EPTWhat.
TL Mafia LXIV: The Restart
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
What. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
In unrelated news, is there a way I can change my name on this site? This name is completely retarded and it sounds like something a downs kid came up with whilst high as fuck. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
I don't understand his name either and that makes me confused and angry and hungry for quantum blood. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
But, ohwait, why did you make that lovely campaign post but then not vote for yourself? Why would you do that to me BC Why | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
If you want yourself to be mayor you should vote yourself in, plain and simple. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 03:34 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Oats/Kush/Skans can you guys form a Triumvirate and one of you run for mayor? Or just vote me mayor? I'd vote kush if he ran for mayor. It me or Oats runs I doubt we'd get any votes. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
*cackles manically* | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
It's something scum COULD do, but town could do it just the same, and with many different motives. It's not very indicative in my opinion. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 06:39 Skanjab1s wrote: Town has many reasons to bluehunt, though, but I agree that non-conf should be. EBWOP: Non-conf town shouldn't* I don't know why i said should be. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 15:48 Oatsmaster wrote: hey twe3k you fuck, how come im not in the OMGUS alliance shit. Ahaha, because you come from TL, silly. I can't just be letting everybody into our secret club, it's exclusive, y'know. If you want to join us you're going to have to do something to prove your worth, baby. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
You broke my heart, dbz, you broke my heart. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 15:56 Mocsta wrote: ims till waiting for an answer to these untrustworthy ppl I meant to say "untrusting", I wasn't calling anyone untrustworthy, I just used the wrong word. On January 27 2014 15:57 VisceraEyes wrote: You're all flunkies from another website. Our love for the game is what brings us together. THE GAME. Are you just trying to hurt me, is that what this is | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 16:01 VisceraEyes wrote: Even if you ARE forest scum and WILL perish by my hand eventually. Oh please, we of the forest are borne of an ever-replenishable resource. We can never be defeated. Have you forgotten the result of our last battle? On January 27 2014 16:01 Mocsta wrote: Skanjab1s Is there someone you clearly want lynched this DAy 1? You're probably the person I'd be happiest to lynch today, Mocsta. But other than that, no, there isn't. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 16:09 Mocsta wrote: You're probably the person I'd be happiest to lynch today, Mocsta. But other than that, no, there isn't. Do you have a reason?[/QUOTE] Yes, your questions are distracting me from my ulterior motives. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Shush honey, so does literally everyone in the alliance. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 27 2014 16:55 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm not out for anyone's throat. BH has played a pretty obviously scummy game to me, unless I'm missing something in PM land. But my experience with him in PM land has left me relatively certain that BH is scum. Could you share the PM's please, if they're that incriminating? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 28 2014 03:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: Who are the current mayor candidates? Hey rayn, me and Wile were super best friends in PM land. We made an unbreakable vow and virtually picked daisies it was so romantic and friendship and magically. So now you have replaced him and as such you are required to fill the role of my new best friend. Congratulations. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 28 2014 04:37 VisceraEyes wrote: Maybe explain this in a little detail? BC has shown himself to be way townier than rayn, and imo, townBC has a better chance of lynching scum D1 than a townrayn does | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 28 2014 05:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: Explain both of your statements here. Well, I think BC is town and I'm null on you at the moment. But just judging from the last game we played together, your early game reads tend to not be very good, or you tend to get sidetracked by wanting to lynch people who are trolling or are playing anti-town, instead of actually lynching scum. Your late game reads tend to be a lot better, though. Added to this, I disagree with your thoughts that QP is scum, and I don't want him to be lynched today. Also, I missed this question before: On January 28 2014 04:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: Skanjab1s why did you decide to PM Wile in the first place instead of other people you know better? Or do you know him? What's your read on Wile before he replaced? I decided to PM because he apparently hadn't received any PMs and seemed to be having trouble participating in the game, so I was going to like, summarize thread happenings and talk with him about them. It would've helped both of us keep interest in the game, I thought. But sadly, he left without saying much of anything, other than he accepted my unbreakable vow of friendship and daisy-picking, so I have no read on him at all. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
And BC has done enough in the thread for me to be happy with him being mayor | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
If I was around I'd have switched to rayn, but alas, it was not to be. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
I have engaged in pm's with other people, though, Wile.E hasn't been the only person I've spoken to. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Yes, I'm not only bound to those fledglings. I haven't really been having many pm conversations, though. I'm not like, super active in private or anything. Speaking of omgus people, we should probably kill coag soon, I'm about 97% sure he's scum, but I can't say why. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Who is this mystery man? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
