On September 20 2013 03:54 Pandain wrote:
Rayne if you were in university you would understand why I can't really elaborate more.

I've said before Vayne was iffy at best, I've always said Kush was the best bet. Read my filter for plenty of analysis. Vayne is also playing like his town play in Titanic.

Yet you have time to make these vote switches and say "i'll tell why kush is scum", and when you come back you do something completely different like explaining why you couldn't post... Doesn't look good.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 19:02 GMT

#3294

At least everyone not voting is town. Time to start making cases scum.
I am waiting.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 19:05 GMT

#3297

Pandain, if you post, post the case against kush as you promised. If you post anything other than that when you post next time i am going to vote for you.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 19:14 GMT

#3307

On September 18 2013 13:33 Papa_Smurf wrote:
@Panda, Grack, Raynp, (sorry oats you think zealos is town so this doesn't apply to you)

In reference to the above post of mine on zealos, in the case that you agree with my zealos read

Do we want to

1) Lynch a scum with disruptive thread presence (Kush)

or 2) Lynch a sk/possible scum with no thread presence in a possible attempt to reduce kp if he is sk (zealos)

What happened to this debears?
Also why is Sno most suspicious from D1 votes when you earlier said he was the least suspicious?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 19:14 GMT

#3309

Apparently Pandain's case on kush is "he asked GM's about if scum got fakeclaims" and that makes him scum..

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 19:39 GMT

#3321

##Vote: Papa_Smurf

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 19:54 GMT

#3327

I am here, won't vote for Sno for sho.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 20:32 GMT

#3339

No fucking way Umasi. debears makes a half-arsed case on Sno. Me & Grack say we won't vote for him. What's debears' next move?

Not trying to convince anyone, but instead "okay, then let's lynch kush". rofl.
People just do not drop their scumreads if someone says "i disagree"..

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 20:48 GMT

#3343

Umasi please rephrase your mason logs with debears.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 20:57 GMT

#3346

Umasi.. I am going to be so mad at you if you allow debears to convince you to mislynch Oats.. ffs..

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 20:59 GMT

#3348

##Unvote:

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 20:59 GMT

#3349

Okay who do we lynch. I really do not want to lynch kush.
Oats? Is it Oats + Vayne then?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 21:09 GMT

#3368

##Vote: kushmasta
All-in. No time to analyze the claim fully. Seems legit.
I am just going with the cop and town!Pandain.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 21:13 GMT

#3380

On September 20 2013 06:11 VayneAuthority wrote:

Show nested quote +

if there's 4 blue roles in a 15 man game ill eat my own dick, it would confirm papa_smurf as scum using a fake claim to save himself.

lol, he has claimed to Umasi before being a lynch candidate.
No way he is lying.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 21:14 GMT

#3383

I'll go back to the kush + Vayne scum theory..

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 21:16 GMT

#3388

wtf are you talking about kush?
Why would debears not ask for a fakeclaim and instead write one of his own? roflll--

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 21:18 GMT

#3394

So he decided to fakeclaim the main character of the lore and a cop knowing there is a Godfather!!
rofl!

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

September 19 2013 21:20 GMT

#3401

Okay so scum is in kush/vayne/oats. vayne can't be SK. I don't think kush is SK.
SK is Sno or Oats, Sno is definitely not scum.

Now, who do we lynch?