EPT"##" Mafia - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 05:53 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I don't understand the suspicion on Koshi, to me it looks like a carbon copy of his play as town in Noir. Maybe a shade more reserved, but still relatively casual, low-content posts. All that's left is him blindly tunneling someone. It's interesting that you should bring this up - I gave koshi a contentious (contentious to me, because I felt like I was going out on a limb) townread, because I couldn't believe that Koshi would be *so* passive as mafia. And I was right. The problem is that this game feels somewhere in between, where he's not *as* passive as he was in Noir, rather just wishy washy and non-committal while perhaps trying not to look like that. It all comes down to degrees and interpretation, and my interpretation was that it wasn't the same and that it's somewhat suspicious. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 08:16 WaveofShadow wrote: Still busy for the next little bit but checking in: Didn't believe me that OOHCHILD is a smurf? The 'test' is in all likelihood a check to make sure he was posting on the right account. I wouldn't feel bad policy lynching that shit if for no other reason than to show it's doable on TL. His case goes beyond simple lurker lynch imo and would not be a bad choice. Rayn/koshi---i don't really understand how you're both so surprised about my comment. No offense but ever since Persona I've found the two of your town combination real annoying, and I was thinking that since a lot of people have scumreads on koshi it may mean they're not both town---hence the not being butt-buddies this game. Koshi's list post gives me pause however; I think he MAY be town for it but I have to gather my thoughts and still post re: Prome when I can. I may just end up on the safe route and take OOHCHILD because I'm not sold on Clarity like I've said. I'm sorry, I'm trying not to comment on too many inconsequential things, but this is ludicrous. If someone is capable of smurfing, then someone is capable of looking at the top left to see who they're signed in as rather than having to post "test". This is spectacularly dumb, Wave. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Clarity had a scumread for Oats for a good chunk of the game and Oats ended up flipping town. This is all tempo relevant, and by that I mean Clarity literally just came from a game where he read Oats as mafia and he flipped town, and Oats looks better this game. It's more than just me thinking some random player shouldn't be finding Oats scummy, it's a very specific read based on a specific game that just happened. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 09:02 WaveofShadow wrote: Really? Well I guess all of the smurfslips we've seen in past games are.....what exactly? Are people not looking at who they're signed in as. If you're thinking enough to post "test" then you're thinking enough to look at who you're signed in as. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 09:11 WaveofShadow wrote: I disagree, but like you said, inconsequential. Convince me that Clarity is scum, marv. I literally could not have said anymore, and I think it's pretty dodgy you're saying this. Stop being bad please, it's giving me scumvibes. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 09:12 WaveofShadow wrote: Too bad. If you want me to lynch your target then you should be looking to convince me, no? I'm not convinced. Be back in a little while. You, yourself, said "yuck" to Clarity's post, and since then, he just went to play dota and disappeared? Why aren't *you* convinced given what you've posted, or at least convinced enough to vote him over OOCHILD? That's really weak, WoS. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 09:11 OOHCHILD wrote: I posted "test" to determine the timezone of the time stamp that accompanies each post. Are you actually going to play the game? Why are you here exactly? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 09:16 WaveofShadow wrote: So Clarity pushing an obviously bad case makes him scum? I see the point you make regarding he should know he's bad and not push it, but I posit that it's entirely possible that, you know, he wouldn't be pushing a bad case in the first place if he was scum because it looks like shit and would cause these problems for himself. I agreed with your 'yuck' I am not convinced it's bad-scum. And yet you're convinced enough that OOCHILD would make himself blatantly voteable by doing absolutely nothing and posting shit? That's more convincing to you? Ok Wave. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 06:09 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I have said everything I need to say about the power. Patience, my son. Unless I missed it, you told us the power would go off when the countdown reached zero, which it has. So what gives? What's the state of play? If you're not sure, ask the hosts. I want to know. Also @rayn, you say you "presume" that you can't undo your power. Well, check that it went through or whatever. There's no reason for that to be left ambiguous. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 09:47 Seuss wrote: There's a notable difference between OOCHILD and Clarity_nl, effort. It takes effort to make an argument, even a bad one. It takes zero effort to do nothing and/or post utter shit. Correct, and scum are liable to put some effort in, whereas usually players who do literally nothing (hello nyxnyxnyx) are the townies. Pretty surprised you're making this argument given how your game went actually. The scummers in your game actually put in effort, bad effort. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Tbh OOHCHILD isn't a terrible lynch and my vote would probably have gravitated there if I didn't find everything Clarity has done so terrible. I just get annoyed that people won't do what I want and then I argue in a really binary fashion. Meh. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 13:30 Pandain wrote: I think he's very town but I'm not going to activate a potential scum power for him unless I'm very certain. Very townie =/= Town You are extremely, extremely suspicious for refusing to ##twerk me today. I basically couldn't be looking more town to you: On October 29 2013 05:10 Pandain wrote: Marv is striking me as very town, which is very exciting for me. Usually I would think it would be hard to read Marv since he's such a good player, but even if he's scum he's still making really good points which, as long as we continue to judge them, will work in town favor. He has also already posted 6 pages worth of shit, and they're all good. Indicative of town He really thought hard about Prom and I love what he said about Prom being way too cocky, I actually had a null read on him but now I think I have a moderate town read on him, probably not as "sure" in it as Marv. he also wasn't a dick to me Further, you say I'm "such a good player" Further further, you've been in two of my most recent towngames, where I lynched on Day 1 a vigilante (Hogwarts) and a cop (Noir). So you know *full well* that the flip on Day 1 does not decide my alignment. So why are you pretending it does? Why are you potentially witholding powers from a really strong player who's looking really town? Terrible, and suspicious. | ||
| ||
