|
On August 09 2013 03:28 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid. As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone. I don't see any actual scum motivation in forwarding the role name, so I don't think you even have a reason to lie about this. Definitely not lynchworthy stuff. What was your basis for hiding Oatsmaster's identity, by the way? Or at least aiding in hiding it? It feels very stupid to argue something for so long with incomplete information.
No real reasoning other than I don't see the point. I don't think Oats' townread on me is justified so it wouldn't change the discussion. Oats tends to be around at this time anyway so why not wait for him.
@Risen
I strongly disagree on Dandel. Yes he kind of messed up the thread but he put himself in the spotlight and put strong pressure on Koshi.
Your case on Xatalos seems compelling but it relies on Xatalos being a good mafia player. I think I recognize the name but haven't been in games with him. That said I see town ask questions to which there is only one answer (or the answer is useless) all the time.
Look at oats his recent post about his pm interaction with me and tell me if that changes your mind about him at all please. I think you should also look at Oats' filter in the recently played "Titanic Mafia" cause he does this as town.
Grack's "Black Sheep" comment you're misinterpreting I think. It refers to all the other lords being vets and him not being a vet. I haven't really read in to him much so don't have much of an opinion on him.
All in all, your post is huge and has some valid points but you're stretching some stuff and I don't see the reason to post FOUR scumreads, instead of one concise case.
|
On August 09 2013 03:54 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Wait what? YOU are Ser Redacted? And when asked if something interested happened in the confines of your house (Winterfell, apparently), you decided to keep this rather controversial situation to the thread, saying that everything was groovy? Explain yourself. Also, whatever gambit that was, it is atrocious. It doesn't sound indicative of Clarity's allegiance at all. It sounds like he gave you his real name and you derped it up, by claiming some nonsense name magic. I don't understand at all how you deduce that he is not a Blackfyre infiltrant from that, unless you were already privy to that information and were just dicking around. While I often find it hard to uncover your motivations for doing things, this seems like a particularly stupid gaff. At first my grievances were with your lord, but it's possible that your entire house is Blackfyre scum?
Yes because obviously with that exchange between me and oats, the possibility that we're both scum somehow still remains? But yeah, whether I am town or scum I'd have reacted the same way, most likely. That said, do you think Oats as scum pushes me really hard for my rolename (he underemphasized this, it was like 5 pms each of him asking me rolename and me asking "why?") and then when I refuse to give it he makes up a role like that?
Seems a bit farfetched for scum just to "dick around"
|
On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote: So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum.
So I told Oats snb's rolename, and then oats told snb that I told him his rolename?
|
|
On August 09 2013 04:03 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 04:00 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 03:53 Oberyn wrote: Dandel is playing thread bully and I'm strongly considering switching my vote to put him in time out. Nearly every player (koshi, sol, s&B, risen) that has brought up suspicion of dandel, he has responded by attacking their abilities and suggesting that they could be scum. This is extremely indicative of mafia play.
Could the Lannisters explain to me why they felt iamp was the best choice as Lord? What the heck? If you think that's extremely indicative of Mafia play, you should take a look at DI's earlier games. He's active and spammy as town, inactive and useless as scum. Which do you think fits him here? I preferred myself, but gumshoe preferred iamperfection and grackaroni also agreed with iamperfection being our Lord. I wasn't opposed to iamperfection either, just preferred myself (naturally I know I can trust myself 100%). I think the scumteam has coached him to post this way so he appears to be playing to a town meta.
So you agree that he appears like his town meta. But you seem really confident he's scum? I don't even....
|
On August 09 2013 04:07 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 04:05 Onegu wrote:On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote: So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum. This makes zero sense why not do that in scum qt if both scum, or even bring it up to SnB why not keep it to themselves? Alrighty last post before da beech. I think the PM chain was a scumslip on their part. I think they were supposed to keep it to themselves. I don't think the interaction between Clarity and Oats was supposed to come to light which is why Clarity ended up lying in the PM chain then having to backtrack on it. Clarity probably told Oats the role name, that got revealed because Oats goofed or something, then they had to concoct a story to fit.
