EPTOn October 30 2013 00:47 Koshi wrote:
WoS can be scum.
Sentinel can be scum.
SnB can be scum.
My top 3 atm.
WoS can be scum.
Sentinel can be scum.
SnB can be scum.
My top 3 atm.
Somehow Pandain has disappeared?
...
"##" Mafia - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Somehow Pandain has disappeared? ... | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:50 Seuss wrote: My one big qualm with rayn's argument is that he overthinks Wave's OOHCHILD vote. There were several of us on that train, and the primary reason behind it was policy/pressure. I don't think any of us expected to keep our votes there, up until OOHCHILD actually started posting up a storm. Yeah, but everyone else has done something since. You're actually supporting the argument here :/ | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:31 Seuss wrote: I'd like to lynch Wave, but I was holding on to my vote because I didn't want to hop on the train when he hasn't had the chance to defend himself. The case against him is pretty strong. Given that we collectively believe Clarity and OOHCHILD to be bad-town, my next choice would be [UoN]Sentinel. The shenanigans with his power don't sit well with me, and Pandain looks more like he's playing poorly than playing scum. Didn't stop you from "pressuring" OOHCHILD did it? Why the difference? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
OOHCHILD (dude you said you didn't think was scum) Clarity (guy having a bitchfit) --- Not... stellar. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:36 OOHCHILD wrote: Popping in to say I hate the WoS lynch. It feels like the only reason why are lynching him is because he isn't here. I'm letting Pandain go. Im letting Marv go (don't see what is so town about him though) I would lynch Seuss, HotCottonCandy, or Sentinel. Why? You seemed kinda sure on him. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:37 WaveofShadow wrote: My earlier power use on Seuss was fake. Originally I had him as my strongest townread based on what I know of him from my interaction with him in my newbie game, and he was the only one I felt confident enough of throwing his vote in a good spot to make my power at least semi-useful, but I did want to gauge town reaction to power use first. Could you please explain your Seuss read? Could you also please explain how you went from not giving me a townread to giving me two votes when I'm apparently lynching a townie (you)? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:47 WaveofShadow wrote: I do think you are capable of using it as mafia, but I think as mafia, knowing I am in the game you'd probably specifically label it as such or make reference to me somehow. You used it rather offhandedly which makes me feel that it was genuine. As far as Seuss, I REALLY don't like his play now. When i originally faked my role use on him i figured he'd come back with strong analysis and play like he did in his newbie and would prove himself a good choice for my power, but he has done basically the opposite: sheeping town sentiment, no reads, and no strong posts one way or another. It may be possible that Seuss is scum atm but I do not feel comfortable pushing anything with the limited time that I have, and would have to read closer which i frankly do not have time for especially if I need to be defending myself. I literally do not want you to answer rayn or Prome's case, I want you to push who you think is the best lynch. That's the most important thing. You can defend cases if you have time AFTER you've pushed whatever you think the right lynch is. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Er, except you asked him repeatedly to answer your case. So... yeah. Stop talking Prome and let him find some mafia, should he wish to. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:53 Seuss wrote: This is something I've been struggling with this game. I'm having the opposite problem, I'm finding more people suspicious than usual. Curious that you're struggling to make any better vote than a policy vote. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 01:56 Promethelax wrote: So marv, if WoS is scum is Suess scum? I don't see it, WoS has done some bullshit buddying that has been awful. But is it S-S awful or S-T awful or T-whatever awful? I have a hard time seeing a player hard buddy their scumbuddy as the player who knows that scumbuddy best because at this point if Suess flips red WoS is a policy lynch 100% no question. So since you have had some serious issues with Suess (ones his most recent post exacerbated) so can WoS also be scum? I don't see it. I don't really know or care that much atm, I just want to find one target I'm happy with. The worst thing WoS posted all game was in rayn's case, where he called Clarity scummy but not a worthwhile target. That was not so good. I'm also not sure why he doesn't think mafia could have a double-vote creator. In Red Team's Prize, mafia had a role that made a mafia double lynch into a townie double lynch. That was some OP shit lol. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 02:03 Pandain wrote: There is no way I am catching up to this in time allotted(I have to study for test). Recap please? Could you tell me exactly what your vote-cancelling role is please? How does it work, precisely? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 02:04 Seuss wrote: To elaborate, you guys move a lot faster than I've been prepared for and I've been struggling to keep up. Combined with a fair amount of scrutiny I've spent more than defending myself and reading then hunting scum. So let me do something important here. ##Encourage marvellosity Astute eyes probably picked up on the fact that I had a power from one of my most scrutinized posts. At one point I incorrectly assumed that everyone had powers. It's a basic logical step. I'm counter-claiming WaveofShadow here somewhat. My power adds +1 to a player's vote. Given that Pandain can allegedly nullify someone's vote entirely it's not complete madness to think there are multiple voting powers around, but WaveofShadow's is too close to mine for me to be comfortable with it. Will it show up immediately in a votecount if I vote? If you don't know, could you clarify asap please? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 30 2013 02:07 Pandain wrote: Once a day I can make a player have one less vote, which is permanent. I can use it daily. Does this basically mean that by Day 4 you can have removed 4 players votes entirely? | ||
| ||
