On December 01 2013 04:56 gtrsrs wrote:
also since a lot of you are more experienced or adamant about this game and the order, i'll pick somewhat low numbers so i don't harsh your vibe

sorry for the terrible post but seeing as most of the posts so far have also been terrible i don't feel so bad.

On December 01 2013 16:26 gtrsrs wrote:
perhaps i don't quite understand the roles, but bum, how are kha'zix and viktor not in any of your lists? based on what we know of kha in the game he's got mobility, invisibility, and high damage. i'm sure he'll have some pretty lethal abilities by day 4/5. i believe that he should be a priority pick for town, just to deny him from mafia, yes? and aren't inventor roles pretty strong in a game like this? allows us to give "vanillas" some better abilities (or at least further empower our best players, no?).

Into asserting himself:

On December 02 2013 10:12 gtrsrs wrote:
whoever takes kha'zix before me is scum

On December 02 2013 14:39 gtrsrs wrote:
so who took kha'zix? i declared that i was taking him and so you are scum for taking him. please come forward so i can lynch you

It's totally illogical to go "picking low numbers because I suck" ---> "if you picked my role you are mafia".

I also hated this post at the time

On December 02 2013 02:18 gtrsrs wrote:

Show nested quote +

is there any way we can cut these posts out? not really adding much to the game. makes me lose focus when trying to catch up. did i read the page where X lol'd at Y? did i read the page where Y lol'd back at X? it's a huge turnoff and i don't want to say it looks scummy but it makes me want to vote for people spamming this shit just so we don't have to read it all game

I generally get the sentiment of spam = bad, it's just out of place given the thread wasn't really a shitfest anyway, and he has so few posts that he's wasting one on a post like this. Especially the wording "I don't want to say it looks scummy" ---> "but it makes me want to vote for people spamming this shit". Over the top and illogical. Yuckityyuck.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 11:42 GMT

#1229

gtrsrs is the kind of player that Ver in that big analysis would be going "scum scum scum!" for talking himself down but it's never that easy.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 11:49 GMT

#1232

Which game was that Kurumi?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 11:53 GMT

#1234

Yeah... that filter makes his play here look even worse.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 11:55 GMT

#1235

On December 02 2013 15:23 Mocsta wrote:

I got nothing.. I think his position is reasonable.

This is interesting, isn't it?

All the other VT claims I've noted down have actually had SOME kind of power (50 kp, or Oats' list change?)

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:03 GMT

#1237

On December 02 2013 21:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes that is indeed really weird. But if he got 50 KP or something why would he lie about it?

Or he's mafia and he doesn't want to claim his role and claimed VT and didn't think through that other VT claims actually have some sort of power

Mocsta is looking kinda not-good to me already.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:05 GMT

#1238

I should add - not only for that, although that helps niggle away at me. From what I've read so far, I'm not a fan of how he answered/analysed the list of players you gave him, and his question to VE re: Kenpachi felt weird as well. Defence of gtrsrs was also quite dodgy.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:06 GMT

#1239

Oh, and I also detested his pseudo town-claim that he made after that list he gave and you said they were all town - "I just mislynched in MYLO, forgive me if i'm a bit careful" or whatever the words were. That was really bad.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:10 GMT

#1241

yeah, the claim was just something that made me take notice of him really. (as above 2 posts)

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:14 GMT

#1244

Well, I managed to miss that. Thanks Koshi.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:15 GMT

#1246

On December 02 2013 16:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
All roffles does is setup speculate and then call out jay for actually doing something else, like attacking marv. Now, i think that Jay's reasoning is bullshit but it doesnt make Jay scum. He's calling Jay bad not scum. It kinda looks like he's going through Jay's filter and looking for all the things that are bad play rather than actually trying to find scummy behavior.

This post makes me like Oats for town, it's observant. Roffles has indeed done a lot of aloof commentating/defending without pushing anything forwards.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:23 GMT

#1248

VT isn't CCable?

wat

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:25 GMT

#1249

By the way, rayn, I do basically agree with you that it isn't really possible to have a proper read on VE from N0 - but I do also think that MZ is the type of player who would think that he could. If that makes sense.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:34 GMT

#1252

Just got to bumandlarge's case. It was much better/more persuasive than I expected it to be. Pretty nice actually.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:36 GMT

#1254

You chose a boring role on purpose jat? What are you saying there?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:43 GMT

#1256

Alright, I'm caught up. General roundup musings.

jcarl looks bad as per bum's case. I have nothing to add.
Rean started off super-loud but has fallen away. Why?
gtrsrs's posts look bad, his meta makes him look bad.
Don't like Mocsta for reasons I already mentioned, his shit with MZ also looks ridiculous.
jay's bullshitting his read on me, he can die for it probably.

Other people are town or dunno.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:51 GMT

#1258

I've basically disagreed with most of the content of LSB's posts as far as I remember (ref: when to claim etc) and he said he wants to go after people who wanted to ban mafia roles. It's a weird angle in general, but it's an even weirder angle for mafia to take. It's unnecessarily boatrocky and controversial. Possibly he's capable of taking such an angle as mafia, but gotta wait and see for now.

BC no idea at all, too early.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

December 02 2013 12:56 GMT

#1261

It's not that unlikely a low-ranked mafia would choose whoever the godfather champion is because why not.

With the inventor running around and every role having a 2nd unknown power, it's a pretty safe pick (the person choosing gf would also have a 2nd ability too), as there may be hidden DT roles/items.