Way to take the simplest explanation.
So I as scum told oats as scum (in a pm, instead of in the qt) that snb shared his rolename. Then, oats, STILL AS SCUM, sent a pm to snb and ACCIDENTALLY told snb that I told him his rolename.
What in the flying fuck
|
On August 09 2013 04:13 Chromatically wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 04:10 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 04:07 Risen wrote:On August 09 2013 04:05 Onegu wrote:On August 09 2013 04:01 Risen wrote: So yeah Clarity's interaction with REDACTED makes much more sense to me now. He told REDACTED about snb's role b/c they were scum mates. Clarity_nl is scum. This makes zero sense why not do that in scum qt if both scum, or even bring it up to SnB why not keep it to themselves? Alrighty last post before da beech. I think the PM chain was a scumslip on their part. I think they were supposed to keep it to themselves. I don't think the interaction between Clarity and Oats was supposed to come to light which is why Clarity ended up lying in the PM chain then having to backtrack on it. Clarity probably told Oats the role name, that got revealed because Oats goofed or something, then they had to concoct a story to fit. Way to take the simplest explanation. So I as scum told oats as scum (in a pm, instead of in the qt) that snb shared his rolename. Then, oats, STILL AS SCUM, sent a pm to snb and ACCIDENTALLY told snb that I told him his rolename. What in the flying fuck You think this makes him scum?
I have no fucking clue. But I hate the argument "too dumb to be scum" He's really out there though, not a good lynch day1
Although Risen. The way you're currently playing (you currently have FIVE scumreads, FOUR of which are apparantly strong) is disruptive. Tone it down and take a bit more time to come to conclusions
|
rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously.
On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia? All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles? wat grack is in my house? Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken. I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful.
Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap.
|
On August 09 2013 05:02 kushm4sta wrote: All this redacted stuff is confusing after the fact...who did we learn was scum? clarity?
Everytime it says redacted, insert oats.
On August 09 2013 05:03 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 03:39 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:28 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid. As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone. I don't see any actual scum motivation in forwarding the role name, so I don't think you even have a reason to lie about this. Definitely not lynchworthy stuff. What was your basis for hiding Oatsmaster's identity, by the way? Or at least aiding in hiding it? It feels very stupid to argue something for so long with incomplete information. Your case on Xatalos seems compelling but it relies on Xatalos being a good mafia player. By the way how was Risen's case "compelling" at all...? It was based on DI being scum and similarly stupid assumptions. The only somewhat reasonable point in there was me asking filler questions and you even continued by saying that you "see townies asking questions with only one answer all the time"........... Also, don't you consider me a good scum player? I think I'm much better as scum than as town.
The thing you pointed out as justified was compelling. I liked your admission of it though. I don't think I've played with you at all (maybe once a long time ago) so I don't consider you anything. Me saying "it relies on him being a good player" was more of a question than a statement.
On August 09 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote:rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously. On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia? All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles? wat grack is in my house? Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken. I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful. Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap. I´m sorry, that was not obvious to me because of the RP. You did not answer me btw. What do you think of FT & Onegu?
I think onegu smells fishy, mainly because of him soft defending people twice (FT and myself). I think the reasons in your giant opening post are less than stellar, though. I don't know anything about FT except for what's been posted about n0 pms
|
On August 09 2013 05:12 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 05:08 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 05:02 kushm4sta wrote: All this redacted stuff is confusing after the fact...who did we learn was scum? clarity? Everytime it says redacted, insert oats. On August 09 2013 05:03 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 03:39 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:28 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.
So events happened like this.
