EPTGSL Open Mini Mafia IV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
| ||
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
On February 04 2014 09:21 Blazinghand wrote: signups are full! role pms will go out in about 3 hours. WELP glhf | ||
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
Hi everybody. Just got into work and see this has started. My body is ready. NaDa thing can go wrong. On February 13 2014 04:07 Mattchew wrote: QuantumPope, are you a man? You question my manhood? | ||
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
On February 13 2014 04:13 Mattchew wrote: yes, so answer the question. Are you a man? What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets. But enough talk… Have at you! ##Vote Mattchew | ||
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:18 roundabound wrote: Okay so IAmRobik given you were so hard on going after lurkers early on in the game how come you don't question Mattchew & QuantumPope now? One of them has unanswered questions and instead of answering them he jsut posted some crap and QP made a shitty couple of posts (yes, i totally disagree with them being "townie because no fucks given") and peaced out. There is also Grackaroni who hasn't said much anything of value. Why single out thrawn of those people and now that your (apparently?) pressure on him has been answered satisfactory why are you not following with your eagerness to read people and your own scumhunting methods you started the game with? Like you called out people lurking or scared to post 1h into the game, what about those people now? ~rayn I dislike the use of calling my posts shitty. I merely reacted when I was pinged. I am not defending Robik here in the slightest though and found it suspicious of how someone found me town based on my posts as they were pretty unsubstantial. If there are two people who I trust to read me correctly in this thread it's Mattchew and IAmRobik as they have had the most interaction with me outside of this forum but being able to read correctly can also lean mafia. I have null reads on both of them at the moment. As for scum we really have not found a bunch of information in my opinion as it's early on. | ||
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:44 roundabound wrote: See here is why these posts are shitty. You could just say "i agree with you", but instead you write ~100 words... ~rayn Less words = more scummy k | ||
|
QuantumPope
Canada76 Posts
On February 13 2014 23:23 IAmRobik wrote: I think I've played less than a handful of games with QP. Only one memorable games where he mislynched me at f3 when both of us were town. I don't remember any other games that we've played. I wouldn't say that I'm able to read him well. In fact, if not for some stuff I picked up from his first post, I would not be clearing him and would say he's about as null a read as any others in here that I've never played with. I just got to work (in 8 inches of snow). No one is here, so I'm gonna take the opportunity to reread d1 so far. Ugh never forget lol. On February 13 2014 11:57 roundabound wrote: @QP There is a knowledge triangle between yourself, Mattchew and IAR. Substantiated by: Note their opinions of you: Did you expect both of these players to "town read" you with so little analysis? Further, Mattchew is my achilles heel. What is the secret to reading him? ~moc I could see that little banter I had with Mattchew is something we both like doing. It could be looked at as town but strange to me that he would trust me so willingly after a few posts. As for IAmRobik I feel that he is able to read me pretty well. I've been pretty lackluster in this thread but it's better to have an early read on me than no read at all. Now to our thrilling conclusion. On February 14 2014 01:32 Mattchew wrote: rayn, my town read on QP was hastey and unwarrented. I do not have a read on him currently Almost as hasty and unwarranted as this post. I find it strange that both of them early on give "town reads" on me and then suddenly retract when absolutely no information was added other than my silence. Really strange reactions from both of them. | ||
| ||
