World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 33
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Then again, I couldn't believe slOosh would flip town after giving up. I was sure he was just playing out because it was lame to concede :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Yes, I do actually. For example, here's s0lstice being suspicious of me for a conciliatory tone: On May 18 2013 13:27 s0Lstice wrote: It'd be sputnik, and I'd feel ok about it. What you were saying about Marv and his descent from rage was compelling though. Something caught my eye while reading the whole Marv/Dandel exchange the apology....as Marv has done this before, I wondered if he ever has apologized for it. If he has done this before but never really showed any sign of guilt, then that is something. I've been digging through personality to see. Need to look at his scum games as well, its a fat wad of meta to get through. Still though, food for thought. He argues with sloosh about me here: link but only after sloosh brings it up. This is a blatant lie. Reference: the end of page 1/start of page 2 of my filter where I make several posts attacking Dirkzor. Changing his opinion based on clarity's sentiment. First its "Sloosh looks good up until conclusion clarity" then suddenly his firsts post are weak because clarity said so. Then sloosh looks bad. Why is listening to other people scummy again? Vote on oats: Link After that a few back and forth questions that doesn't prove either way: link but he still ends up unvoting. So I put pressure on someone and I'm happy with the answers. Why is that scummy? You'd prefer I tunnelled Oats the townie, would you? Also note the small things that Marv find weird/scummy but no reaction with vote like with me or oats. I'm supposed to vote every time I find something weird? Are you on drugs? Marv then votes sloosh. He doesn't push this lynch at all. We had a majority on slOosh. The entire reason I got mad at BH was because he was defending slOosh. Your argument is awful. Short after: link he posts his thought about everyone. Isn't this a perfect time to re-insert that he wants sloosh to be lynched? He doesn't even mention him. Firstly I do mention him, secondly why do I need to state my ground on someone I'm voting? I obviously think they're mafia. He puts light pressure on people and backs off. He ask a lot of question and point of stuff, but he never follow through. Thanks for describing many of my towngames, you're a babe. Second half of the sentence is just a lie. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
before that my day 1 filter actually looked pretty pro-town, as he said on more than one occasion. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 04 2013 20:24 Palmar wrote: I am here to prove Marvellosity is scum Three things make marvellosity scum:
For reference, here is is filter. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=373946&user=140487¤tpage=All Marv isn't a normal player, he's not going to scumslip and get owned by some woopsie, but he can nevertheless be figured out as scum quite easily. You just have to look beyond the basics. Let's start with the first one. I know I'm not one to speak this game but Marv has almost no post of any significance in the game. Literally his entire filter for the first few pages is a bunch of one-liners with little or no opinions in them. He explains my motives at length in one post here linky!. But that's about the only content he posted early in the game. I want to take you guys back to a previous game of his as town to give you the comparison. Compare this to his opening in Rock Band mafia where he was town Clicky! Right off the Bat marv is giving detailed reasonings of his thought process and trying to get people to listen to him. That's not the case this game. ---- The second point is that Marvellosity isn't doing anything to paint people scum. I am literally going to list up every indication of wanting to lynch someone or attempting to scumhunt Marvellosity has made. I'm leaving out random loaded questions towards people though. Policy lynch (that's the only time he ever mentions kush). Sheeping on Adam's case on clarity, without any later attempts at pushing anything in that direction, except of course this post here. That's it. Aside from him trying to claim he has some "extra knowledge" about how I play, which I kinda thought was true but clearly isn't the case if he's apathetic/dumb enough to actually want to lynch me today, that's all he's done so far this game. A huge reason I think marvellosity is scum is that he's not scumhunting. He hasn't posted any reasons for any of his reads, his sole aggression is against me for "trolling". To be perfectly honest it's so easy to attack me that marv hardly bothers, he simply writes a bunch of shit about how I'm capable of doing all these things as either alignment, and then says "I've had enough of you" and votes me. That's his entire case, and he sees no reason to push any other case or even discuss anyone else at length. I want you all to go and read marv's filter and look at how much he has talked about other people than myself. It's almost not there. Which leads me to point number 3 ---- Marv seems to not care at all who gets lynched. He kinda wants to lynch me it seems based on my actions early game, but he's not really pushing it. He's not actively trying to get people to lynch me, he doesn't even seem to particularly care if people agree with him, which is a big red flag for me. If he genuinely thinks I'm scum, shouldn't he be pushing this read of his? When asked he hardly even answers: This enough simply being the explanation post of his that I already linked previously in this case, and then this thing here: And what follows is basically him saying I can do a lot of things as either alignment. Marv knows that if I want to I won't get lynched today, and assuming he's scum he also knows that I am town and will not allow myself to be lynched like that. So it's a safe push and a good long-term tunnel. Once again. Marv is not actively trying to lynch me, he's perfectly fine with sitting back and not doing anything. Apathetic Marv is scum Marv. ##Vote Marvellosity | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On no time ever did anyone write: Any case on scum-marv's day 1 because it always looks too good, too clean. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 09 2013 20:39 Clarity_nl wrote: Yeah this is silly. As marv pointed out we had a majority so we were basically waiting for: a) Sloosh to get lynched; or b) Something to happen No need to push someone who has a majority unless sentiment is moving away from the lynchtarget, which it wasn't. Like, it's another example of you just reading the first 8 pages of marv's filter and calling things scummy, when in context they are not. Townies do this too, however.... That said, marv's follow up on dirk vote day 1 was fine. He voted you because your opening post was scummy. Then when asked to explain your vote you were having issues so his vote was still on you, then when you were being consistently terrible in your defense you seemed genuine and he unvoted (and explained). At no point did I wonder "why is marv's vote on dirk", and neither should you have. On October 02 2013 22:57 Dirkzor wrote: I like your push. Your questions and pokes have some reason behind them. It also helps me explain myself better. I felt maybe clarity made the obligated questioning of your vote and reason and then just jumped the "wagon"... But I'm really sure what to do with that. And I would argue that making a vote with your first post will always draw attention. Especially when there is so little to work with... | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
1) your case on me merely describes my townplay, or is twisting things to be not how they were. 2) i'm simply not capable of posting this much as mafia. you don't have to believe me, you just have to check my games. My biggest ever mafia-filter in 20 pages over 5 cycles. I'm well over 30 now. I can't do it. My last mafia game, Desert, I gave up at the end of the 2nd cycle because I couldn't be fucked anymore. 3) I only ever lose my shit as town. This is verifiable. 4) Clarity and I have been speaking for each other all game, one before the other. We're thinking the same. We're probably the same alignment 5) I give way too much of a shit to be mafia Your case is both terrible and horribly biased, and to repeat, merely describes my townplay. Look at Palmar's case against me there. "Sheeping on Adam's case on clarity," " He hasn't posted any reasons for any of his reads," "That's his entire case, and he sees no reason to push any other case or even discuss anyone else at length." "but he's not really pushing it. He's not actively trying to get people to lynch me" Sheeping other people's opinions? No in depth reasons? Not pushing very hard? This is in fact Palmar describing town marvellosity in this game. I can bring up similar cases by DarthPunk on town-marv. What I cannot do is bring up similar cases on scum-marv, because they don't exist. If you are town, you seriously need to reconsider what you're doing, right now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
If you're mafia, feel free to continue the tunnel, however. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I don't *have* to have this fucking conversation with Dirk, I'm fucking having it because I'm desperate to get the right lynch. | ||
| ||