I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever. Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys? Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid. As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone. I don't see any actual scum motivation in forwarding the role name, so I don't think you even have a reason to lie about this. Definitely not lynchworthy stuff. What was your basis for hiding Oatsmaster's identity, by the way? Or at least aiding in hiding it? It feels very stupid to argue something for so long with incomplete information. Your case on Xatalos seems compelling but it relies on Xatalos being a good mafia player. By the way how was Risen's case "compelling" at all...? It was based on DI being scum and similarly stupid assumptions. The only somewhat reasonable point in there was me asking filler questions and you even continued by saying that you "see townies asking questions with only one answer all the time"........... Also, don't you consider me a good scum player? I think I'm much better as scum than as town. The thing you pointed out as justified was compelling. I liked your admission of it though. I don't think I've played with you at all (maybe once a long time ago) so I don't consider you anything. Me saying "it relies on him being a good player" was more of a question than a statement. On August 09 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 09 2013 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote:rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously. On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia? All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles? wat grack is in my house? Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken. I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful. Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap. I´m sorry, that was not obvious to me because of the RP. You did not answer me btw. What do you think of FT & Onegu? I think onegu smells fishy, mainly because of him soft defending people twice (FT and myself). I think the reasons in your giant opening post are less than stellar, though. I don't know anything about FT except for what's been posted about n0 pms Hm. How come that filler point was the compelling part of his case, yet you continued with "I see townies asking questions with only one answer all the time"? Or was that more of a mitigating point to the original point?
That was saying that that point on itself does not a scum make, yes. Maybe compelling was the wrong word to use. It had some merit is what I was trying to say.
|
on its own* English is hard.
|
I can tell you that vivax told me he didn't run for lord because he wouldn't be that active in the earlygame but that's about it. Oats seems to have a townread on him but I haven't conversed with him much. Nothing alignment indicative anyway. Looking at that post though, it seems more aggressive towards Koshi than defensive towards Oats. Although the post itself does both, obviously.
After the game we just played together, I can't say I blame him for not calling Koshi scum at this point. (Titanic Mafia)
|
I like being a traffic cop. Traffic being smooth is important. Do I have any scumreads? No strong ones, Onegu probably my strongest. We'll see what Risen does when he comes back.
You say Dandel looks town but his lord campaign was "odd" (what does that mean?) and he lied to you? Another question: Do you think the line you bolded makes sense to think of as scum? I definitely don't think that a 3p would talk about the idea of a 3p. I don't see how this line of thought would be more likely to come from scum than from town.
|
If you had made notes while reading the thread you should already know every house' list.
|
vivax is in stark, gumshoe is in lannister
|
Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?
#Trafficcop
|
On August 09 2013 06:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote: Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?
#Trafficcop If you mean me & Acro, it already happened in PM´s..
Why is it happening again in the thread? Are you accusing him of something? Or are you trying to convince him his plan (whatever it is) is bad?
|
On August 09 2013 06:55 jrkirby wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote: Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?
#Trafficcop We cannot PM people outside our houses, right?
lords can pm all other lords
|
No it's not. I did do something he asked me not to do, though.
|
On August 09 2013 11:15 s0Lstice wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote: Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?
#Trafficcop Clarity my boy. I see no reason not to assume that you think your play so far has been pro-town. With that said, what are you doing here? If your thread directing is useful and pro-town, what is with the self-conscious acknowledgement of the behavior? If it's protown then you should just be carrying on. It seems like you have some inherent guilt here.
Merely poking fun at you for calling me a traffic cop. Ofcourse I become aware of it when you point it out. I don't know how that's inherent guilt, or why, as any alignment, I would feel guilty for trying to avoid people shitting up the thread.
Are you calling me scum, or are you just pointing out something as "noteworthy"? If you're gonna push something, push it.
On August 09 2013 08:35 Chromatically wrote: Why isn't everyone voting Sol already?
I agree with this.
The rayn/acro shitfest that happened was dumb. One side saying that the other is COMPLETELY MISREPRESENTING ME when they use a slightly different word or interpretation is useless. I dunno why you guys are voting eachother, but please find out if your vote is to lynch or if your vote is OMGUS.
rayn saying "I'll reconsider my read if you tell me the plan" can easily come from town Likewise, acro being protective of his plan seems more likely town than scum. Issues with oberyn not withstanding (he called it a joint effort so you think he's scum?)
