EPTNormal Mini Mafia: Episode I - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 01:47 bumatlarge wrote: You'd think I'd vote for him, BUT THERE IS ACTUALLY SOMEONE EVEN WORSE. VisceraEyes ladies and gentlemen! Rayn's inane posting visibly having its effect on people. I'm allowed to be somewhat reserved in the first hour I enter the threa suki. And even then, if you read my posts, I am clearly not on the fence. The only thing holing me back from lynching VE is that I know he can be silly sometimes, but even afterwards, it perpetuates in all his posts even after the fact. I'm assuming this is referencing rayn's post. I have to restrain myself from calling this the worst post, because I've witnessed townies doing this. Rayn makes a post about me. All of it is wrong. VE in the most generic and assuming way possible, agrees with it. Again, I've seen a townie do this, and I want to be sure about this. I mean, VE might have just skimmed it an be reconsidering agreeing- Alright, I can't ignore this blatant display of anti-town. 1. Blinly agrees with bad analysis. Maybe that's subjective, and I'm biased because it is against me. I'd make this point null. 2. Fails to support his own view, AND PROCEEDS TO ASK SOMEONE ELSES OPINION ON THAT. Looks like he wants to talk about it, but has no interest in actually doing that. Why not ask someone else to do it for you while doing nothing yourself? I don't even think VE planned it out that way, it was just instinct. 3. This asinine persistence to post about VT claims that have nothing to do with day 1. WHO CARES WHOS CLAIMING IT. It one of the most dead-end conversations I have ever seen. And it's WIFOM. Anyone can say it with 0 detriment, and I would have no opinion on it as of right now. PSA: BUM IS A CLAIMED VT. THAT IS ALL, CONTINUE SKIMMING THIS BECAUSE I KNOW YOU AREN'T ACTUALLY READING THIS POST. YOU DUMB BASTARDS ##Vote VisceraEyes Where are the things that make VE mafia? Those green things are the things that say VE could do that as town. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:25 suki wrote: Because Rayn is tunneling him and twisting his words and I think it's unproductive. Actually show me where i am twisting his words. A couple of posts before this you agree with what i was saying about him. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:18 suki wrote: @Rayn I agree that he's not making strong statements and that he seems to be overthinking the 'what if I'm wrong' part of his argument. However, I had a peek at bum's previous games and he plays the same sort of non-commital game as townie. I think his case makes sense minus the wishy-washiness, and I agree with him that VE has been playing scummy (kush being second on my list). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:31 bumatlarge wrote: Do you have more on Kush rayn? If you have something more, I'd like to hear it. I find him difficult to read. And I believe Barristan is the last person that needs to post. I'd suggest people start to vote now so we can see where we are at. I think there is enough content that people should be able to make some reasonable reads. What i have on kush is what i have said. He has a townread on half of the people in the game and refuses to explain why. If he is town he has reasons for his reads. If he is scum he has not. Seems like he has not. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:32 suki wrote: - - - Perhaps it's just a difference in interpretation, but you start grilling bumatlarge for being 'inconsistent' when I don't see one. What, you even agreed with me in saying the case is wishy-washy. How can you call me out for "twisting his words" when you agree with me, because that was what i was saying before he clarified his case? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:41 suki wrote: I agreed that it was wishy-washy, but I disagree with your statement that his reads were inconsistent. I think his 1., 2., 3. points were clearly points towards a VE scum theory, wishy-washyness aside. You were making it sound like he was going back and forth without a clear reason and then just randomly voted against VE without providing evidence. It's because he didn't provide clear evidence. You even agreed with me on that. Like he literally said "he could do this as mafia or he could do this as town". How am i twisting his words if i say he is saying "he could do this as mafia or he could do this as town"? I even pointed out where he did so - if you can't prove me wrong you can't say i am twisting his words. That's what i read from his post, what he meant was irrelevant because he later on explained it - it was that time, but i sure as hell was not twisting his words in any direction and i want you to explain why you are trying to say i did something i clearly did not do? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
If someone makes a case that says "i think this guy is mafia but they could also be town" and votes for them my first impression is always "this case is bullshit because they don't even really think the other dude is scum". Why am i supposed to not question a case that does not even imply the guy thinks the person they are accusing is mafia? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:49 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Other than my last post I haven't trolled at all this game though. There was intention behind my posts. Apparently you're also not interested in finding out my alignment or trying to start conversation with me so I guess I'll just make my intention clear. ##vote Raynpelikoneet So you are calling me scum because i didn't counter-claim your mafia claim. Fucking terrible. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:55 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'm calling you scum because you're not engaging me in conversation when you have had a myriad of possibilities to do so which I can explain only from a scum point of view. You don't want me to get a correct read on you. I will engage you in conversation when you say something useful. Everything you have said is useless so far. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43188 Posts
On January 21 2014 03:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote: So why don't you ask any questions to me? You seem completely uninterested in my alignment and are throwing down arbitrary barriers just to prevent a conversation from taking place, which points to you being scum. Why are you stupid? Is this another "i wanna lynch rayn reardless of his alignment" bullshit type of thing? Here, let me anwer your posts (which i could have easily done): On January 20 2014 09:01 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Hey guys. I'm Mafia. What roles did you guys get? I don't have time for your stupid games. Go do something that finds us mafia. On January 20 2014 09:22 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I was expecting a counterclaim. I'm very disappointed  I don't have time for your stupid games. Go do something that finds us mafia. On January 21 2014 02:33 Artanis[Xp] wrote: What is different in these two scenarios? I don't have time for your stupid games. Go do something that finds us mafia. On January 21 2014 02:54 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I don't understand why no one addressed my atrocious return into the thread. I don't have time for your stupid games. Go do something that finds us mafia. There, happy? Now, instead of making bullshit arguments go do something that finds us mafia. | ||
| ||
