|
"How to pressure; A guide by Hopeless"
1) Vote ur target
2) Tell them to post seals and abandon thread
3) Flame their play
+ Show Spoiler [1] +On January 16 2014 11:11 Hopeless1der wrote:I call your bluff ##Vote: Grackaroni
+ Show Spoiler [2] +On January 16 2014 11:30 Hopeless1der wrote:
this is the part where you post seals and peace out of the thread grack
+ Show Spoiler [3] +On January 16 2014 11:37 Hopeless1der wrote:
because you've self voted and followed up with complete nonsense for no discernible purpose than to make noise.
No need for much else 
|
On January 16 2014 16:00 Skanjab1s wrote:
Hiii. I'd be delighted if you kittens could indulge me in a brief questionnaire, it'll only take a little of your time.
(1) Do you prefer to play as town or scum?
(2) What will you be remembered for this game?
(3) How do you react to pressure?
(4) Is your play usually emotional, or reserved?
Joke answers = Totally scum, by the way.
1) I generally enjoyed my town games more than my singular replacement into a maf game
2) dafuq would I know?
3) Depends is a horrible cop-out answer everybody puts forth. I usually just OMGUS cuz omgus. Or whine a lot.
4) Tears, tears everywhere
Aaaaand in other news I certainly hope you aren't counting on this or your romp through my filter as "contributions".
|
On January 17 2014 00:35 Hopeless1der wrote:
Toad, comment on why skanjab's case is bullshit as per rayn's discussion. One of you is wrong. Explain why.
Hopeless, stop 1-liner sniping from the sidelines and do some legwork yourself.
Image macro's are worse than 1-liners. You work hard enough to find/generate an image macro but are too fucking lazy to do anything that could be construed as hunting scum. That doesn't make a ton of sense.
Unless theres a good reason you don't want to take a stance on anything in-game? Oh yeah, cuz ur scum.
|
On January 17 2014 01:07 Skanjab1s wrote:Oh wow, rayn, you actually think I'm opting out of discussion? Really? Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 01:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Ugh.. this is gonna be really hard to figure out because Skanjab1s made a terrible terrible case on yamato in Hogwarts aswell. As sad it is he could do this as town..  Making opening cases on people and then getting called scum for it is what I do, yo.Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 01:03 Hopeless1der wrote:
Yes I was intentionally lying skan, see my followup post.
I find it hilarious you think rayn CANT get you lynched. Trololol He can't. I mean, he's welcome to try, but it wont work.
This sounds a lot like "I intentionally made a worthless case cuz its my town meta and I gotta match that".
Which sounds a lot like scum :/
|
Well I was starting to think that you might have just been trying to get the thread moving and fishing for responses, which would be quite understandable, but instead it seems that you actually think I'm scum or something.
Jeeeeez.
|
Kush has... a reputation. And a few of my most recent games have had kush in them.
Kush felt immediately different from the other games I'd played with him (towngames as I recall) so I called him on it. I'm not gonna bust out the meta "omg kush scum" on page 2 of the game or whatever but it struck me weird and I wanted to see what he said and what others said about it.
Everybody else promptly ignored it and kush's response was "Everybody thinks they r a kush expert" or something. Hardly very convincing, but I haven't played at all in quite a while and kush sounded like this was a sore point for him so I let it be.
|
LMAO
See that latter one is EXACTLY the kush I was expecting and didn't get.
|
On January 17 2014 03:12 Skanjab1s wrote:
i need to organize my nightkill candidates
wat?
|
Soooooo I'm scum because of Diction and because my reaction to scummy posts from skan is a "gross face".
Sigh, I was hoping for a productive day 1.
At least Mig is here and playing finally. I believe that means everybody has posted at least once.
|
I'm far from certain either way.
I have my suspicions but in the name of not just ramrodding the first person mentioned I try to give everybody the benefit of the doubt. Innocent until proven scum or whatever. So I look for ways that person's actions could be construed as town and as scum, and see which one makes the most sense. I'll admit my word choice may have been lacking but basically it boiled down to "well this could have been a helpful town play but it isn't so either he's bad town or scum" which unfortunately is something I'm excessively bad at figuring out (especially day 1). I'm also well aware that a large part of my distaste for him is simple OMGUS so I'm trying to work through that as well.
So when the ONLY thing being discussed in the thread is skanjab's case on me, I'm willing to put in my side and call out skanjab, but I feel like its important to look at both sides of the coin.
|
On January 17 2014 04:02 Mig wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2014 03:56 Sn0_Man wrote:
At least Mig is here and playing finally. I believe that means everybody has posted at least once. Also, not even sure why you mentioned this. A lot of the things you say feel fake to me. Saying you were "hoping for a productive day1". We arent even 24 hours in yet. Just feels like bs.
I was actually waiting for you to post specifically because everybody else had. Its hard to look at the list of players and start deciding who could be scum and who couldn't and who I should be analyzing to lynch when there are people with exactly zero posts.
I mean, Grack and Vayne still haven't contributed anything but thats something I can judge them on at least.
When all of day 1 is discussing me, hows that help us find scum? Literally the vast majority of this 20 hour old game has been skanjab's stupid case and then bickering over word choice. Plus its incredibly difficult to look analytically and clearly at cases calling ME scum and try to figure out who has scum motivations for their posts and who doesnt.
|
Cases on me are always such bullshit.
"Omg Sn0 joked about lynching the host cuz he fucked up the daypost. Obvious scum too much flippancy"
followed by
"Omg Sn0 insufficiently flippant this game. Obvious scum too much srs"
get real.
|
On January 17 2014 04:21 Mig wrote:
Anyway sno, who do you think is scum? Saying everyone focusing you isn't productive is bullshit. The way people go about pressuring/building their cases shows you a lot about alignment.
Half the thread could be scum. Actually more than half. I still don't have anything I think is worth putting together into a concentrated effort to lynch. As you are so eager to point out, its still somewhat early day 1.
Like, if I had to snap-lynch somebody right now it would probably actually be grack, but thats mostly because I prefer lurker lynches day 1. In terms of who is most likely to be scum, Hopeless i guess, skan/kush are up there too. Day 1 sucks.
People making cases on me makes it a fuckton harder for ME to read the thread as mentioned because not only does a ton of bias creep in to my reads whenever it happens, but also it competes with discussions that are actually geared towards catching scum. So I dislike it, especially when they are so ridiculous.
|
Tell you what mig, even if you are certain I'm scum there are at least 2 more scum out there plus or minus a serial killer. Who else is anti-town and why?
You've jumped into the thread and spoke of nothing except "omg sno scum lynchzorz". I'd like something more to read YOU by if you would be so kind.
|
...
Well what a fount of helpful wisdom you are. Such daring insight.
|
|
|
OK come on.
I've been posting, pointing out inconsistencies that I see, demonstrably showing how my reads are developing on Hopeless, Skanjab, etc. I haven't exactly nailed scum yet but I'm trying to be transparent and keep the thread moving in a positive direction.
You drop into the thread, blast the current most popular target, then toss out "oh yeah and those 2 lurkers must be the other scum cuz I'm too lazy to come up with anything else".
|
|
|
On January 17 2014 05:33 thrawn2112 wrote:
hi! awake.
koshi so scummy
Tell me more
On January 17 2014 05:33 VayneAuthority wrote:
hmm thread is a mess but learned some useful things
u2
|
On January 17 2014 05:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
don't want to disturb the natural habitat, small games are the easiest to employ my scumhunting strategies
If this is that fucking "the first person to accuse me is scum" thing again...
That game was so painful T_T
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
