EPTOn September 15 2013 05:20 Koshi wrote:
Ohyeah. You are right.
Tell me. Which 3 targets are most likely to be docced this night?
Ohyeah. You are right.
Tell me. Which 3 targets are most likely to be docced this night?
Why?
Golden Sun: The Broken Seal Mini Mafia - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
Why? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 05:27 Koshi wrote: I am just interested. No answer? I would say me or Debears. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 05:59 Pandain wrote: The talking about whether OP is SK or Survivor is useless and doesn't affect us. There's no way to definitely tell the difference as they're both third party and have the same motives (survive at all costs), as well as help get rid of people who threaten them. I don't think there's much use in the speculation, I agree with vayne's analysis of leave him as a back-up lynch in case we're uncertain on who to lynch. As for me Furthermore anyone who thinks I'm scum ignores the fact that I have been suspicious of Zealos before and even posted this here. Also quote of mine: I was like the first one(I think, or at least significant one) to actually analyze Zealos and point out suspicious behaviors besides just generic "being useless." I had switched to Zealos(why even encourage that bandwagon in the first place if I never wanted him to be lynched, it easily could have gone out of my control if I was scum.) In fact, I hadn't realized OP had voted, and thought that he was going to be lynched instead of zealous. I would rather have had blubbers lynched instead of OP which is why I changed my vote. I don't know how I would have voted between blubbers and zealous. Furthermore you assume Zealos is scum which isn't certain. Even if he is, it wouldn't mean I would be scum. As I mentioned before, I had thought it was between OP and Blubbers and made sure my vote counted and chose blubbers. I know you were suspicious of Zealos that's the crux of my argument. you indicated time and time again that Zealos was suspicious. You believed blub could be mafia but was not as good of a lynch as Zealos and that you wanted to leave him alive because you can read him more easily later. You did vote between Zealos and Blubbers, you unvoted Zealos and voted for Blubbers. You posted your reasoning at the time for not wanting to lynch Zealos once people started actually pushing on him and it was shady. It looks to me a lot like you were soft bussing Zealos and then when people actually started moving on to him you got cold feet and panicked. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 06:28 Pandain wrote: When did I say Zealos was a better lynch than Blub? You say it several times in your filter, including in the quote you posted in your defense saying I was wrong because you were suspicious of Zealos. I get your point about not knowing BH's vote count. without that vote Zealos wouldn't have been lynched. But I have no way of knowing though if you switched your vote because you didn't see BH's post and OP was going to be lynched if you didn't or if you switched your vote because you actually did see BH's last second vote and realized that Zealos was the person getting lynched and moved to Blubbers. The reasons you were using to discourage people from voting Zealos at the end of the day were suspicious. He might be blue?? Who backs off on a scumread because they might be blue? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 06:47 Old Partner wrote: PS since there is a non-zero chance you got shot could you indicate which NKs tonight would indicate town shouldn't lynch me kkthxbai Do you still want somebody to indicate which night kills should make town lynch you? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:04 Pandain wrote: That's a survivor role right? Probably means OP is scum, then. He is probably SK like S&B Pointed out, but with no town deaths we can afford to get rid of him. He is confirmed anti-town. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:43 Koshi wrote: 1% 2 survivors could be but then there is no SK And I tell you this: WoS was not killed by scummers. Unless some sick bluehunting was going on. What player do you think would kill WoS? I would think it's somebody who he's confident at reading and I don't know who that is in this game. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 08:10 Old Partner wrote: :| if I was the SK I'd have claimied vigi. I guess I'd have shot WoS BUT THATS NOT THE POINT lol BH, I love you but you're getting lynched. you would lynch yourself too at this point it's the most pro-town move. you've got an extremely high chance of being mafia/SK and if by some miracle you end up survivor it's not even a big deal. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 10:18 strongandbig wrote: I got roleblocked. And am at dinner with my girlfriend so will not be posting any more tonight. I think I know how to catch this rolebocker, what is the name of your GF's TL account? IS IT THE KUSHM4STA??? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
I'm still liking Zealos for a day3 lynch. I think he is independently scummy and that his flip could tell us a lot about Pandain. He didn't really react at all to being accused, which is something I think town players would do. Someone who is good at reading oats needs to help me out, because I disagree with pretty much every single post he makes.I would think that if oats was scum he would feel pressured to agree with at least some of town's opinions, but I really do not know. I agree with the consensus that first night role blocks are often town. That's a big point towards S&B being town | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 13:32 Pandain wrote: Also Oats what happened to this? Why have you changed despite him becoming more suspicious? Oats changed his stance after BH claimed 3rd party. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9857 Posts
On September 15 2013 08:04 Koshi wrote: Nope. You would feel stupid if you don't lynch BH and he ends up being scum. Then you can feel stupid. @koshi why switch off BH now. Kush and oats i could see switching but this surprises me. BH is absolutely the correct lynch for he day. Why risk hitting town when we can hit a confirmed anti-town player? BH's breadcrumb wasn't good and the chances of 2 survivors is very low. Also Oats, I don't agree with your characterization of BH's scum play. From what I remember BH as scum is unable to keep up the activity he has as town and has a hard time faking the aggression as well. | ||
| ||
