|
On May 24 2014 06:27 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 06:26 Blazinghand wrote: So, I'm not gonna reveal how I know this, but I know this and people need to know it. This is what I got:
You can be controlled by a djinn
I don't know what the connotations etc of that are. Maybe a djinn is a player, or an ability, or whatever, but it's possible to be controlled by a djinn. Is this alignment changing or is it your vote, or your actions, or some combination? Again, I don't know. All I know is what is bolded. That's crazy. If it's true I'm pretty sure that someone can use you as a bullet to kp someone else.
Scumeling, can you explain this?
|
It sounds kind of ridiculous to link yourself as town&town or scum&scum with someone if they're both indeed scum.
|
I don't think it's recruiting, I think it's something more.... temporary? Don't ask me why I have this idea. But it's based on facts.
|
Steveling: can you please explain that bullet thing? Where did you base that on?
|
In fact I'm 99% sure that it isn't recruiting. Just take my word for it. It wouldn't really make any sense combined with some information I have.
|
Urgh, I'd kind of want to reveal more stuff, but I have some bad experiences regarding that (from Nuclear Winter Mafia). Just remember that the control stuff is almost certainly something temporary / not so dramatic as recruiting.
|
I don't think it's like that either. Most likely it's some kind of a win condition like "have X amount of players under control" and you can take control of a player each night. I don't think there's any dramatic effect for being under control though.
|
Wat. Or maybe I was wrong. I'm completely confused by some stuff.
|
|
thrawn has really been under the radar so far. He could be scum (or some anti-town faction).
|
If there's another Isaac out there, wouldn't he just counterclaim to get the easy lynch on BH?
|
Not if the Isaac-controller-thing-player is lynched?
|
LOL Slam.... That was a smooth move....
|
Yeah, let's lynch a powerful town role because scum might be able to control his power or something >.>
|
|
mtamburini: You've been here today and commented on some stuff. Could you actually scumhunt or something in that direction? Have you even caught up with the thread yet?
|
For example, mtamburini: what do you think about Valenius/kush/jampidampi?
|
I think I can vote for kush atm.
Vote: kushm4sta
|
Somehow this doesn't feel like it's coming from town:
On May 24 2014 06:46 kushm4sta wrote: wat there is recruitment this game also??? are you fucking kidding me. scumhunting is 100% useless so good luck with that
It's a totally useless message that actually even pushes scum agenda. Is this something that a townie would say?
|
On May 24 2014 07:47 mtamburini wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2014 07:38 Xatalos wrote: mtamburini: You've been here today and commented on some stuff. Could you actually scumhunt or something in that direction? Have you even caught up with the thread yet? Just trying to understand the conversations that are going on right now, not sure what to make of it. Have not caught up yet but working on it. I plan to be caught up sometime tomorrow evening around the 24 hours mark I need to go to sleep in a couple hours I have work early tomorrow morning. With this being only an allignemnt flip game Im having trouble taking into consideration why certain people die over others (IE softing roles for example) All I can base the town kills off of are the scum thought they were the most towny people playing or if a town role decided to shoot them because they thought they were scummy. As far as I know no one has claimed any shots just yet so Im going to assume Scum have a Kp of 3 so there might be only one non town aligned factioned that is non threatening. With regards to the koshi death the same logic applies with the town people dying, did another faction think they were acting really town and shot him or did a town PR shoot him thinking he was scummy. Its hard to me do decipher information by the way the posts are being written, it seems like someone is writing up minutes to a meeting of what each person said. Its feel like were all conversing at a round table and there is bickering back and forth between parties. Almost like video mafia except I cant get any body reads of facial reactions from anyone.
You should make catching up and forming reads your top priority. It's not very constructive to read the latest pages and just make vague comments.
|
|
|
|