On October 09 2013 04:35 VayneAuthority wrote:
looks like a scumclaim to me, vivax posted GIFs when I trapped his shitty logic in roulette too. gG confession

Oh man! GIFs are scumclaims. We must BOTH be scum then.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 19:38 GMT

#5384

On October 09 2013 04:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
difference being that I consistently post GIFs, you and vivax only post them why you're roasted

Can you name a single game where this is true about me?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 19:40 GMT

#5386

So no. Keep on keeping on, VA.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 19:43 GMT

#5388

On October 09 2013 04:40 VayneAuthority wrote:

Show nested quote +

you ask me to provide a sample from a list of 1 completed game, where you are town and 1 ongoing game where you are scum. you are pretty much a downie

It's not like I've got a bunch of games. On this site. That you can find and read.

Surely, some of those games have this magical gif tell.

Surely, these games show me not being paranoid about claims.

Because, boy howdy, finding me not being paranoid and my magical gif tell would really, really help you out here.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 19:55 GMT

#5395

On October 09 2013 04:53 VisceraEyes wrote:
Emotion has nothing to do with it. You're poison, and I'm done being infected by you.

Technically a poison wouldn't infect you. But yeah, I agree.

Any last second pandain thoughts?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 19:55 GMT

#5397

Slash do you agree on cc?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:01 GMT

#5409

gg koshi

So, CR and probably CC over VA honestly, as butt as that feels in my heart.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:03 GMT

#5410

##vote: Chairman Ray

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:05 GMT

#5418

On October 09 2013 05:04 VisceraEyes wrote:
Seems obvious Koshi bussed me with Pandain...but whatever.

His post says he had no bus and he shot pandain.

Flavor odd, but...why lie when you post on the deadline.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:22 GMT

#5441

On October 09 2013 05:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't see scumteam of Vayne/CR/Solstice out 2/3 of their members in 2 phases.

The problem with this statement is that they did, indeed, out two members.

Both were under pressure, but DID out themselves, and WERE on the same team. Has no bearing on the third member really, though.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:25 GMT

#5443

rayn.

Does a team of CR/austinmcc/ANYONE make sense to you?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:26 GMT

#5444

I'm gonna even hold off on the argument that I, for whatever reason, think it's a good idea to claim scum as scum. Or the implication that I tell my scumbuddies to claim scum as scum.

You don't like those lineups.

But you do love the team with CR and I both on it?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:28 GMT

#5449

On October 09 2013 05:27 WaveofShadow wrote:

Show nested quote +

What does the third player in that team have anything to do with who decided it was a good idea out 2 scum members in 2 days?
Do you envision the third player in that team being the leader?

Wait austin why did you include yourself in that scumteam list? lol
Shouldn't that be solstice?

YES THAT SHOULD BE ME/CR

I AM GOOD WITH NAMES THIS GAME

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:31 GMT

#5458

No wos. That should be me. The third person would be filled in, but the thought process is that rayn is eliminating certain combos, but not eliminating the one where I'm on a team with CR.

You messed with the quote.

WoS, I have no idea why the third person has anything to do with 2 others outing themselves. But rayn is implying that it does. I'm responding to that.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:33 GMT

#5461

On October 09 2013 05:30 WaveofShadow wrote:

Show nested quote +

So I don't understand.
Are we somehow supposed to believe you wouldn't bus CR, the inactive superlurk?
I knwo you made all these arguments about your push and how long you were doing it and whatnot, but it's not out of the question imo.

It's not out of the question, no. But it's SOMETHING to think about, and I can point to a boatload of posts here.

In my mind, at least when confronted with "I don't see CC/CR/solstice" without any explanation why, with rayn ending up implying I'm the remaining mafia, then rayn should be giving some explanation why I fit better than CC or VA or a host or anything.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:39 GMT

#5465

On October 09 2013 05:33 VayneAuthority wrote:

Show nested quote +

and austin do you agree with this or not? very important really. Binding contract.

No, I don't. Because it's ridiculous. Here's why:

My argument is that me pounding away on CR means I'm not associated with him. You're saying that because CR attacked you, you're not associated with him.

I would argue that I've been CLEARLY on scum CR for a while, and trying to get others around to that. CR, whoever and whatever he suspected, has not been pushing anything, has not actually been pushing to get you lynched. So the two are different.

Also, IF you're town, here's your thought process:

(1) austinmcc attacked CR
(2) CR attacked me
(3) I'm town
(4) austinmcc says he probably not scum with CR because he attacked him
(5) therefore, austinmcc should believe that I'm not scum with CR
(6) if he does not, he's mafia

But....if that's your actual thought process, then you should ALSO have this one:

(1) austinmcc attacked CR
(2) CR attacked me
(3) I'm town
(4) I'm not associated with CR, in part, because he attacked me
(5) therefore, I should believe that austinmcc isn't scum with CR

Like...you either believe in association or you don't. If you BELIEVE that you should NOT be associated with CR, then you also believe I shouldn't be. So whether or not I think you should be associated with CR, you wouldn't be making threats like this. Essentially, you're trying to say you'd lynch me for being inconsistent, when doing so would also be inconsistent on your part.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:42 GMT

#5470

On October 09 2013 05:39 VayneAuthority wrote:
In the end it just all points back to austin. nobody mentioned s0lstice and CR more then austin this entire game, not even close... if he flips town then I need to do a long re-read of the game but until then its austin

Yup. I mentioned them. As scumreads or suspicions. Look how they flipped.

CR's D2 post makes you less likely to be with him. Doesn't make it impossible. Just pandain flipping scum adds a chance for you to be town. But if you think it 100% clears you, then you'd be arguing that as we cleared. So right now, we're both in the same spot...doesn't 100% clear the other person, but adds some questions and reduces likelihood.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 20:45 GMT

#5471

On October 09 2013 05:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Suddenly Austin's D4 "let's not lynch into the cops and kill this last MCB who is btw 100% CR" looks even much more terribad than it did before..

I initially thought this was true, but...is it?

If I'm supposed to be their third teammate, is there a difference to me between killing solstice or CR? Like, you're arguing I'm mafia because I suggested we kill one DRB over another. Is there a reason for me to do that as DRB? In either case, town lynches mafia, and town lynches my teammate.

And if they lynch CR, my teammate, and solstice has claimed cop, he's outed and 100% dead.

So what you're arguing is that I'd try to get town to lynch my other scumbuddy, when solstice was going to die due to claim, and that.....this would be a good thing for scumaustin?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 21:01 GMT

#5474

VA, the biggest thing in your favor based on the flips isn't you and CR being on a team, it's the people that got got.

I honestly expected to see shots at 2-3 of Koshi/VE/WoS. That leaves scum and people trying to push a mislynch on me, whether you're town or scum.

The fact that those WEREN'T the kills means that I'm not being set up as much as I think, and increases the chances of CC over you, because the kill went on OATS. Oats getting killed ensures maximum pissing match between you/people who think you're town and me/people who think i'm town/might be town.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

October 08 2013 21:04 GMT

#5476

Or at least, I read more into that than you/CR. ymmv, but i DO see oats's death as an attempt to clog the thread with each of us trying to poop on the other. He wasn't doing anything, could have been the shot just because he was guaranteed not to be protected, but taking out the least involved confirmed guy indicates that scum weren't super super threatened by everyone else's spamming.