I have yet to filter people though, so this might change when I get around to that. Who're your top3 candidates? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:16 kushm4sta wrote: the case against coag has no reasoning behind it. There's plenty reasoning behind it, actually. Why are you defending him so hard when all I did was mention him? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 02:19 kushm4sta wrote: @coag if you are town please post your town badge. OHFUUUUUUUCK SHIT JUST GOT SERIOUS. kushmasta droppin' bombs out here yo, fo realz | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 06:30 QuantumPope wrote: You clearly pointed out my writing in your attack on me and did not mention anyone else's reads, though that can be assumed. Now you seem to have no problem with my writing? What? No I didn't, what are you talking about? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Oh, I thought you were talking about the length of the posts, my bad. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 06:56 Blazinghand wrote: boy quicktopic sure picked a good time to be down Can't you send in your nightkills? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Because he is scum for reasons and such, etc. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 09:43 Mocsta wrote: Lower Priority Reads Skanjabs I would like him to detail his scum read on Coag more. I am concerned not by him not being able to explain his read; but moreso, why he even started considering Coag in the first place. This is his only reasoning for me being his 3rd highest scumread. It's that I said I think coag is scum. Coag, who is his second highest scumread (Also for terrible reasoning, as kush has pointed out). This logic does not make sense from a town perspective, and is incredibly weak. On January 29 2014 09:43 Mocsta wrote: Oats I dont know what I want out of you, and I don't know how to approach. Somethings you have done I thought are quite townie (i.e. emotionally invested in the game); than there is stuff like outing the PM circle which I cant comprehend as a town action. You have played with Skanjab and Coag. What is your read on those 2 players? For Oats, he gives this pile of ass. "You have done some very townie things, but then you did this one thing that I don't see town doing" A completely null read. The thing that he gives Oats a townread for isn't even a town-tell. Scum and town can both be emotionally invested in the game, and Oats as scum HAS been emotionally invested in the past. He ends this off with an incredibly easy to answer question, which would serve to remove his "suspicion" from Oats. I can definitely see these two as a scumteam. But I'll save the connection stuff for after Mocsta flips. On January 29 2014 09:43 Mocsta wrote: Balla24 I know you had an early scum read on me, and started ignoring me. Without being able to talk to you I have no way to read you; and your activity seems to have dropped recently. Everyone I trust thinks you are town though so I am giving you some benefit of the doubt. This will only hold for so long though without new discussion between us. Can you please update me with your read on Oats. Also, what do you make of the VE kill? -Says his activity seems to have dropped, just as bum's has. For bum, he thinks that "after an active start, he has taken a backseat to the game" and that this "makes a lot of sense as scum." But for Balla, this very same thing is a null-tell, because other people think he is town? This does not make logical sense unless he is fabricating reasoning for Bum being scum. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 21:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: If you want to troll the shit out of a game do it in the OMGUS.net and don't bring it here please. Yeah just completely ignore the case i posted. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote: Explain why it doesnt make sense from a town perspective, and moreso why it is weak. I have a specific reason why Coag came into my mind. You instead randomly conjure him as a scumread -- one that I think is accurate as well. In my quote I actually argue your sentence actually applies to yourself. It's very obvious why this is weak. And it does not make sense from a town perspective because you say right here that you are suspicious of me because I started considering coag scum. not because I didn't give reasoning. It makes no sense for a townie to be suspicious of someone ONLY because they think the same person is scum, that's not logical. On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote: I dont give a shit how Oats plays on OMGUS. He has a commonly accepted specific meta tell to his scum play and that is emotional investment. Again refer to PyP LoL, a game where Coag, oats and myself were all scum. oats was lynched BECAUSE of emotional investment. Wait what? This is a direct contradiction to what you just said before. You just said that "Some things that Oats have done you consider quite townie (I.e. emotionally invested in the game) And now you are saying that his emotional investment is a SCUMTELL? You've slipped, dear, the cracks are starting to show, you're contradicting yourself. On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote: The most interesting thing I see here is the bolded, specifically: the scum team according to you is Coag, myself and now Oatsmaster. Please outline why Oatsmaster is scum as this is the first I have heard of it from you. How are Bum and Balla following similar paths in this game. You are cherry picking phrases to mix apples and oranges. If you need it paraphrased: I state that I can't get an updated read on Balla because hes ignoring me. If this continues into Day2 I will find it scummy he is avoiding me. Bum's activity level has dropped, according to you. Balla's activity level has dropped, according to you. I'm mixing apples with apples and you're trying to convince me that I'm wrong on my fruit. On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote: The icing on the cake: Explain. An easy statement backed up by nothing. It is up to the person making the claim to provide evidence. You lied about Coag's meta. Now when I call you out on the lie (which is very obvious, because I (and kush) have played many more games with Coag than you have, and we both agree that your meta point is wrong) you tell me to provide evidence? (1) That's silly, and thats not how claims work. (2) Kush has already provided this evidence for you. Baby seals pls. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 22:44 kushm4sta wrote: imo skanjab isn't defending coag. he is recognizing coag as an unreadable problem who he has indescribable scumfeels for. That is all town can expect to do in regards to coag! he is unreadable as fuck. That seems way townier than what mocsta is doing, which is justify his scumread with weak, untrue meta. Pretty much this, exactly. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
