Hogwarts Mafia - Page 4

On October 19 2013 02:14 Mattchew wrote:
this ceph lynch seems to be happening pretty easily

On October 19 2013 02:16 Sn0_Man wrote:
I still don't particularly "like" the Cephiro lynch. But I'm OK with it. Its uncommon for me to "like" day 1 lynches because as I've already stated nobody's flipped yet.

Can you quote some "scummy" stuff for me then? You think its scummy that I lurked. *shrug*. There's lots of other lurkers. You think its scummy that I'm voting Cephiro. *shrug* theres lots of others voting Cephiro many with no more reason than I. You think its scummy that my defense boils down to "I'm not scummier than anybody else". *shrug* its true I'm not scummier than anybody else. Its hard to defend against accusations that don't imply scum. The best I can do is point out that half the thread is guilty of anything you can come up with against me and that I'm not scum. I can't find scum today and somehow thats not OK for me but its fine for your prime scumread yamato and at least 5 other people. Getting RNG tunnelled is off-putting.

Just quit tunnelling its really obnoxious.

On October 19 2013 05:14 LastArgument wrote:


This post is remarkably scummy when you've been absent for the hours leading up to the lynch.

Then you come back and berate the town, having done nothing to help it?

Bad, bad, bad.

On October 19 2013 05:17 LastArgument wrote:


No, because you did nothing to help the town arrive at a good lynch when you had the opportunity to.

On October 19 2013 05:20 Sn0_Man wrote:

Too bad that isnt' helping town arrive at a good lynch.

On October 19 2013 04:04 Sn0_Man wrote:

Because I've played with lazy half-troll Palmar Day 1 before and he was town. He's the kind of player who dies N1 as town anyway so if he lives and doesn't shape up then its like a free red-check. Why lynch now when we are getting a virtual cop-check for tomorrow? Nothing tells me Palmar has to be scum. I can definitely see it but for now I don't see a reason to lynch D1.

On October 19 2013 05:40 Sn0_Man wrote:


Well you don't read the thread

Actually I can't blame you it was the last post on a page and the thread is zooming but thar it is. I wanted a stutters lynch but we had like 15 mins to make it happen and nobody joined me. Haven't figured out why, but nobody joined me.

On October 19 2013 05:55 Sn0_Man wrote:
Well, he's discussing the miller claim a bit too. Not really much scumhunting tho but our QT is kinda boring that way. Me and Skanjab even get along in the QT somehow. Probably because he has a diff name there or something.

On October 19 2013 06:03 Sn0_Man wrote:
Something something Skanjab livin the double life obv scum lynch pls

On October 19 2013 06:35 Sn0_Man wrote:
To paraphrase toad, he states that he could be killed if one of us (his housemates) claims a character name in thread and he wouldn't be happy about that.

He later expounds that he has a voting restriction, that he considers his role anti town, and that he may die if he votes incorrectly based on afaik flavour role. And that me being female allows him to vote for me.

Beyond that Skanjab once posted "all females are scum" BEFORE claiming female, an interesting comment in hindsight.

On October 19 2013 07:27 supersoft wrote:


No he seems not. Stutters is no vigshot.

On October 20 2013 05:22 Onegu wrote:



He said stutters in qt

On October 20 2013 05:51 syllogism wrote:
if someone is responsible for the deaths of pandain or ET, claiming that might be fine.