|
On February 04 2014 12:41 cakemanofdoom wrote:
Eh jay you don't like my choice of topics? suki's first post talked about gender, niceness, and her feeling on policy lynches in general. But no detail on what she thought of Koshi's particular policy, which imo is the most important thing she could have talked about. Feels like she was trying to seem helpful while avoiding anything that mattered.
Plus I liked the way discussion was going for the other things.
I don't think Koshi's policy specifically was that important. We aren't going to arbitrary lynch someone who has under 40 posts. She gave her opinion on policy lynches. I felt like it was focusing on a detail that wasn't very important. There were quite a few other things in the thread that i thought were more noticeable or important.
|
On February 04 2014 12:45 suki wrote:
@cakeman, you said you thought jay's post was okay. Is your impression of jay at this point more townie or scummy?
Suki I want to see more of your thinking on me. What do you think of the post I copy pasted over from my Spreadsheet. I talked a bit about you in it. What do you think about it.
I want to know what YOU think? Talk about me please :D Or anyone at all but i want to hear your opinion. I gave you my opinion on everyone in the game.
|
On February 04 2014 12:57 suki wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 12:49 jaybrundage wrote:On February 04 2014 12:45 suki wrote:
@cakeman, you said you thought jay's post was okay. Is your impression of jay at this point more townie or scummy? Suki I want to see more of your thinking on me. What do you think of the post I copy pasted over from my Spreadsheet. I talked a bit about you in it. What do you think about it. I want to know what YOU think? Talk about me please :D Or anyone at all but i want to hear your opinion. I gave you my opinion on everyone in the game. I like your post and your line of thinking thus far. The fact that you've put a lot of thought into sidesprang's meta is a point in your favour as it's less likely scum would do that. Your read on me is whatever. I'm pressuring you the most so the fact that you think I'm scummy is understandable I guess. Anyways you're coming off to me as town for now. I don't have any solid reads on scum at the moment so I am just throwing out my line and seeing what I can reel back in.
The spread sheet was made before you started pressuring. Don't confuse my suspicion with an OMGUS. My thinking of why you were scummy when i wrote it was because of your waffleing with your poke at jonny. You made a poke at him. Asking him of his two "different" opinions. Then you said he didn't change his mind when it seemed obvious he did. And when balla poked at your post you said you never suspected jonny as scum. Which just seems way overly defensive. Why wouldn't you suspect everyone at this point until they prove them self as town. I don't see intention behind your posts besides to post for the sake of it.
|
On February 04 2014 13:10 WaveofShadow wrote:
THIS GUY EDITED I FOUND THE SCUM
|
On February 04 2014 10:54 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 07:23 Koshi wrote:
Oats and Alakaslam will easily make it. jay can make it, we will be buds after LoL
LoL Pick your power league I was never close to being lynched. Scum tried though. And they died. Painfully. Due to my inventions. Glorious. YOU BET AON I CANT GUARANTEE QUALITEE BUT I CANNAE AVOID TEH SPAM WITHOUT ÜUBERLURK
ALakaslam you were reading up on the game. But never posted anything with content after. Whats up?
|
On February 04 2014 14:58 Alakaslam wrote:Because she calls it fluff and that's true so she is right Are you telling me you learned anything from Nashville? No that spiel, talk text
So to get it straight you think what i posted had no purpose?
|
On February 04 2014 15:10 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 15:02 jaybrundage wrote:On February 04 2014 14:58 Alakaslam wrote:On February 04 2014 14:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
why? Because she calls it fluff and that's true so she is right Are you telling me you learned anything from Nashville? No that spiel, talk text So to get it straight you think what i posted had no purpose? It did have purpose. Not a pro town purpose. If you are town you need to cut out anything that isn't patently obvious, that post it would've been a lot better if it only included those questions.
Ok first off its hard to understand your meaning when your phone keeps putting random words and auto correct or what not. In a game of words please make sure yours are legible.
Second you won't be able to follow the game if you can't see usernames. You say your self that you can't see usernames till you quote. Therefore you can't follow the flow of the game who's asking what so on and so forth. I could go on but I wouldn't wanna post to much "fluff." So given that you don't even know who's saying what. How do you even think you can judge the game correctly?
I will type as much as i want for one big reason. Transparency I rather type more so people understand my meaning then type less and have my meaning or intent get skewed. I also tend to type less in my usually meta and make quick one liners. So to change that this game. I am trying to put more content in my post and always make sure I have a message.
|
On February 04 2014 15:08 Alakaslam wrote:
Dude I just read that list post, you how your scum team? That's freaking hilarious everyone scum that could possibly be town four numbers and everyone and it could possibly be scum for number is town
Like this gum team is five times the size of town not vice versa
Are people even reading this stuff really
This is unreadable
|
On February 04 2014 15:08 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 15:06 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 14:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
Suki was pushing jay.
Its a read that could be discuss. Why do you disagree? It's not about the read... maybe I agree with it maybe I don't. The whole point is a read is useless without elaboration and reasoning. Also, posting a town read at that point makes no sense. You basically defended jaybrundage for no reason. On February 04 2014 14:57 Alakaslam wrote:On February 04 2014 12:01 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 11:54 suki wrote:
cake we can discuss jay's big post and what you think of it.
My thought is he uses a lot of words to essentially say nothing. Some people post more fluff than others. What are you trying to say? You're generically saying it's bad but not saying why. You really think he's not accomplishing anything with that? Of course my phone is glitch ing so I have to try and type this out-_- No actually he didn't I learned nothing from it You learning nothing does not mean he didn't accomplish anything. Are you saying you learned nothing from the response to it too? Cause that's straight BS. I hard defended jay so we didnt have to waste time being all wishy washy about him. Balla, who is scum?
