to koshi's policy was scummy. Which I never said. All I said was that it was what I thought koshi was doing if he was town.
Hopeless, why are you playing scummily different from the past 2-3 games? Can you please post what you are referring to. Quote some stuff from his entrances in this game and the other games. Compare and contrast for us please. It's annoying that you think we will go find it (not saying I won't but I can't say the same for everybody else). I already asked you to do it. If it's good information then bring it forward, or are you just BSing?
Im on my phone. What annoys me is that you apparently dont care about hopeless's alignment. You could check on hopeless' games and then make a decision and see what I say. But no, you want to be spoonfed anything. Do you think hopeless is particularly town? If not, why are you indirectly defending him?
|
On February 05 2014 11:49 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:23 JonnyLaw wrote:On February 05 2014 11:17 jaybrundage wrote:On February 05 2014 11:10 JonnyLaw wrote:On February 05 2014 11:05 Balla24 wrote:
I'd lynch LoneMeow. That's fine. I want to talk about Jay. He's actually here. Both times I question him about something he comes in with a town-like response to the questions. Jay refuses to do that until there's pressure on him though. How is this town behavior? I find this funny. Should I come up with a scum like response? Also you do realize that I was making that case before you posted your "pressure" on me. I'm trying to talk to you Jay. You called Suki scum twice then change your mind once she posts a case on Oats. What do you think about Oats? You claim to like the case but don't say anything else. I want to know why. You've played with Oats before this game. We can chat about Lonemeow after this if you'd like. For now, I'm curious about some of your opinions. Yes I thought suki was scummy before. Her thing about not calling Jonny scum but interesting or what ever word she used did bother me. She just seemed to have no point to your posts. However with her case on Oats it showed that she wasn't just trying to appear to be posting. She actually was analyzing the game and looking for scum. So my read turned on her. Is it possible she's scum that noticed she was getting heat and decided to post a case? Sure possible. But I think the most likely possibility at this point is town. I don't remember Oats too well in my previous games. He was never someone I really suspected. He can be hard to draw a bead on sometimes. Not a huge poster mostly short clip comments. I even had to go back and look briefly at the LoL PYP game. I think the case made good points I hadn't noticed before. Oats was not on my lynch list before Suki posted her case. And she made a good enough case for me to consider lynching him. Also I felt the reason to make my own case because I want to contribute to the town. I didn't plan to just sheep Suki's read and just say yea I like all this Ill join. Because I wanted to post my own analysis I got's me an ego you know. Also by posting other scummy people we can choose as a town who we want to go for based on the information we have.
You don't need to sheep Suki. Post your opinion. "I like this part and I don't like this part." You're trying to tell people how to play and what to look for and then you have that post. You flip on Suki and at the same time aren't trying to convince people how to play the game anymore.
##vote Jaybrundage
|
On February 05 2014 12:00 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:56 Oatsmaster wrote:
Oh man jay why are you so concerned on what people think about you? The first step to playing town is to show your innocence. If people think your innocent then your one less mislynch and people will be more likely to listen to you. Like in LOL PYP I thought supersoft was scum on like day 2. But I couldn't convince anyone to vote with me. After the game someone mentioned to me that cause I looked scummy I was less likely to get support. Also I learned shit in the shadow game #learn #smrt #townielyfe it also makes you look like you care.more about looking like town than finding scum
|
On February 05 2014 12:05 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:00 jaybrundage wrote:On February 05 2014 11:56 Oatsmaster wrote:
Oh man jay why are you so concerned on what people think about you? The first step to playing town is to show your innocence. If people think your innocent then your one less mislynch and people will be more likely to listen to you. Like in LOL PYP I thought supersoft was scum on like day 2. But I couldn't convince anyone to vote with me. After the game someone mentioned to me that cause I looked scummy I was less likely to get support. Also I learned shit in the shadow game #learn #smrt #townielyfe it also makes you look like you care.more about looking like town than finding scum
that's what i'm saying.
