RL stuff..
Newbie Mini Mafia XLIV - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
RL stuff.. | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
/in Sorry Alakaslam | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
Blazinghand bringing down the hammer XD | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
But seriously man, let's get this game started ^^ | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 10 2013 08:30 StiMaDDict wrote: WHOA!! Blazinghand bringing down the hammer XD ![]() User was warned for this post | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
I don't mind the warning but why am I reported? - not directed to anyone. don't respond XD | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
Can we start a pregame mafia or whatever it is? XD | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
much <3 | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
| ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 12 2013 03:54 Rainbows wrote: Bump for great justice. ONE MORE SPOT 2 more spots actually.. | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 12 2013 05:04 Rainbows wrote: Jkirby scum or vig cant tell He's a scum! KILL HIM!!! jkjk XD | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
| ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
| ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
| ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 13 2013 05:10 Umasi wrote: all you have to do is maintain insane activity levels. otherwise I'll lynch you on meta Yep, I TOTALLY maintain insne activity level. *wink wink | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
| ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Sponge posting his Early Day 1 Conversation Starter? Sponge posting his Early Day 1 Conversation Starter. The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Pre-written segment starts now: 3 points to raise, in order of importance from highest priority to lowest. 1.) This game is Majority lynch: There will be 2(+) wagons per day. By the end of the day, you need to pick scummiest one and join it (no lynch = bad). Don't tunnel your read at the cost of town kp (e.g. the lynch). If you don't think either wagon is more scummier than the other, analyze the people on each wagon. You'll find you trust one of the groups of voters more than the other, even if your feelings on the lynch candidates are a wash. CAVEAT: Feel free to hold out as long as you feel is necessary during the day to make your point. Ideally, you'll join a wagon a couple hours before the deadline. If there's 12 hours left, scumhunt the hell out of the guy no one is looking at. Hell, you might be able to get a serious wagon going on him. But if that clock is counting down, and your vote is flying solo, I don't want to hear "Oh, I was going to switch at the last second, but my internet went out" if it cost us a lynch for that day. 2.) Pet peeve: There is a separate voting thread for this game. No ninja votes. Disclose all votes and unvotes redundantly in this thread. Ninja votes may not be a scum tell, but I would consider it a personal favor. 3.) One of the big pieces of advice I keep hearing from the veterans is to not use meta in these newbie games. I took this advice one step further: I submit that unless you make a concentrated effort, you will subconsciously naturally use what little meta you have on your fellow players when making crucial decisions. In short. "Don't Use Meta" is not a call for inaction, but rather a call to actively eliminate meta arguments and bias from your decision-making process. Upon realizing the importance of identifying my own biases, I am hereby disclosing everything I think I know now. If you catch me treating you based on any of the following, ask me to support it with analysis from this game if you feel I'm being unfair or displaying bias: (quicklist) Xzavier: strong townie reads, poor scumhunter (susceptible to OMGUS). contributes to discussion when questioned directly. syntax and post construction can sometimes be an issue. inconsistent activity level (can be a high volume poster or post in blocks in the same game). Been Mislynched in last two games- implies poor ability to defend pressure as town. unknown scum game. hz: strong approach to the game. methodical analysis that leads to accurate reads as town. as town: willing to post elaborate conspiracy theories for public scrutiny to vet all possible venues of analysis ('no stone unturned'-type player). "This guy is Town that thinks like Scum but posts with pro-town logic. Very dangerous." - Ace Himself (NMMXLIII Scum QT) (powerful ally as town, dangerous foe as scum). can scumhunt solo or lead town as town. if you reach endgame or near-endgame with him and think he's been too good a player to be scum, re-evaluate. he is that good. Umasi: volume poster as town. (11 pages of filter in the 84-page NMMXLII) posts can be emotional but often contain strong arguments / positions or other useful content. Analysis skills may be suspect (poor voting history in NMMXLII), and may tilt from pressure as town. Has shown willingness to tunnel as town. Chromatically: strong analyzer of both town and scum. has the ability to drive town discussion in positive directions as town. sheepable in this format (majority lynch) if townieness is confirmed / likely. Gotard: low activity