|
On January 08 2014 01:32 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 01:31 Corazon wrote: Why don't we lynch Yamato? His filter is 2 pages of absolutely nothing. So is my filter basically and we shouldn't lynch me No, go look at Yamato's filter. I just looked at yours and you have a few good posts talking about gumshoe. Yamato literally has nothing.
|
On January 08 2014 01:40 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 01:38 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 01:32 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 08 2014 01:31 Corazon wrote: Why don't we lynch Yamato? His filter is 2 pages of absolutely nothing. So is my filter basically and we shouldn't lynch me No, go look at Yamato's filter. I just looked at yours and you have a few good posts talking about gumshoe. Yamato literally has nothing. useless Yamato = scum yamato? If only I had a flip in a certain game for reference... ugh Two pages and 0 content from them? Yamato ≠ Kush and that's why I find him scummy. I would expect him to be calling people out for the right reasons about now. All he has done is call Rayn "cavalier" in a very hypocritical way.
|
|
On January 08 2014 01:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:I see walls of text on the first page, looks opposite to this game lol Yeah but he does that every game as town as well. His filter should be a point against him in this game as well.
Also, he starts accusing me of the same stuff that he was doing. I saw a parallel in that to when he called Rayn "cavalier".
|
WBG are you planning on throwing your weight around with your votes, or is this just a pressure vote? As a vetera
|
T.T
as a Veteran who has (probably) played with Kush multiple times, do you really think voting for him like that will get anything useful out of him?
|
Well I cannot have a productive conversation with you because all you say is that you are going to read more and then throw a useless pressure vote on Kush.
I need that contribution from you first before we can have a meaningful conversation. This isn't a one-way street.
|
On January 08 2014 04:40 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 04:36 Corazon wrote: Well I cannot have a productive conversation with you because all you say is that you are going to read more and then throw a useless pressure vote on Kush.
I need that contribution from you first before we can have a meaningful conversation. This isn't a one-way street. You seem to lack reading comprehension. We can do the "no you first' thing all day, but if this is the best you can offer then I have no real reason to keep talking to you. It isn't a personal thing, it's just that talking to someone who doesn't know how to further conversation is probably a dead-end at best. I offered you the chance at elucidating your current thoughts. They don't even have to be detailed. If you don't want to do even that then I can't be bothered to share more with you, since I have no clue whether sharing my current thoughts is even a good idea if I don't get decent information in return. Why should I let scum have a head start into knowing whom I suspect so early, if it doesn't particularly benefit me? It only changes their behaviour when they know who is specifically under scrutiny. Read my filter. Read the game. You would see that I already have given my opinions on certain people (Yamato). Please don't come back and post again until you have read through the whole game, please.
|
Whatever, WBG. If you don't want to contribute, don't complain when you get lynched.
|
Hey Kush, let's lynch WBG. Maybe he can call you dumb too.
##unvote ##vote: WBG
|
WBG:
-asks me to be productive and post when i was being way more productive than him -refuses to share his reads -starts having a back and forth war with JAT for no reason -votes for kush then calls him town
This guy scum.
|
On January 08 2014 09:23 wherebugsgo wrote: whoops
##unvote
##vote Corazon There's this thing that you can do that allows you to play mafia without being at your computer the whole time. It's called reading. You should try it sometime.
|
It's hard to talk to you, WBG. You act like a giant dickwad when some disagrees with you.
|
On January 08 2014 04:33 wherebugsgo wrote: There are certain questions that, if answered, completely defeat the purpose of particular plays.
If you want to figure out my alignment for yourself it's probably a better idea to give me something better to work with. Why don't you comment on the game, or try to have a different conversation with me? If I can get some sort of insight into your current thoughts, e.g. what players you are currently looking at-you don't even have to particularly elucidate your reads-or, say, things you are worried about, or players you think are playing in a manner inconsistent to their norm, then I can have a fruitful conversation with you that can be alignment-enlightening in multiple ways.
"I don't want to share any information without you sharing some first, even though you have already shared a page worth of filter"
That's pretty scummy bro. You're trying to put the impetus on me to share (which I already had done) to give yourself an excuse for not having read the thread and to not share your opinions.
A town player would be proactive and try to share their thoughts without going "you first". That's why this makes you scum.
|
You're just throwing your vote around to look like you are doing something productive when your two votes are on a lurker who you just said was town (Kush), and an OMGUS (me).
The rest of your filter is you being a dick towards kush and I, along with some theory debate with JAT.
|
|
There is a difference between not saying everything is on your mind and deliberately not saying anything at all. It doesn't matter what question I would've asked you, would you really divulge your true feelings about it if you played by this creed?
|
On January 08 2014 10:03 wherebugsgo wrote: so apparently I have deliberately not said anything at all.
And Corazon says I don't read.
Stop trying to twist the facts. I'm talking about when you made the post saying you required contribution from me before you contributed.
|
On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote: and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it.
To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive.
|
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post.
|
|
|
|