Oats, I dunno man. hopeless has 11 pages of filter in 10 days of that smb game.
|
On February 05 2014 11:59 JonnyLaw wrote:
Balla I came to the exact same conclusion. He's hard to read. This is interesting though.
So like why are you justifying not wanting to lynch him because of that "conclusion" though?
On February 05 2014 11:59 JonnyLaw wrote:Balla I came to the exact same conclusion. He's hard to read. This is interesting though. Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Isn't this a direct contradiction to what Oats thinks of Koshi?
No because he is answering my question that is assuming Koshi is town creating a "bait". He said this in response to suki's post here:
+ Show Spoiler +On February 05 2014 09:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:24 suki wrote:So right now Oats is super scummy to me. His "case" against Koshi is bad, and yet he continues to push it. He's also not consistent with his views: On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
suki nullish, dunno why she is attacking you though, bad reasons but not inherently scummy.
Cakeman also null. Same with johnny. i mean, nobody is really pushing shit and its hard to figure out if they are posting for the sake of it or posting to find scum. Literally throughout the whole 7-8 pages there is no concerted effort to push someone by anyone.
Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup. On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
This is almost a scum claim right here. Oats is doing the exact thing that he says scum would do, and yet he's calling other people out for it. Who is Oats willing to lynch today? This whole point makes no sense to me, I said thats what I thought koshi mightve done if he was town, at that time I thought he was scum so thats like a non-point.On February 05 2014 01:39 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis.
I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch.
(... On a side note, I don't approve of the personal attack calling Hopeless a 'useless piece of shit'.) Anyways. He suddenly thinks Hopeless is super scummy, without any reasoning. This is after LoneMeow has stated suspicions on Hopeless so it feels like a bandwagon. Hopeless was one of the people who didn't shit on Koshi's policy, and said that the policy makes him feel motivated. So this big scum tell that Oats has been pushing the entire game doesn't apply to his choice of lynches? He reads cake as null and yet it's cake and hopeless who he wants to discuss. Why not me, who you said was scummy for 'jumping on Koshi's policy' or those 'other dudes' that you so specifically called out? Why is LoneMeow town even though he was the most vocal about probably not meeting Koshi's 40 post policy? [green]Again, this presupposes I think Koshi is town. Regardless, hopeless was kidding and he can be useful as town but he hasnt done anything this game. I wanted to discuss people not being discussed. Hm. Also this exchange just leaves a bad taste in my mouth: On February 04 2014 12:10 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hi guys, [jay] probably town On February 04 2014 12:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:17 suki wrote:On February 04 2014 12:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:13 suki wrote:
And what reasons do you have for saying Jay is town? he's trying to advance the game to find scum duhhhh. Sorry I must be a bit slow. Can you provide a few examples where you feel that he is advancing the game to find scum? asking all those questions Also, why does Oats avoid Balla's question here? He's not being transparent, and if he thinks Balla is town then why throw the question back at him? I answered the question in the next post, I was making a joke.On February 05 2014 01:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 05 2014 01:53 Balla24 wrote:
Before I answer that can you answer me this:
Am I leaning town or scum? Same for LM. I thought you disapproved of the asking questions before giving your own answers? In summary, Oats is calling people scummy for something that he himself is actively doing. His reads on people seem random, rather than thought out. There's no logical progression on why he thinks Hopeless is super scummy and worth lynching (it feels like bandwagoning to try to push an easy lurker lynch). There's no explanation on why LoneMeow is town to him despite the dissonance with his 'Koshi policy' case. When asked to explain himself he's extremely reluctant. He tries to deflect attention from himself. This all reads as scum to me. So suki thinks that hopeless is town, interesting. Anyway this whole cases relies on the fact that I think Koshi's trap is good, which it isnt. So yeahhhhh not such a good case.##vote Oatsmaster
|
On February 05 2014 12:07 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:59 JonnyLaw wrote:
Balla I came to the exact same conclusion. He's hard to read. This is interesting though.