Do you have anything to commentate on that happened during this day so far? What do you think of cakeman, Suki, and jonny
|
On February 04 2014 15:20 Alakaslam wrote:
Last post by Jay Brundage makes sense I'm done fighting this thing, i'll be back when I can charge it or have a PC
Please don't post on your phone again if its gonna be this nonsensical. Take the time to correct it on your phone and reread what your typing or just go to a computer
|
Oats im going to bed its your shift to keep the conversation flowing. 
MAKE ME PROUD!
|
Koshi your first post was made to generate discussion. Its a null tell for me. However now that there was alot of discussion in the thread all i see you doing now is defending your self. Alot more happened then people just responding to your post. I want to see your thoughts on things like that. The back and forth that occurred and the conversation. I don't feel it should be necessary to have to supply you with questions to get your thoughts on things. You have quite a few games under your belt. Lets see some thought processes.
Lonemeow Your early posting is to be straight forward calling for a policy lynch. You state that a lurker lynch should be based on amount of content. Your content is lacking. You don't seem to have the initiative to put your own thoughts out there and make a real effort to find scum. Again this is about have a conversing with the thread. Your not doing it. There is no comment on any of the other things that happened. Besides some stuff about balla who voted ON YOU to pressure you to post more. And a speck of speculation on Koshi. Bare bones stuff not even.
On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote:
Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts.
I have no foundation to create a town read on you this game. So your not playing the game with the intent of showing that your town and are making the game harder for all the other players involved. So based on the assumption that you don't want to get lurker lynched I propose the same thing I said to sidesprang. I would like you to create an arbitrary about of posts that you set for your self a little higher then your would normally go for, but something that is reasonable to obtain. To keep it clear I don't want you to spam. I want you to have have a clear intention with your post. I'll repeat that CLEAR INTENTIONS WHEN YOU POST!!!
I realize I am repeating my self with my post to sidesprang and some might consider this fluff with no purpose. However if I feel its necessary to produce content and get the lurkers in here to post I'll do it till i get me some alignment reads on them.
These are people we need more content from
I would also like alakaslam to come and post some your posting last night was unreadable and made no sense. Get a computer and start reading up and posting.
Hopeless1der you had two posts about nothing yesterday time to step it up.
Sidesprang you never responded to my post about setting up a minimum post limit for your self. What say you?
|
On February 05 2014 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +Why did he single out me as someone who has not posted much and claim I'm scummy based on that, given that at the time there were many others who would fit the criteria aswell? Yeah I saw this too and thought it was weird. Jay, stop giving advice to all the scummy people and attack someone. Balla, I want to see stuff that is not influenced by my conclusions. What do you think about Cake and hopeless?
It's day one this is the time to give advice. I want to give people the chance to produce content before they are threatened with a lynch cause they are unreadable and a liability to town.
It feels early in the day to start a lynch wagon on someone. I rather keep feeling people out before going gungho on my suspected scum.
|
On February 05 2014 01:25 Koshi wrote:
Oats is still hilarious.
Dude this isn't the post I wanted to see from you. You have no content. Talk about something that happened this past day.
|
On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote:
Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said.
+1
|
On February 05 2014 01:46 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote:
Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said. Or we came to the same conclusion independantly which says something about LM's alignment. HAH. Do you think Im scum?
What you asked questions about Cake and Hopeless then you said the exact same thing balla said. Like you even called him hopeless shit when balla had refereed as to him doing jack shit.
Where did LM come into this. What do you think about LM.
|
On February 05 2014 02:10 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 15:28 jaybrundage wrote:On February 04 2014 15:20 Alakaslam wrote:
Last post by Jay Brundage makes sense I'm done fighting this thing, i'll be back when I can charge it or have a PC Please don't post on your phone again if its gonna be this nonsensical. Take the time to correct it on your phone and reread what your typing or just go to a computer I understand this sentiment but I think you actually did understand my posts in a sense. I was UNABLE to edit them. That is what was so bad, I could barely get it to register a tap in the words and had to use talk text. That is why I stopped. Anything that didn't make sense I will try to clarify after I catch up and probably after work. it is still morning. jaybrundage you are rapidly convincing me you are scum.
I understood them in the sense that you think im scummy and don't like some of my posts. However why you thought they were scummy is a mystery to me. I would love to hear your thinking.
I still adhere to the fact that if you can't see someone's username and see who is posting what. That your reads are going to be terrible. I hope you can read the game knowing who is posting what.
|
On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote:
Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said.
On February 05 2014 01:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
Or we came to the same conclusion independantly which says something about LM's alignment.
HAH.
Do you think Im scum?
Oatsmaster this quote coming from what Balla said makes no sense to me. Do you realize that the bolded part was him talking to you?
He never said anything about LM in that post.
|
SUKI GONNA RUSTLE SOME JIMMIES
I like your case seems well thought out and pretty straight forward logic. The first big case of the thread :D
|
On February 05 2014 02:38 Alakaslam wrote:
pffft.
you all crappin on my styles
##unvote
##Vote: Oatsmaster
His flip may provide sufficient information in and of itself. If he is town, we take his posting to this point more seriously. Otherwise, oh happy day!
He is not particularly townie so there should be no problem with this.
So looking at my posting the thing that you might perceive as "scummy" Is that I am not posting my own opinion as much as prodding other's for information. And that is intentional I want to see more posting from lurkers that is my number 1 concern at the moment. I want to be able to separate the town lurkers to the scum lurkers.
My other question is why did you vote Lonemeow but then vote Oatsmaster when suki and Balla made cases and votes against him. What was your initial intention to vote lone meow in the first place?
Why switch over to Oats just cause thread sentiment is going in that direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