level. (In 84 pages of Newbie Mini Mafia XLII, amassed only a 3-page filter despite being the primary wagon on day 1) unknown analysis ability. tends to follow wagons as town. post content generally short-and-sweet (1-liners that get to the point when not making cases)- very little fluff. Sponge: volume poster- high activity level. (15 pages of filter in 99-page NMMXLIII) content-based poster. weak town reads (slow to trust; defaults to town consensus). mediocre scum reads (more data needed). weakness to pre-flip relationships, NK analysis, and trying to 'solve' Power Roles as town. StiMaDDict: notorious lurker as town. general contribution is one post per day: a massive case on someone right before the lynch deadline. willing to target popular and unpopular targets with his vote as town. weird self-voting meltdown in NMMXLII implies a certain level of Crazy in this player. Posting is generally content / analysis-driven (low fluff). More data needed. The above are all characterized as Player Tendencies. When looking over the list, I noticed the wide range of behaviors and how none of them are actually Scum (and only a couple are Town) tells. I feel this is useful (to myself, but maybe also to you) because it provides a baseline to check if the scum evidence being used could actually just fit into a sub-optimal townster profile." If anyone else feels it would be productive to disclose their player tendencies, now's as good a time as any. This guy.. *gentleman slow claps First of all, way better first post than the last game. Analysis on most of each player is very impressive, however you only meant it as a reference since it does contradict with your point #3, right? I second your point #1. You have plenty of time, people. Make a case if someone does seem suspicious to you and push aggressively for his/her lynch, however if the wagon didn't form close to the deadline, do review whatever wagon is on the table and vote out of those. On a side note, I can't really play my usual style of lurking and making a case at last second because of above reason. I will try to avoid it. | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? Want me to elaborate? | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
Also my read on jrkirby is null. This is a response to a request for elaboration from Rainbow. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 07:41 jrkirby wrote: Ok. I've been studying this long and hard, and I think I have enough evidence to make a clear case. hzflank is scum Clearly, hzflank is lying about this compliment. Liars are always scum. And look who he's talking to: the scum coach. Obviously he's in league with them. He goes on, still talking to the scum: This is an obvious admission that he wants town to die. Anyone who wants town to die is scum, end of story. I will. Right here, right now. Pregame posts when people didn't even get their role pm are evidence to his case. Do I need to say more? Clearly, hzflank is lying about this compliment. Liars are always scum. And look who he's talking to: the scum coach. Obviously he's in league with them. Not sure where he is going with this one..He goes on, still talking to the scum: This is an obvious admission that he wants town to die. Anyone who wants town to die is scum, end of story. He hasn't even fucking got his role pm and he's joking around pregame.I will. Right here, right now. ok..+ Show Spoiler + And for his first post: He's trying to get us to sheep together and follow a Bandwagon instead of looking for evidence and finding scum. Finally: Trying to defend one of the scum who is planning to lurk. You can't ignore all this evidence guys. hzflank is scum. ##Vote: hzflank And for his first post: I am not trying to defend hzflank in any shape or form however I do not agree with jrkirby's "read" on hzflank's post and I do not think it was alignment indicative. He's trying to get us to sheep together and follow a Bandwagon instead of looking for evidence and finding scum. Finally: Again I do not think this post point hzflank as a scum. Trying to defend one of the scum who is planning to lurk. | ||
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. Explanation: I find a pressure vote to be a strategy for some people. It works sometimes but not all the times. jrkirby's "case" really is not something of content to be honest. I assumed that it was pressure vote to get some discussions going. So that is what I said. As for the second sentence, his "case" is really fucking bullshit, so there are two possibilities. Either he is joking around or he suck at scumhunting. Now let's look at how Rainbow made me sound like. On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? Scummy? Yes, I did give jkirby's post a reason but I didn't doubt it. If I had said it was a joke vote and he didn't seem to be a joker, your statement makes sense. I said pressure vote and nothing more. On July 13 2013 08:28 Rainbows wrote: Yes. What is odd about his vote? Why ia this joking around suspicious? I didn't fucking say it was odd. Jesus, give me a break. I NEVER FUCKING SAID IT WAS SUSPICIOUS. Note to all: + Show Spoiler + btw, I'm really trying to stay active. Sometimes I write really slow and I might be answering something that is couple of pages back. Sometimes I write one liners. My bad. + Show Spoiler + If you don't like it, well fuck you | ||
| ||