So like why are you justifying not wanting to lynch him because of that "conclusion" though? Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:59 JonnyLaw wrote:Balla I came to the exact same conclusion. He's hard to read. This is interesting though. On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Isn't this a direct contradiction to what Oats thinks of Koshi? No because he is answering my question that is assuming Koshi is town creating a "bait". He said this in response to suki's post here: + Show Spoiler +On February 05 2014 09:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:24 suki wrote:So right now Oats is super scummy to me. His "case" against Koshi is bad, and yet he continues to push it. He's also not consistent with his views: On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
suki nullish, dunno why she is attacking you though, bad reasons but not inherently scummy.
Cakeman also null. Same with johnny. i mean, nobody is really pushing shit and its hard to figure out if they are posting for the sake of it or posting to find scum. Literally throughout the whole 7-8 pages there is no concerted effort to push someone by anyone.
Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup. On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
This is almost a scum claim right here. Oats is doing the exact thing that he says scum would do, and yet he's calling other people out for it. Who is Oats willing to lynch today? This whole point makes no sense to me, I said thats what I thought koshi mightve done if he was town, at that time I thought he was scum so thats like a non-point.On February 05 2014 01:39 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis.
I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch.
(... On a side note, I don't approve of the personal attack calling Hopeless a 'useless piece of shit'.) Anyways. He suddenly thinks Hopeless is super scummy, without any reasoning. This is after LoneMeow has stated suspicions on Hopeless so it feels like a bandwagon. Hopeless was one of the people who didn't shit on Koshi's policy, and said that the policy makes him feel motivated. So this big scum tell that Oats has been pushing the entire game doesn't apply to his choice of lynches? He reads cake as null and yet it's cake and hopeless who he wants to discuss. Why not me, who you said was scummy for 'jumping on Koshi's policy' or those 'other dudes' that you so specifically called out? Why is LoneMeow town even though he was the most vocal about probably not meeting Koshi's 40 post policy? [green]Again, this presupposes I think Koshi is town. Regardless, hopeless was kidding and he can be useful as town but he hasnt done anything this game. I wanted to discuss people not being discussed. Hm. Also this exchange just leaves a bad taste in my mouth: On February 04 2014 12:10 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hi guys, [jay] probably town On February 04 2014 12:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:17 suki wrote:On February 04 2014 12:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:13 suki wrote:
And what reasons do you have for saying Jay is town? he's trying to advance the game to find scum duhhhh. Sorry I must be a bit slow. Can you provide a few examples where you feel that he is advancing the game to find scum? asking all those questions Also, why does Oats avoid Balla's question here? He's not being transparent, and if he thinks Balla is town then why throw the question back at him? I answered the question in the next post, I was making a joke.On February 05 2014 01:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 05 2014 01:53 Balla24 wrote:
Before I answer that can you answer me this:
Am I leaning town or scum? Same for LM. I thought you disapproved of the asking questions before giving your own answers? In summary, Oats is calling people scummy for something that he himself is actively doing. His reads on people seem random, rather than thought out. There's no logical progression on why he thinks Hopeless is super scummy and worth lynching (it feels like bandwagoning to try to push an easy lurker lynch). There's no explanation on why LoneMeow is town to him despite the dissonance with his 'Koshi policy' case. When asked to explain himself he's extremely reluctant. He tries to deflect attention from himself. This all reads as scum to me. So suki thinks that hopeless is town, interesting. Anyway this whole cases relies on the fact that I think Koshi's trap is good, which it isnt. So yeahhhhh not such a good case.##vote Oatsmaster
No, that conclusion is the only reason I'd lynch him. Generally this game I've agreed with Oats though. I think there are better d1 candidates.
|
On February 05 2014 12:05 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:00 jaybrundage wrote:On February 05 2014 11:56 Oatsmaster wrote:
Oh man jay why are you so concerned on what people think about you? The first step to playing town is to show your innocence. If people think your innocent then your one less mislynch and people will be more likely to listen to you. Like in LOL PYP I thought supersoft was scum on like day 2. But I couldn't convince anyone to vote with me. After the game someone mentioned to me that cause I looked scummy I was less likely to get support. Also I learned shit in the shadow game #learn #smrt #townielyfe it also makes you look like you care.more about looking like town than finding scum
Why can't I do both? Did you not read my case on Lonemeow
|
On February 05 2014 12:08 JonnyLaw wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:07 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 11:59 JonnyLaw wrote:
Balla I came to the exact same conclusion. He's hard to read. This is interesting though.
