EPTTL Mafia LXIV: A Game of Intrigue - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 11 2014 17:44 yamato77 wrote: Why do you think gumshoe is town? Because he said "vote me for mayor because i am so bad".  On January 11 2014 17:45 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm supporting DocH because I like the way he's approached the game so far. While it's true that he hasn't discussed his reads or anything yet, I still feel it's relatively early and he's gonna have to if he hopes to ACTUALLY be elected for obvious reasons. If I don't like what he has to say then, I'm free to change my vote as far as I know. Until then, I'm picking up what he's laying down and can get behind him as mayor. Tell me, does it seem like DrH is interested in finding mafia and if your answer is yes, which posts of his contribute towards scumhunting? If the answer is no, why are you supporting him again? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I think a mafia mayor will go with some sort of platform that seems safe, bank on their veteran status if they have it, promise good scumhunting and then not follow through. Waste the actual benefits of the position itself. is the closest thing to characterize DrH's play atm. Talk about general stuff, setup, mayor powers and "how to use them". Not scumhunting. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I can promise you that viewpoint is not connected to my alignment in any way. That's my point. Town wants a townie mayor. You havn't done scumhunting yet, you yourself said so. Why are people backing you up on your campaign? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I am more interested in people who are backing you up in your campaign because you have "so really good contributions" when i feel like they are not good. Everything that is not finding mafia is not good. There is no need for campaigns and shit, lynching mafia is the only thing mayor should do, every day. Like other townies. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
In the last game BH wanted to policy lynch someone who would not contribute. He was confirmed town in that game and did nothing but wanted to policy lynch a lurker, all game. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I want you to explain why: 1) BH's policy makes him suspicious 2) Why Mocsta trolling makes him scum 3) Why marv's "non-caringness" makes him scum | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
That is calling him mafia. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 11 2014 09:37 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Why should we policy lynch a player day 1 just because you alone have a hard time dealing with them being in the game? If this was your intention, did you mention it before the beginning? I would say that this is an attempt to make the thread discussion worthless but you're not dumb enough to think that the town is going to be on board with that lynch, or that in the 48 hours that pass from now the discussion will still be seriously centered around a lynch on kush. So you might as well say now exactly what you're getting at - if what you're getting at is that no matter what happens at the end of this day, you would still lynch kush regardless, then whoever is elected should lynch you immediately. You literally said so. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 11 2014 18:19 VisceraEyes wrote: The bolded is patently false. There's nothing wrong with discussing reads in PMs with others. It becomes a problem if the conclusions you draw never see the thread and you act on them, but the act itself isn't anti-town in the slightest. Rayn I really hope you're just like drunk or something. What do you expect people to do in PMs if not discuss reads? No, there is no reason to discuss reads - especially scumreads - in PM's when you can do that in thread and make everyone see your thought process. It's anti-town, on D1. Period. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 11 2014 18:19 yamato77 wrote: If Moc does not stop trolling, we will kill him. If he's town and doing this, he knows this. If he doesn't want to play the game, he should be obliged. That's true. It doesn't mean his trolling at the start of the game makes him mafia and the discussion about this is pointless. He either starts playing or gets killed. Case closed. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Let's say you post very little and are really active in PM-land. When the lynch comes, the mayor who's gonna get elected has you as scumread. They say "i'll be lynching X because he is not playing the game and he is useless". Then people go "nono, he's really townie in PM's - look, he has these good reads on Z, A, B, K, S." You then need to re-judge your stance on them and find anohter lynch. Why? Was there some ultimate big plan reasoning to NOT be in thread discussing thse reads? Not with one person, but with anyone. How is that townie? I just can't fucking see it and i hate when people do it because it's scummy or really stupid. PM's should be used when there is a reason to use them. Discussing scumreads on D1 is not the reason. A question, what do you think of Xatalos? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Whatever. ##Vote: yamato77 Obviously town and will most likely listen to me and lynch mafia. DrH will fail. | ||
| ||
