|
On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 14:56 Kurumi wrote:
For a moment I thought I was still drunk after yesterday but this thread actually makes no sense.
No trolling for me I guess.
We're running the classic lynch, so the most votes person dies? LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote:On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 11:54 Crossfire99 wrote:
##Pants: WaveofShadow
I'm going to bed now. I'm gone all day tomorrow and doubt that I will be able to post. I should be around Sunday, though. Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote:
In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form.
Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game.
##Vote BloodyC0bbler
We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game.
##Vote BloodyC0bbler
We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul. Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote:
I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript.
BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum?
It's simple numbers.would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote:
I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript.
BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP
.....
You gotta be trolling
|
|
|
On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 14:56 Kurumi wrote:
For a moment I thought I was still drunk after yesterday but this thread actually makes no sense.
No trolling for me I guess.
We're running the classic lynch, so the most votes person dies? LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote:On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 11:54 Crossfire99 wrote:
##Pants: WaveofShadow
I'm going to bed now. I'm gone all day tomorrow and doubt that I will be able to post. I should be around Sunday, though. Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote:
In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form.
Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game.
##Vote BloodyC0bbler
We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game.
##Vote BloodyC0bbler
We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul. Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote:
I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript.
BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum?
It's simple numbers.would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote:
I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript.
BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum.
he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math.
RIGHT?!?!??!1
|
On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 14:56 Kurumi wrote:
For a moment I thought I was still drunk after yesterday but this thread actually makes no sense.
No trolling for me I guess.
We're running the classic lynch, so the most votes person dies? LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote:On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 11:54 Crossfire99 wrote:
##Pants: WaveofShadow
I'm going to bed now. I'm gone all day tomorrow and doubt that I will be able to post. I should be around Sunday, though. Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote:
In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form.
Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:36 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
I'm coming in STRONG guys. Time to make a huge impression on my first game.
##Vote BloodyC0bbler
We aren't allowed to hint at our role right? I don't have any meta advantages like the rest of you guys, so I'll just be going by my gut. Oh I'm so impressed. Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:
[quote]
Oh I'm so impressed.
Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul. Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote:
I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript.
BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum?
It's simple numbers.would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:On June 23 2013 03:45 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
You didn't even bother answering why you aren't pushing your scum reads. Why aren't you? Making lists with 0 reasoning behind it or solid commitment to your read is useless and is incredibly scummy. You are my scum read, which I have committed to pushing. Making a day 1 list of who I think is scummy is not scummy. Of course i'm not going to push them, because really they are just lists. If you want to be technical, yes I was not serious when I said 100%. It's day 1, you should assume that I was not 100% sure. Defending and discrediting me so hard on day one however, is scummy. Hearing that you died d1 your past few PTP's makes me feel bad. I might consider doing a pity unvote. This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it. Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 03:17 Kurumi wrote:
I am known for trollish behaviour but I can't recall last time I made a picture for a Mafia game, that's Palmar or Blazinghand you're speaking of geript.
BC, do you think you might die to D1 lynch? Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling?
Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly.
Basically.
|
On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 17:40 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 14:56 Kurumi wrote:
For a moment I thought I was still drunk after yesterday but this thread actually makes no sense.
No trolling for me I guess.
We're running the classic lynch, so the most votes person dies? LOL. This post *would* be scummy if it showed any actual effort to be safe from lynching. Now, it seems more like a clueless town post. On the other hand, might be 100% clueless Mafia... Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time. Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote:On June 22 2013 23:43 Xatalos wrote:On June 22 2013 11:54 Crossfire99 wrote:
##Pants: WaveofShadow
I'm going to bed now. I'm gone all day tomorrow and doubt that I will be able to post. I should be around Sunday, though. Ugh. This is basically Crossfire99's whole contribution so far (not including his earlier one-liner). And it seems like it'll remain that way for the rest of D1. Not sure if such blatant lurking can even be called scummy, but it's at least definitely anti-town.. He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote:On June 22 2013 21:23 Acrofales wrote:
In general, I am pretty suspicious of those who have come into the thread and lamented the pitiful state it is in (Kurumi), yet have shown absolutely NO inclination to improve it in any way, shape or form.
