Hope the fuck to god that I don't wake up lynched in the morning.

Holyflare, unvoted because that last analysis of yours is the post that made the most sense to me since the beginnig of the game.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 04:37 GMT

#379

Guys, Derrida confirmed town, come on. I wish posting screenshots of inbox was not banned.

Aside from that, I am trying to read through the other games you guys played together, which is a stupidly enormous task on its own, it's like playing 3-4 mafia games simultaneously. As I'm the newbie here, could someone summarize me why a player's attitude in previous games matter? I would assume we are all above-average intelligent people here who could take on a new persona in every new game, no?

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 13:25 GMT

#419

Woops, that makes four I guess

Go get the pitchforks!

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 13:30 GMT

#421

Hm? "with 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch" and there are currently 4 votes on Mocsta? It means I am pointing out that he gets lynched?

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 13:32 GMT

#422

Anyway I think Mocsta is town because this selfvote coincides with this post in the other mafia game. He just wants to get out of this game and focus on that one.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 20:19 GMT

#461

On January 12 2014 03:35 Giggletummy wrote:
I would argue, and have argued, that a town player is more likely to not want to play than a scum player. So I do think it points more towards town than scum. You may disagree, and do.

I recognize that I am likely overvaluing that argument, but I do stand by it.

Completely agree. This bandwagon on Mocsta is starting to feel increasingly scummy.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 23:03 GMT

#474

Let's get this game moving.

##vote Mocsta

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 23:16 GMT

#479

Yeah I'm just curious.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 23:49 GMT

#483

AHA!

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 23:49 GMT

#484

Rofl, well if that doesn't make me confirmed townie I don't know what does.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 23:55 GMT

#488

Intoxication may lead one to do awesome things. Still, I think no scum would cast the final vote in this setting. Anyway, I hope we don't have 6 hour night, I need to re-read filters before I submit my night action.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 11 2014 23:59 GMT

#490

Maybe I should really play this game always under the influence. Hahahah I would surely never ever vote Mocsta if I was sober. Need to reread filters in the morning.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 12 2014 00:05 GMT

#493

sorry about this small derail, but how long does that take you to put together Artanis? God damn continental European education system, I can't even write a poem in my native language let alone a second language.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 12 2014 00:12 GMT

#498

I would argue that we need to look at people who voted first or second on Mocsta, or didn't vote him at all (though i think this is less likely). From my first game as scum, I think the scum reflex would make it so that if there was a strong case being built against Mocsta the other scum would jump on the bandwagon early on. 3rd vote is just too dangerous, and 4th vote is me.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 12 2014 00:21 GMT

#501

Well I guess because the natural initial reaction after lynch would be to look at who has not voted to lynch the scum, no?

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 12 2014 13:53 GMT

#533

requesting to be replaced, i will not have access to computer for at least a few days, family emergency (nothing too terrible). i apologize to the host and the players for the inconvenience.