EPT"##" Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
So far I dislike Oats and like Prome. On October 28 2013 12:39 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah I think marv is town for mainly that post and the fact that he didnt come out guns blazing. Baseless townread on marv is baseless. On October 28 2013 19:52 Oatsmaster wrote: marv, who other than seuss are you looking at as scum? On October 28 2013 20:15 Oatsmaster wrote: Marv what are you seeing about prome? Town or scum? Because that kinda affects whether I fix my thing now or NEVER. A bit too early to start sheeping someone. Maybe if he replied to marv's answers but he does not. Other than that Oats has pointed out a lot of things but not concluded anything about the things he points out. But mainly it's his reaction to WoS's post: + Show Spoiler + On October 28 2013 14:01 WaveofShadow wrote: Just popped in to say ##Paranoia I don't like your play this game either Prom. Your first post yelling at everybody not to be powering everybody up....I completely agree with. I just wouldn't have expected it to come from you. You take it a step further though---you say not only is powering other people up dumb, but you say it's policy lynchable. Have you pursued this course of action in your questioning of all of the people who have done so thus far? And THEN, not 4 posts later, you explain to everybody how to power you up. This reminds me of the very first ever game I played with you Prom, LX, in which you created some horseshit RNG talk early 'just to get discussion started' and you were promptly lynched for it---and flipped red. So Prome, your reads list at the start of the game. All I remember is you saying you'd lynch me based on my entry to the thread. I don't see you pursuing your policy lynches, your apparent scumreads or your 'discussion.' Funny part is' you never actually call me scum, you just say you'd lynch me based on me entering the thread and leaving, and even THEN you don't pursue it, and have not mentioned me even once since then. Your activity is pretty fantastic and all, and I get that you think Pandain tryharding is also pretty fantastic, but that don't mean shit imo. It's funny though, you say you'd rather base your read of Pandain off of what you get from him this game only and ignore his past meta, but you're ok to base your weak early read of me on meta even though you haven't played a game with me in ages? You are incredibly inconsistent just from your first few posts and I don't like it. I don't like it one bit sir. Care to discuss? ##Vote: Promethelax Oats replies (intentionally or not, it's a minute later): On October 28 2013 14:02 Oatsmaster wrote: super #mindblown by Prome's play today if hes town. Which is either reactive to WoS's case on Prome, or not, doesn't matter. Thing is, Oats just expressed a definite interest in Prome being possible scum. WoS made a case on the person that Oats just drew attention to, so what does oats have to say about that? On October 28 2013 14:02 Oatsmaster wrote: Lol WoS, prome explained what we needed to do to power him because I asked. Nothing apparently.... He just wanted to correct a detail in WoS's post. If Oats was genuinely concerned about prome being mafia, why does he not take this opportunity to talk about it? All he did was say "if town, then bad" which does nothing, pressures nothing. It's posting for the sake of posting. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 28 2013 22:48 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont get whats with this Clarity. Why are you so defensive? That's not me being defensive, that's me wanting to be heard. On October 28 2013 22:47 marvellosity wrote: Literally nothing you wrote is alignment indicative, it's *especially* not alignment indicative for Oats, and you should know that. Oats expressed that he thinks Prome might be mafia, and when WoS makes a case on Prome and Oats has NOTHING to say about it other than correcting a technicality Alright Oats you're around. Do you just have a bad feeling about Prome? Do you think he's scum? What do you think of WoS's case other than that mistake? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 28 2013 22:55 Koshi wrote: Clarityyou know what Oats meta is? Or at least what everybody says his meta is? Also, in case you missed it, ##Update Koshi if you are a cool kid. It's not even the 180 that's the issue, Koshi. He literally made a post saying prome was weird/odd/bad/scum whatever as WoS made a case on Prome but he had nothing to add. Like, how his his reply not "yeah I noticed that too" or "no I noticed this other thing" I've played with Oats before and this does not look like the same Oats. I did not miss it but don't really see why I would at this point. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 28 2013 22:57 WaveofShadow wrote: Your case to me seems based on basically nothing. Oats clearly posted his thing directly after my post not as a reply to it, and as far as correcting what he viewed as inconsistencies, that could theoretically be seen as towny since poking holes in a case on your scumread will either dismantle it or make it stronger---becoming something you can use. I don't personally believe it is alignment indicative but whatever. I didn't get a scumvibe from Oats for not specifically taking the points I used and running with them because he was working on his own stuff and looked like he was actually trying to figure out what was useful or not from my case. Again, I'm aware that he 180s later, that doesn't matter. What matters is at the point of that post he was clearly interested in Prome as possible scum. Correcting something is not alignment indicative, the fact that that was his only response is. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 28 2013 23:01 Promethelax wrote: marv, that is kind of a subtle read. Not super subtle but like not a read I'd expect a newer player to have. As soon as I typed this I realized WoS isn't actually all that new anymore, carry on. Clarity. Explain what oats is doing here that is out of character for him. Unless he started making sense and not doing stupid shit/changing his mind all the time this is totally in line with his meta AND that meta applies to both alignments so even if he wasn't doing that (which he is) it wouldn't be alignment indicative. I'd get you the venn diagram but I think you get my point. I've never seen an Oats scum game I'll be honest. Yes, Oats is all over the place, but when he's talking about one thing he doesn't ignore stuff relevant to what he's talking about e.g. WoS's case on you. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
But anyway, let's go with your thing. Does that make me scum to you? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Did his initial response to your case not strike you as odd? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 29 2013 01:51 marvellosity wrote: I was kinda fishing for something like this, good man :p I have this little theory in my head, that Clarity made a case on you because we had this conversation in Heavyweight about how only townies attack Oats, and mafia never do. Don't even remember this. I actually have to go somewhere urgently now so I'll produce some stuff tomorrow >.< There's a reason my oats stuff didn't come with a vote, when it usually does. I did believe in it though, still kinda do, but will reread and see if I change my mind later. But your vote is kinda bad marv, TT | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
marv can you explain your townread on oats while I'm gone to help me understand? Thanks. Gotta run | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Like, I tried forcing it and I just kinda zoned out after two pages. I'm willing to accept that my points on oats are probably wrong just by the amount of people saying they are. I really don't wanna get lynched, let alone day 1, but I really can't bring myself to do stuff about it at this moment. Please don't lynch me? >.< | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 29 2013 22:53 marvellosity wrote: Step it up if you're town. Welp. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 29 2013 22:58 Promethelax wrote: Seriously Clarity. You could at least post pictures of baby seals. Baby seals are cute. I wouldn't fuck over my team like this as scum, but you'll just have to take my word for that I guess. Like, maybe I'll end up catching up before deadline, but with the way I'm currently feeling probably not. I figured the best approach would just be posting sincerely. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 29 2013 23:00 OOHCHILD wrote: Marvel, you yourself admitted that Oatsmaster is playing more town this game. What if Clarity reads the behavior you read as more town, conversely, as more SCUM. This guy is weird, though. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 29 2013 23:01 Promethelax wrote: Than Clarity would have written a very different case than the one he wrote. Clarity: you did it in lix. Yes I know, different circumstances and would never do that again. On October 29 2013 23:01 marvellosity wrote: The good reason to be replaced, if you're being honest, is that you're ill and can't really read the thread. As it is you're basically refusing to play the game because you can't for whatever reason. Yeah that's not it or I would. marv why are you driving this lynch so hard, do you really believe in it that much? | ||
| ||