GG Scum caught, champagne for everyone | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 29 2014 23:08 Mocsta wrote: Sounds to me, you are making the excuse to not answer my question. Your questions have been answered, stop deflecting. And your meta thing on coag is wrong, sorry. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Is today's lynch not plurality? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
You're supposed to wait for a claim at least, or at least wait for him to respond so we can get better reads. You guys are awful. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
mm yeah i bet your counters get all dirty when youre done drinking from your glass oh yeah you wish you had coasters right now dont you? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Because me pointed out how he can't do basic maths is scummy. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 30 2014 20:11 thrawn2112 wrote: because u dont have shit to say about anything going on? adn you think math is more imprtant than finding scum? Learn to read, I've commented about what is going on. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Really though, why is Mocsta probably town, bum? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
##Vote: Mocsta | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Also, does anyone else want to talk to me? Now that kush is dead I'm all alone, surrounded by betrayers and lurkerscum. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 31 2014 19:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: What are your thoughts on the bum log? I feel he's a tad scummy in them, but the contradictions and stuff can all be indicative of a townie that hasn't been reading, too. I can see it going both ways. Because I think there is like, a 2% chance that Bum and Balla are scum together, I'm leaning heavily on the side of "townie that hasn't been reading". rayn why do you think Mocsta is town? Could you comment on the points against him please? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 31 2014 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: You guys are seriously really bad at mafia if you think one post or "case" that's never followed up in any way in the whole game makes those two people "2% chance to be mafia together". Like do you think mafia is nover "suspicious" of other mafia? That was not even a fucking bus, it was a retarded comment that bumatlarge never ever never followed up. He has never even talked about Balla after that. NEVER. Look at their interactions: + Show Spoiler + On January 26 2014 16:22 Balla24 wrote: You said you wanted to put a lot of stock into who votes for who. My first thought is: - He wants to deduce relationships between people. So I then think, well relationships are useless between unflipped players, so he must be planning on lynching a mayoral candidate (someone who was garnering votes) to be able to see if there might be scum-scum votes or the like. I don't see how that's a strange thing to think about, so I asked you. On January 26 2014 16:23 Balla24 wrote: Wasn't at all my thought. See above for my thought process. It is very unlikely that a scumteam would make up a conversation, and then talk about it in this much detail to call each other scummy. But we do need to see the logs between them, Bum can you post the logs between you and Balla, please? I agree with you on thrawn, rayn, I think he scum. Along with Mocsta and one of Alaka/Coag. That's my bragging rights scumteam bet. You also haven't answered my question on Mocsta. Could you please do so, and also look at his balla read, especially in that awful case post that me and kush destroyed the other day. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Why isn't thrawn scum, Oats? And why did you just call rayn town and scum in the same post | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Rayn lets just kill Coag, he can't stay around until LYLO like this, and he isn't going to start playing anytime soon. Add this to the fact that he's scum, because my feels tell me so. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Babies or the flashy round one, either works. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On February 01 2014 04:12 bumatlarge wrote: And what will you do if he posts it? Remove all our votes because it confirms him as town | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
The different in those lynches is hilarious, though, as is Coag voting himself twice in a row. He was playing pro-town by doing that at least | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
Woo. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On February 01 2014 04:19 bumatlarge wrote: Skan, Grack, Slam when coag flips town Bum what's your bet for the remaining scumteam now that coag has flipped scum? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On February 01 2014 05:59 bumatlarge wrote: Whatever I feel like. Good on you guys though, I thought for sure that you can grack were shoving a misltnch down everyone's throats. I'm all ears for what you remaining scum team ideas are. What do you think of Moc/Thrawn? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
But this! Evidence! Ooh, rayn, you've got some 'splanin to do. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On February 02 2014 18:18 Mocsta wrote: Rayn... stop wasting ya time. Bum is not scum Huh? Unless you're being a sarcastic assclown. ##Vote: Mocsta | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On February 02 2014 18:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: Skanjabs why did you not give me any of your PM's after you promised to do so? Also why did you not read the Mocsta log after you asked me to give it to you? Yes, i can see from the tinypaste you have not read it. Dude, I'm like, a 5th of the way through. It is so goddamn massive. I'll finish it by today, and I'll give you my PM's when I've done so. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
01[04:47] <raynpelikoneet> and i don't know some other person/people [04:47] <Mocsta> it was Bh/ "X" [04:47] <Mocsta> then "x" invited me part. So fuck you with your lies. | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
rayn who do you think is bum's partner? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
| ||
| ||
