PTP IV - Demon's Run - Page 4

On June 24 2013 05:12 s0Lstice wrote:
WoS, you voted me on a meta argument based on one game.

mind bottling, you can't be serious right now

On June 24 2013 05:19 kitaman27 wrote:
I'd much rather do s0Lsticec than S&B. For me, s&b is a complete lurker null, compared to s0L where I'm leaning mafia.

WoS, if you'll stop at nothing to see him flipped, why are you so quick to conclude that he's not getting lynched?

On June 24 2013 05:22 gonzaw wrote:
snb is getting modkilled/replaced (hasn't voted) right?

Fuck I haven't even finished reading the thread, much less filters.

Fuck this

##Unvote: Zepphird
##Vote: solstice

Come on sheep me

Zepphird still looks bad...but I get a little less confident based on him being Zepphird. I get the feeling he'd be scummy looking as town as well, and I dunno about some stuff he posts I can't really read it well

I get more inclined to solstice. He acted with an aggressive approach to all pressure against him, my case, etc. He goes around like he's 100% confident Zepphird is scum, and well I don't like that attitude.
I don't like his attitude of "tough macho guy" he's putting (seems he's acting like he's BH or something), and in contrast with his initial behaviour back in early D1 I just feel it's a weird contrast, I don't really think he'd have that contrast as town.

Not many people commented on him other than Xatalos and others.


Hey kita, you make a whole post explaining why solstice is scum but you vot sk8 wtf?

On June 24 2013 05:24 Kurumi wrote:
I am not swapping out of sk8r.
I am not buying how he suddenly turned out not to be scum and how crossfire helped you to believe that.

On June 24 2013 06:45 Zephirdd wrote:
Welp.

I don't think geript is mafia.
I do think the austin lynch had no mafia on it(Dandel,Xatalos,kitaman,xfire,gonzaw all feel townie to me, xfire less than others but not that much).

I think that if austin was town, scum would make sure to hammer him 100% as it would not bring in that much suspicion towards the hammer(it was a wtf-wagon)

I think M_Z disappearing conveniently is bad
I think Kurumi tunneling sk8r is bad
I think austin and BC being afk is bad
I think that the way the sk8r wagon worked makes him look bad, but a lot of shit I said about sk8r had a basic assumption which was wrong
I think WoS is TOO inactive for his own good, and that he was a much better player on roulette

@Xatalos
killing an extra town player on day 1 is extremely beneficial for scum because it's one less PR to worry about.

On June 24 2013 06:49 Kurumi wrote:

He is dead, he's gone, he is not coming back.
Unless someone really wanted to recreate what I did in one of the PTP games.

On June 24 2013 10:15 austinmcc wrote:
First you let your buddies shoot me in the game.

Now you try to lynch me in THIS game, where I get my own friggin' role. Marv isn't here this time either. So...it's you or kita. You guys are the PTP fun police.

On June 24 2013 10:13 gonzaw wrote:


This?

Well....I dunno.

In my personally experience, I want the guy that gets my role to:
-Be town
-Live until LYLO (or a lot) so he can use it.

I'd personally like knowing who got my role to analyze that stuff. I don't want someone dying and flipping my role without him using it first and experiencing fully
If I was scum I'd like to know who got my role to NOT shoot him at night and let him live until end-game or something (unless there's a party-pooper marv in my scumteam >_> ), so if a scum made your role...congrats you are going to live for a long time

Also I dunno if YOU got my role. You said something like "This role is awesome!" and "I know who made my role! :D" which,considering my role is....let's say "peculiar", makes me think you got it lol

On June 24 2013 10:24 gonzaw wrote:
Well, it's either true or a scumbuddy of his made his role.

If it's the 2nd one, then his scumbuddy CANT claim he made austin's role, so whose role does his scumbuddy claim he made?
There are 4 options:
1)Another player:
Then the guy that REALLY made that guy's role will cc and he's toast
2)Another player, but someone another scumbuddy of his made the role of:
Then the same process is repeated with the other scumbuddy, who has no character to claim he made the role of
3)Himself:
Because you are going to believe 2 people saying "I made my own role!", instead of one of them saying he made austin's?
4)The player austin made the role of:
In this case, austin makes the role of player X, but claims he made his own. In fact a scumbuddy made his role, and now the scumbuddy claims he made player X's role.
If so....for what purpose? This doesn't make any sense other than convince people "there's little chance austin made his own role! He scum!".

Unless there is a convincing reason (4) could have happened, then it's most likely true, regardless of his alignment (or maybe he is scum with BC and they did (3) lol)