[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 17

On January 29 2014 05:18 Foolishness wrote:

Yes I did that on purpose. I made no mention of Austin anywhere in my posts yet Austin looks like he's taking the information I provided and is trying to draw conclusions, while Marv is just trying to debunk everything I say (instead of say, analyzing the Promethelax case and looking for connections to the last mafia). Austin knows he's innocent so he didn't read at all into the fact that his name wasn't mentioned, because that wasn't on his mind. Marv noticed it in particular because he knows he's guilty.

On January 29 2014 05:33 Foolishness wrote:

Sure, and I understand that. I didn't really have much room to work with on that front. But on the page after I posted my analysis Marv makes this post:

Read this post carefully and you'll realize that there's something wrong. This is not a Marv town post. In particular I feel that his first three sentences show that he's mafia. He says: "They look fine. Mostly everything looks fine. The issue is, the conclusions are wrong."

How can the analysis be right but the conclusions be wrong? That's saying, "oh Foolishness you're right, Promethelax is not playing his town game, definitely is pushing a mafia agenda, does not care about the town lynches and only his survival, he has the really bad vote posts which shows that he's pushing an agenda....but he's town". What?!? That's not a town way of thinking at all. If a town looks at my post about Promethelax and disagrees with it he's going to point out the flaws in my logic: "actually his voting could have been from a town perspective because X and Y" or "that Promethelax post could have come from town Promethelax because look at his other town games where he did something similar". Something to that effect. A town isn't going to look at that and be like, "yup, Foolishness does perfect analysis except he drew the wrong conclusions".

Even so, why is Marv going out of his way to defend Promethelax? The thoughts don't line up. I'd guess he'd start making connections between Promethelax and other players ("well I know I'm town and Foolishness's analysis looks pretty good so gotta find the remaining mafia") or just defend himself ("well I know I'm town and Foolishness is implying that I'm the last mafia. I can prove my innocence so something is wrong here"). Perhaps these are wifom arguments, but Marv's line of thinking is not consistent.

And to address what he said here, sure it's a good point to make about Promethelax's ego. But that can only explain so much. That doesn't address why he's not interested in the town lynches, why he made a strange list without incriminating anyone (and why Marv wasn't on that list). Second, if Promethelax does have an ego I'd expect him to vote for who he thinks is mafia above all instead of going with Gonzaw.

On January 29 2014 06:20 WaveofShadow wrote:

Is foolishness known for making towncases? Be honest.
Although considering his towncases and mafiacases have flipped exactly in this game I don't even know what anymore.

KISS says foolishness should have been lynched twice so we lynch him.
To some degree I also want to say KISS says the effort he put in with his essays makes him town but the WAY in which those were done makes me say no.

Vote stays

On January 29 2014 06:25 WaveofShadow wrote:
I really hate austins sudden townread. Did you read what I wrote?

On January 29 2014 06:56 austinmcc wrote:
Don't read the votes then. Read marv's comments on Sandroba D1, and his comments on Foolishness D1.

Then tell me if you understand why I would ask him about that vote when he tells me to vote the strongest scumread.

On January 29 2014 06:57 kitaman27 wrote:
Suppose we had a hypothetical situation where I wouldn't want to lynch Prom, but I'd consider marv. Otherwise, I'd vote foolishness. Show of hands, who would support that and who would oppose it?

Brb, 45 mins.