So like why are you justifying not wanting to lynch him because of that "conclusion" though? On February 05 2014 11:59 JonnyLaw wrote:Balla I came to the exact same conclusion. He's hard to read. This is interesting though. On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Isn't this a direct contradiction to what Oats thinks of Koshi? No because he is answering my question that is assuming Koshi is town creating a "bait". He said this in response to suki's post here: + Show Spoiler +On February 05 2014 09:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 02:24 suki wrote:So right now Oats is super scummy to me. His "case" against Koshi is bad, and yet he continues to push it. He's also not consistent with his views: On February 04 2014 15:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
suki nullish, dunno why she is attacking you though, bad reasons but not inherently scummy.
Cakeman also null. Same with johnny. i mean, nobody is really pushing shit and its hard to figure out if they are posting for the sake of it or posting to find scum. Literally throughout the whole 7-8 pages there is no concerted effort to push someone by anyone.
Koshi scum for suggesting a really bad policy about post counts and nothing else. It feels like bait for scum to jump on but there is no followup. On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
1. Scum will go and shit on Koshi for it because its bad and scummy.
2. yeah suki and some other dudes.
3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy.
mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
This is almost a scum claim right here. Oats is doing the exact thing that he says scum would do, and yet he's calling other people out for it. Who is Oats willing to lynch today? This whole point makes no sense to me, I said thats what I thought koshi mightve done if he was town, at that time I thought he was scum so thats like a non-point.On February 05 2014 01:39 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis.
I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch.
(... On a side note, I don't approve of the personal attack calling Hopeless a 'useless piece of shit'.) Anyways. He suddenly thinks Hopeless is super scummy, without any reasoning. This is after LoneMeow has stated suspicions on Hopeless so it feels like a bandwagon. Hopeless was one of the people who didn't shit on Koshi's policy, and said that the policy makes him feel motivated. So this big scum tell that Oats has been pushing the entire game doesn't apply to his choice of lynches? He reads cake as null and yet it's cake and hopeless who he wants to discuss. Why not me, who you said was scummy for 'jumping on Koshi's policy' or those 'other dudes' that you so specifically called out? Why is LoneMeow town even though he was the most vocal about probably not meeting Koshi's 40 post policy? [green]Again, this presupposes I think Koshi is town. Regardless, hopeless was kidding and he can be useful as town but he hasnt done anything this game. I wanted to discuss people not being discussed. Hm. Also this exchange just leaves a bad taste in my mouth: On February 04 2014 12:10 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hi guys, [jay] probably town On February 04 2014 12:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:17 suki wrote:On February 04 2014 12:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 04 2014 12:13 suki wrote:
And what reasons do you have for saying Jay is town? he's trying to advance the game to find scum duhhhh. Sorry I must be a bit slow. Can you provide a few examples where you feel that he is advancing the game to find scum? asking all those questions Also, why does Oats avoid Balla's question here? He's not being transparent, and if he thinks Balla is town then why throw the question back at him? I answered the question in the next post, I was making a joke.On February 05 2014 01:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 05 2014 01:53 Balla24 wrote:
Before I answer that can you answer me this:
Am I leaning town or scum? Same for LM. I thought you disapproved of the asking questions before giving your own answers? In summary, Oats is calling people scummy for something that he himself is actively doing. His reads on people seem random, rather than thought out. There's no logical progression on why he thinks Hopeless is super scummy and worth lynching (it feels like bandwagoning to try to push an easy lurker lynch). There's no explanation on why LoneMeow is town to him despite the dissonance with his 'Koshi policy' case. When asked to explain himself he's extremely reluctant. He tries to deflect attention from himself. This all reads as scum to me. So suki thinks that hopeless is town, interesting. Anyway this whole cases relies on the fact that I think Koshi's trap is good, which it isnt. So yeahhhhh not such a good case.##vote Oatsmaster No, that conclusion is the only reason I'd lynch him. Generally this game I've agreed with Oats though. I think there are better d1 candidates.
