like, you came back to the thread 3 hours after your previous post, and you really felt no compulsion to comment on anything, but to just drop a vote and leave?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 15:36 GMT

#2844

I'm actually once again really annoyed by the host things at the end of Day 1. It's next to impossible to make anywhere near as firm judgements on anything as you're supposed to be able to because of how far out of whack the deadlines were.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 15:53 GMT

#2853

On September 25 2013 00:46 ObviousOne wrote:

Show nested quote +

Wow what's this all about. You making this about me, now? This is a big game. I'm not going to talk about every person in the game probably, even by the end. If I didn't mention him D1 then he wasn't a scum read. So.... I don't see where you're going with this. I just came to an official public decision.

Problem?

I think the idea is that if someone is a main candidate for lynch and you have a townread on them, it's probably a good idea to mention it.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 15:55 GMT

#2857

Matt, you need to make more of an effort.

I think you're town on "feels", but I won't defend you, because the allegations against you have merit, and I could be wrong.

Time to shine, my boy.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:00 GMT

#2860

Tempting to vote you for being a moron.

However, I shall refrain.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:01 GMT

#2862

On September 25 2013 01:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Don't do it dude - refraining is for pussies. You're not a pussy are you marv?

I'm a well-known pussy

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:02 GMT

#2863

I mean the best reason for Matt being scum is that he thinks I'm scum. And thought yamato was scum.

Ridiculously bad if town. But it's Matt, so, ya know.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:08 GMT

#2870

His reasoning for attacking me is so god-damn bad that it's almost hard to believe it isn't genuine. That's the thing :/

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:09 GMT

#2871

On September 25 2013 01:00 Mattchew wrote:
I dont want scum defending me marv

as a counterpoint to what i just posted, this is just stupid, because it doesn't suggest any give and take on his stance on me. meh.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:12 GMT

#2877

Tell me VE. Have you ever heard anyone accuse someone before in the first cycle for "not being afraid to die"?

I mean, wtf is that? How is that even a thing?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:13 GMT

#2878

On September 25 2013 01:10 Mattchew wrote:
We should lynch marv because he is alive

##Vote: Mattchew

squirm,bitch.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:14 GMT

#2879

On September 25 2013 01:10 Mattchew wrote:
We should lynch marv because he is alive

I've not been nightkilled in my last 3 towngames

sup son?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:22 GMT

#2887

On September 25 2013 01:20 Mattchew wrote:
Yeah i didnt say im reading along and posting from my phone like under an hour ago or anything

That excuses your pointless attitude towards me?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:23 GMT

#2888

Erm. I'm unvoting. Will 'splain later.

##unvote

No, I will not explain now.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:25 GMT

#2891

I retract my unvote. I'm stupid.

##Vote: Mattchew

geript: there's no conclusions to be drawn. You've not even offered any. What "track" do you think we're on?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:29 GMT

#2896

On September 25 2013 01:26 VisceraEyes wrote:

Show nested quote +

No I get what he was saying. He just wasn't familiar with your meta of playing fearlessly regardless of role or alignment. But yeah, I could get the whole "not afraid to die" thing. Scum know they aren't getting night-killed right? So they make assumptions about what they'll do the following day and shit like that not taking into account the fact that they might get nightkilled.

That was not odd to me. What's odd to me is his insistence that you should die for being alive. That IS odd.

I can't think of a single instance where someone's been accused on the basis that Matt accused me. Certainly not on cycle 1, and I don't think any cycle.

Can you think of an example?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:29 GMT

#2898

It's my '10' penis.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:32 GMT

#2904

On September 25 2013 01:30 VisceraEyes wrote:

Show nested quote +

No, I just understand the accusation. I don't care about precedents. I care about whether the line of thought makes sense or not.

Do you not understand the idea behind it or are you just salty that I don't agree that that particular instance of it is scummy?

I care about precedents, because it shows it's not something that's occurred to accuse people of before in any other game in my mafia memory. Which suggests it's either a) fabricated or b) large paranoia.

I understand what the concept is supposed to be, but it's just nonsense.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:40 GMT

#2909

If anyone was curious about my little unvote-vote tango, it was because I remembered/found this:

On September 24 2013 13:21 Mattchew wrote:
Lol im like conf town mutha truckahs

And thought, oh my, we're lynching the doctor! So I unvoted. Then kept browsing his filter and noted that yamato was a scumread of his, so it makes zero sense for him having protected yamato. So I revoted.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

September 24 2013 16:45 GMT

#2911

Because successful saves are notified, and if he were doctor protecting yamato he'd be notified that he did so (with yam confirming it).

It's not complicated Moc D: