EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XLIX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
| ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
| ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
Well, I read through my last post, And then decide how bad that thought is. Judging by what you just said July, a 100% GUESS at a "afk lynch" is better than a 40% chance to land a scrum roll on the first day within the first 4 hours. My only question is; Are you being serious right now? Because trying to throw off town that hard would seem pretty scummy to me. I'll hold my vote for 2 hours for you to respond. After that I will have to start thinking about going to sleep since I have to work real early. I'm already staying up late for this.[/QUOTE] How is July's thought a bad idea, it is unsafe, while you have a 40% chance to land a scum you have a 60% chance to blame an innocent townie like myself. Police detectives just don't take a group of people then choose one of them at random and arrest them. Don't even understand how you think he is throwing off the town when you are a danger wanting to pick random people to lynch, that is what seems scummy to me. | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
On October 14 2013 16:25 OdinOfPergo wrote: Also Vonthin, How does that work into what I said at all? July didn't even post a counter argument. He just disagreed with what I suggested. He was just saying he disagreed with your methods, he didn't say anywhere(unless I missed something which i don't think i did) that we waste our votes lynching inactive members which you said he did in one of your earlier posts. Both lynching RNG/getting the inactive person is both sorta stupid | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
On October 14 2013 16:38 playerboy345 wrote: Could you maybe quote what post you are reffering to? Or atleast a link to it, would be much easier to keep track of things that way. This was Julys first post when he responded to the RNG thing On October 14 2013 15:29 July617 wrote: You're going to randomly tag someone who could be potential town and marking them as scum? Doesn't sound like a safe way to play to me . The bottom of this post is when OdinOfPergo said that July told us to waste our votes On October 14 2013 16:20 OdinOfPergo wrote: Yes. The difference between his and my idea, Is mainly, I have a strong chance to land scum. He has a penny in a hay bail. More over, my idea leaves me the entire rest of D1 to ALTER my vote. While he is claiming, regardless of what happens in the next FORTY hours, that we should waste our votes on "in-active" members that may or may not be mod-killed and replaced anyway. | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
On October 14 2013 16:30 July617 wrote: I don't agree with this at all. How exactly is lynching a afk/lurker at this point better than taking stronger odds chance of a RNG I posted earlier better? I just don't get it. I never said we lynch anyone . let's just let people talk for a bit. [/QUOTE] Do not edit your posts | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
On October 14 2013 17:40 OdinOfPergo wrote: My pre-arguement on why we should do this instead of "Silence" or "afk" lynch. July's response to me. This is stupid, because you are trading chance to lynch (All-be-it 4 to 6), For a 100% guess. Vonthin supports this view point. Which makes me wonder about him too. Why would people freak about about of 4-6 chance when they are willing to jump on a 1-10? Nothing adds up right now. So now you join in. You jump in supporting my suggestion. That is a ballsy move, what makes you think it's a good idea to go ballsdeep on him because of his ONE post? Again we agree. On October 14 2013 15:29 July617 wrote: You're going to randomly tag someone who could be potential town and marking them as scum? Doesn't sound like a safe way to play to me . Makes a good point, but would it really be all that smart for scum to play risky? I don't necessarily agree with his post but I don't see it as scummy. [/QUOTE] This is where you lose me. They are trying to call me out for my RNG. But what better plan are they suggesting? Because alls I've heard to this point is "lynch afk". Which, most likely, means we waste our votes on someone who is going to get mod-killed/replaced the following morning. Describe in detail if I have not followed peoples logic soundly.[/QUOTE] July stated that all he was was disagreeing with your RANDOM choice of lynching someone, wasn't implying on any other lynching method and literally nothing about choosing inactive person and guessing, you are just making up shit to make him look bad. Once again I was saying I am disagreeing with your RNG and no where stating I am making a 1-10 guess on someone.You are jumping 2 conclusions once again and trying to make people look worse. Just cause no one stated a plan besides lynching an inactive or your RNG plan doesn't mean we all agree with the lynching inactives. I am not comfortable with lynching anyone yet as it is still pretty early in day 1 and not everyone has posted yet as also stated by July in an earlier post, my plan is to wait as long as possible to vote after reading everyone's posts to see who is the most suspicious. | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
##vote: istandwithmitt Agree with the other people who voted for him(Suess/Odin), posts are really negative and bring bad attention to him, he might just be a townie with poor communication skills but still has the highest chances for being a scum from what I've read | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
On October 15 2013 22:29 Bereft wrote: seriously? has the "highest chances for being a scum" based on what analysis exactly? did you even read my or Seuss' post? ##Vote: Vonthin I did read your post and Suess' posts Here is reasons why I voted for him 1. He is super quick to jump the gun to lynch someone, votes after seeing SagaZ's very first post saying we should lynch inactive 2. His very next post he switches and votes for playerboy by saying he posts nothing worthwhile(he has some point here, a good portion of his posts don't say much besides i agree with x but a lot of those posts came after he voted against him) 3. Makes shit posts saying things like "Good poast" after someone votes against him, then just proceeds to argue poorly trying to justify his voting and being 2 confrontational plus no real analysis. He seems the scummiest to me, there are some people that seem scummy but nothing as glaring as him. I am still contemplating switching my vote to Nyx but want to see another post or two from him. Reasons for thinking he is scum so far: Hasn't said almost anything besides that he is gonna blindly follow Odin when he isn't a confirmed town and that odin has a plan because we don't have one the townies auto lose! Then he just posts once more saying he is voting for Mitt and nothing else | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
#vote nyxnyxnyx Literally hasn't said anything besides he is following Odin, nothing about who is scummy. I don't see why a townie would just say they will just do what another person is doing especially if they don't know if they are mafia or not. | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
##unvote ##vote nyxnyxnyx | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
On October 16 2013 03:54 Balla24 wrote: Ok. I have a scum read on nyx, agree with E00e on this one.. Unfortunately it's not much since he hasn't done or said much, it's a gut feeling. He starts the game by blindly following Odin (who was just posting to start conversation, imo) and then suddenly switches his vote to Vonthin for either of the following reasons: (1) people called him out on randomly following Odin so he decides to follow other people or (2) Vonthin voted him. He hasn't given any other reasoning for his play besides the fact that it's good to have town leaders to follow and a plan. I'm not liking him. However, I am hesitant to cast a vote because Vonthin casted a vote on him and he is also under suspicion from other players. I'm on the fence with my read for Vonthin because he has some substance to his posts and posted his plan beforehand, the switch to nyx makes sense. I'd like to know why he's willing to let up on istandwithmitt, is it because you agree on what others have said about him or what? Did you read his past couple of posts? Looks like Mittgave up and will most likely be mod killed, even if he isn't gonna be mod killed there isn't a point in killing him today since we pretty much know everything about him and nyx started to look really scummy to me so I switched to him like I said I would if I saw someone who looked scummier than mitt, nyx looks incapable of forming an opinion for himself and just follows everyone else which doesn't really seem like a thing a townie would do. | ||
|
Vonthin
United States2864 Posts
Anyways I have to go to work now and won't be back till late tonight unless I have time to check on my phone, hopefully I'm not hanged but it looks like I am just for disagreeing with a stupid rng plan and then hoping on an obvious bandwagon that people were starting to get off :/ | ||
| ||