I must be misreading or something? You said the exact opposite here:
On February 05 2014 11:46 JonnyLaw wrote:
I won't lynch Oats today. I read two of his town games and played scum with him in lolpyp. He seems interested enough in this game and it's not different than his normal town play. He could be scum but don't think he's the best d1 lynch.
|
Exactly what I said. I don't want to lynch him today.
That post I quoted is the only reason I'd want to lynch him in general at this point. Never said today. It's there for future reference and conversation.
|
On February 05 2014 12:03 JonnyLaw wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:49 jaybrundage wrote:On February 05 2014 11:23 JonnyLaw wrote:On February 05 2014 11:17 jaybrundage wrote:On February 05 2014 11:10 JonnyLaw wrote:On February 05 2014 11:05 Balla24 wrote:
I'd lynch LoneMeow. That's fine. I want to talk about Jay. He's actually here. Both times I question him about something he comes in with a town-like response to the questions. Jay refuses to do that until there's pressure on him though. How is this town behavior? I find this funny. Should I come up with a scum like response? Also you do realize that I was making that case before you posted your "pressure" on me. I'm trying to talk to you Jay. You called Suki scum twice then change your mind once she posts a case on Oats. What do you think about Oats? You claim to like the case but don't say anything else. I want to know why. You've played with Oats before this game. We can chat about Lonemeow after this if you'd like. For now, I'm curious about some of your opinions. Yes I thought suki was scummy before. Her thing about not calling Jonny scum but interesting or what ever word she used did bother me. She just seemed to have no point to your posts. However with her case on Oats it showed that she wasn't just trying to appear to be posting. She actually was analyzing the game and looking for scum. So my read turned on her. Is it possible she's scum that noticed she was getting heat and decided to post a case? Sure possible. But I think the most likely possibility at this point is town. I don't remember Oats too well in my previous games. He was never someone I really suspected. He can be hard to draw a bead on sometimes. Not a huge poster mostly short clip comments. I even had to go back and look briefly at the LoL PYP game. I think the case made good points I hadn't noticed before. Oats was not on my lynch list before Suki posted her case. And she made a good enough case for me to consider lynching him. Also I felt the reason to make my own case because I want to contribute to the town. I didn't plan to just sheep Suki's read and just say yea I like all this Ill join. Because I wanted to post my own analysis I got's me an ego you know. Also by posting other scummy people we can choose as a town who we want to go for based on the information we have. You don't need to sheep Suki. Post your opinion. "I like this part and I don't like this part." You're trying to tell people how to play and what to look for and then you have that post. You flip on Suki and at the same time aren't trying to convince people how to play the game anymore. ##vote Jaybrundage
I have no need to defend oats. Oats can do that himself. I liked the case in general. Why should I nitpick when I have no need too. Can I not agree with a case? I liked the case. Its that simple. I agree with the case. I dont see how you don't get it. Yes I changed my read on suki. I'm trying to figure out the game. She made a good case so more likely to be town.
|
On February 05 2014 12:12 JonnyLaw wrote:
Exactly what I said. I don't want to lynch him today.
That post I quoted is the only reason I'd want to lynch him in general at this point. Never said today. It's there for future reference and conversation.
So you don't agree with my conclusion and his defense vs suki that I posted that is relevant to that quote? Why?
|
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters.
|
On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters.
So you completely disagree with his LoneMeow case then?
|
On February 05 2014 12:23 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters. So you completely disagree with his LoneMeow case then?
Of course not. I think he makes a lot of reasonable points. I can filter anyone and find reasonable points.
I think Jay's scummier than LM or Oats.
|
On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters.
Ok lemme get this straight. You think im scum. But you don't disagree about my case on lonemeow. So what am I doing that is so scummy. If you say acting townie or some stupid shit like that. I won't be happy.
