I built a case on what I had read. From what I read, you were heavy on clarity just for that stupid thing you couldn't reconcile. You added stuff later, which I didn't really know about. That's why I misrepresented you. I correctly represented you for what I had read.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:05 GMT

#1129

From the skim it seemed like you weren't doing anything else. I do not know the quality of the rest of your actions but I haven't read your filter. And now I really have to go. I'm a terrible lynch but my activity is done until like 4 pm at least.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:13 GMT

#1136

I am a terrible lynch because I tried to clear the only alternative bandwagon. I am a terrible lynch because I have not been afraid to stick out. I am a terrible lynch because I have given plenty of opinions and also given reasons why I have those opinions.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:23 GMT

#1145

On October 30 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

I dont understand the first point. The second point doesnt really make sense to me either, thinking marv is scum is so bad, its scummy. Your opinions and reasons are bad.
Bad in a scummy way.

Last post for real.
There are two bandwagons, me and Clarity. If Clarity doesn't get lynched, it's very likely I will. As scum why would I try so hard to clear Clarity if it meant it would be more likely that I was going to be lynched?

Scum wants to blend in. I did several unnecessary, weird things this game that made me stick out.

It's bad to think marvel is scum? Get real and cut the wifom. If your read of Marv is anything other than null than it's you who is dumb.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:25 GMT

#1149

Actual last post.
Nope it's you. Closing window now.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:27 GMT

#1153

Why is he confirmed? I haven't seen any reasoning behind that so I have no reason to believe it. An emotionality that can easily be faked??

Why so happy pregame and not now? Maybe because I was trying to pretend to be a newb but I found it tiring.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:28 GMT

#1155

Marvel, sheep me and vote for Pandain.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 15:48 GMT

#1175

On October 30 2013 00:47 Koshi wrote:
WoS can be scum.
Sentinel can be scum.
SnB can be scum.

My top 3 atm.

You literally just made a case on Pandain..

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 16:36 GMT

#1217

Popping in to say I hate the WoS lynch. It feels like the only reason why are lynching him is because he isn't here.

I'm letting Pandain go.
Im letting Marv go (don't see what is so town about him though)

I would lynch Seuss, HotCottonCandy, or Sentinel.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 16:38 GMT

#1222

On October 30 2013 01:37 Promethelax wrote:
No one cares who you would lynch unless you are going to make a case and convince us.

You should care because those are the people who I would vote for.
If you are interesting in getting someone lynched, you should care.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 16:40 GMT

#1227

On October 30 2013 01:37 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why? You seemed kinda sure on him.

I was partially posturing on how hard I was pushing him. The meta read provided by Strongandbig and a complete lack of presence in the thread today are giving me doubt.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 16:50 GMT

#1240

Let's CFD Seuss or HotCottonCandy.
I'm voting for Seuss now because more people have expressed interest in lynching him.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 17:32 GMT

#1338

Seuss over WoS please.

All else being equal, you lynch the weaker player so that you can benefit from the insight of the better player.
In this case Seuss is the weaker player.

I read Seuss' analysis he posted in some quick chat about some random game. He is not thinking nearly as deep in this game as he was thinking in that analysis.

WoS voting for himself. You may not like it but it's honest. He is honest about not knowing who to lynch and that leans town.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 17:36 GMT

#1345

I can see town placing a placeholder vote on me yesterday. I was acting weird. Also I think it's less likely that scum would actually call it a placeholder vote.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 17:39 GMT

#1351

On October 30 2013 02:36 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why do you think Seuss would effectively counterclaim in that situation as mafia do you think?

This is actually a very good point. Changing my vote to WoS.

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 17:42 GMT

#1354

Wait, Marvel, doesn't Seuss have to claim there? Or else he has to never use his power and claim vanilla?

OOHCHILD

United States570 Posts

October 29 2013 18:15 GMT

#1389

Seuss looks pretty transparent and town with his recent explanations. Especially for second game scum. Going back to WoS I guess. I would rather lynch Sentinel or HotCottonCandy though.