In fact, oberyn..... please walk me through this You vote him because he is buddying up to you.. fair enough I guess? Not sure how that makes him more likely scum that solstice but let's roll with it.
On August 09 2013 08:20 Oberyn wrote: I'm not really sure what you're rambling about Acro. You essentially took my plan from my first post, decided that you and me worked on it together (I have no idea where that comes from) and now won't share it for whatever reason.
I'm still suspicious of sol, but for now I'm going to:
##Unvote ##Vote Acrofales Then you emphasize the buddying up part:
On August 09 2013 08:50 Oberyn wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 08:24 Acrofales wrote:On August 09 2013 08:20 Oberyn wrote: I'm not really sure what you're rambling about Acro. You essentially took my plan from my first post, decided that you and me worked on it together (I have no idea where that comes from) and now won't share it for whatever reason.
I'm still suspicious of sol, but for now I'm going to:
##Unvote ##Vote Acrofales What the hell are you smoking? Here is the first thing you sent to me about using magic: Onegu told me that he wants to use the hp check on day one, which would give the mafia an idea of how many kp it takes to eliminate a player with their night hits. I've had a town read on him otherwise. Do you think there is any benefit to wanting to use it early as town?
Here is your second missive, after my reply: You say that it is important for us to know to coordinate our shots, but then want to use it on your own hosue? Does that suggest that you want the Lords to fire in your house? Wouldn't it make more sense to use it on the house you want to fire into? And MY REPLY to that is the plan. After this we have not communicated about using the magic, and were discussing Yamato. Exactly. Nothing there points to us working together on come to your plan. It gives me the creeps that you decide to bring up three different times that I helped formulate the idea as if we're working behind the scenes to come up with something incredibly pro-town. I feel like you're buddying up to me in that sense. Furthermore, the plan isn't so great that you have to keep it a secret from rayn. You're overstating your contribution right now. Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 06:44 Acrofales wrote: Are you upset because I am unwilling to disclose with you the way the Red Viper, Sharrant and myself came up with a way of potentially foiling a Blackfyre plot by using our life check magic? Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 08:11 Acrofales wrote: I also made an allusion to the plan concocted by Sharrant, the Red Viper and myself Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 06:44 Acrofales wrote: Are you upset because I am unwilling to disclose with you the way the Red Viper, Sharrant and myself came up with.
All is cool up until this point. He's buddying up to you, he's overstating his contributions. These are decent points. Here comes the thing I have an issue with though:
On August 09 2013 09:02 Oberyn wrote: More on Acrofales:
I first contact him via pm's because I found his conclusion that DI and koshi are both town quite puzzling. When I asked about it futher, he explained that he doesn't think DI truly thinks that sol and koshi are scum, he is simply pressuring them. Based on DI's emotional tunnel, I certainly do not draw the same conclusion. He also inadequately explains why koshi is town. He states that DI is overreacting on his views about koshi., but how is this indicative of koshi's alignment? He states that he isn't interested in considering a koshi lynch, but doesn't provide a solid reason. Furthermore, if you earlier thought that DI was faking his read on koshi to pressure him, how is he suddenly overreacting on his read? That's a contradiction.
Initially, he thought that it was a good idea to use the health check simply to figure out the hp system. This is incredibly anti-town. When I attack him for his plan, he quickly drops it.
Acro's house is a slew of inactives, but he has shown little interest in dealing with them.
In the thread, Acro has said a lot of nothing. He is using the role playing nonsense to cover up the fact that he isn't sharing many strong reads. I see little reason why he shouldn't be considered for a lynch today.
Suddenly every interaction you've ever had with acro points to him being scum? Why didn't we hear from this earlier? You had not mentioned any of these points until now. Could anyone from Oberyn's house say if he ever mentioned these things before, and whether or not he talked about acro possibly being scum?
You had a vote on him for one concise reason, implying you could lynch him for just that reason, and then you felt the need to suddenly attach 5 more reasons. Why is that, Oberyn?
|
|
|
|