On February 05 2014 12:25 JonnyLaw wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:23 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters. So you completely disagree with his LoneMeow case then? Of course not. I think he makes a lot of reasonable points. I can filter anyone and find reasonable points. I think Jay's scummier than LM or Oats.
|
Nah LM case is bad mainly because you are miffed that he is just asking questions. Also too many assumptions drawn about LM
|
On February 05 2014 12:33 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters. Ok lemme get this straight. You think im scum. But you don't disagree about my case on lonemeow. So what am I doing that is so scummy. If you say acting townie or some stupid shit like that. I won't be happy. Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:25 JonnyLaw wrote:On February 05 2014 12:23 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters. So you completely disagree with his LoneMeow case then? Of course not. I think he makes a lot of reasonable points. I can filter anyone and find reasonable points. I think Jay's scummier than LM or Oats.
Scum can make a decent case too.
I've said why I think you're scummy. You tell other players what to do and don't do it yourself unless questioned. Until your post on LM you said nothing all game. I really, really hate your post about suki. It's not about "oats defending himself." It's what do you think about it. It made suki town in your eyes. I get it. What do you think about the case and Oats? I don't care if you think Suki's town suddenly because of one post.
|
On February 05 2014 12:37 JonnyLaw wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 12:33 jaybrundage wrote:On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters. Ok lemme get this straight. You think im scum. But you don't disagree about my case on lonemeow. So what am I doing that is so scummy. If you say acting townie or some stupid shit like that. I won't be happy. On February 05 2014 12:25 JonnyLaw wrote:On February 05 2014 12:23 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 12:22 JonnyLaw wrote:
The rest of it seems like normal Oats posts.
Oats is doing whatever he wants. Oats seems more comfortable. Jay feels like he's buying town cred. Jay's leading the town over a cliff.
I'm gonna go reread some filters. So you completely disagree with his LoneMeow case then? Of course not. I think he makes a lot of reasonable points. I can filter anyone and find reasonable points. I think Jay's scummier than LM or Oats. Scum can make a decent case too.I've said why I think you're scummy. You tell other players what to do and don't do it yourself unless questioned. Until your post on LM you said nothing all game. I really, really hate your post about suki. It's not about "oats defending himself." It's what do you think about it. It made suki town in your eyes. I get it. What do you think about the case and Oats? I don't care if you think Suki's town suddenly because of one post.
You seem to be focusing to much on one post I made that you don't like instead of looking at my game play as a whole.
On Oats I looked over his responses and saw that Balla thought they were good. When looking then over tho. I still don't find them to be great.
|
@Jonny Also I posted the lonemeow case before I saw your post. I was finished with my case and I read up on the thread to see if anything happened when I was gone. Saw your post so i posted a funny ok ill start playing the game. And posted my case. Your assertion that I just started hunting scum cause you made a post on me is wrong.
|
On February 05 2014 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 11:58 Balla24 wrote:On February 05 2014 11:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
Suki's case was bad though, it all hinged on the point that I thought objecting to koshi's policy was scummy. Which I never said. All I said was that it was what I thought koshi was doing if he was town.
Hopeless, why are you playing scummily different from the past 2-3 games? Can you please post what you are referring to. Quote some stuff from his entrances in this game and the other games. Compare and contrast for us please. It's annoying that you think we will go find it (not saying I won't but I can't say the same for everybody else). I already asked you to do it. If it's good information then bring it forward, or are you just BSing? Im on my phone. What annoys me is that you apparently dont care about hopeless's alignment. You could check on hopeless' games and then make a decision and see what I say. But no, you want to be spoonfed anything. Do you think hopeless is particularly town? If not, why are you indirectly defending him?
Even if you're on your phone you can post what you see without posting quotes.
I want to see what you see dude, what's so hard to understand about that? I don't want to have to guess what you see. If you say something is scummy then you must provide what you think is scummy instead of forcing us to guess.
What's the point of hiding it?
Is it straight up the fact that he is lurking as an entry in comparison to high volume post entry? Is it the fact that he actually posts some substance in the others (reads in SMB, mayor candidacy in LXIV.1)? Is it the fact that he is more trolly? What is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