Yadda yadda What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on. I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 22 2013 07:40 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:37 Dandel Ion wrote:
[quote]
Oh I'm so impressed.
Now could you respond to Wave's case on you? Thanks. His case has some merit, but I could point out some pretty obvious flaws in his arguments. WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws. he then responds to On June 22 2013 07:49 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 22 2013 07:42 Dandel Ion wrote:
[quote]
Well his arguments about your mental inability from refraining of posting cat pictures with the overarching connection theory that scum players tend to be cat people have a lot of merit, and his points about your easy acceptance of the confirmed scum flip acro's excuses also resonate deeply with my soul.
Look at austin. He's a dog person. that must mean he's town. You howver are a cat person. JUSTIFY THIS BULLSHIT Well I guess i'm going to have to reveal. I was blackmailed into only posting cat pictures. I promise I would never post a cat picture, it sickened me to have to go find those pictures and repost them for you guys. I think mafia right now are - COBBLER and his teammate who forced me to post cat pictures. Also uhm...I don't know how to say this without being awkward but....Can I get a ##Lovetap ? ##Lovetap Dandel Ion Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:
[quote]
This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it.
Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]
Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town. As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE" Can you stop making shit up please. Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum?
It's simple numbers.would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:04 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 03:49 s0Lstice wrote:
[quote]
This actually makes him look more town imo. The stuff you are doing in regards to him is not at all going to get him lynched, so as scum he would be free and without fear to let you call him scum with no reasoning, and to no effect, rather than put fuel on the fire by getting in your face about it.
Sure. You can see it that way. This is Day one, so a lot of my 100% scum reads are going to likely change. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. Then he tries to get me to change my vote to SnB. As you said, my pressure is not going to get him lynched so why would he care if he had one vote on him? I didn't want to be derailed. On June 23 2013 03:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]
Don't care if I do. Anyone dumb enough to lynch me day 1 is completely retarded. I get suspected every game day 1 and i am almost always town when this happens. Ptp is prime example of this. I actually had no meta experience of BC, so my voting did not matter from this. For a guy trying to be apathetic about getting killed day 1, he is trying very hard to keep that from happening. Against my very weak fos. Whoa, wow. This post is horrible and reeks of bias. First post, reveals that he has a cool/ good role. Which makes me think he has a poor role and wants to blend. You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that? Then he wants to deny me from activating my role. Along with other players. With 0 information on what it would be. A scum would not want a town to activate their role because they are unsure of what it could be. I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad? You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense.
No not at all.
He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite?
It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion"
|
|
|
On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works.
clearly the game works like this:
do nothing
tunnel a townie for no reason
shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for
genius.
|
On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:51 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 22 2013 18:09 Kurumi wrote:
[quote]
Take your stance, boy. I've been around here for quite some time.
Also, putting my vote on Dandel for creating a terrible, spammy atmosphere and not trying to change that. How is this mafia motivated? Hell, how is this even mafia favored? But it's nice to see you are actively combating an active thread full of posting by not posting yourself. PROTOWN! On June 22 2013 23:48 Acrofales wrote:
[quote]
He promised contribution on Sunday. It is now Saturday. Also, if Xfire is still as hilariously bad at scum as the last time I played with him, it'll be pretty easy. Not true last time I played with him he played as shitty as he does as scum but he was town. Still deserves a lynch obv, but it ain't that easy. On June 23 2013 01:02 Kurumi wrote:
[quote]
Yadda yadda
What could I do couple of hours into the game? Voted the most malicious player, remarked on bad atmosphere and moved on.
I am not going to post stuff that makes no sense just to look like I do stuff, I do stuff because I do stuff, not because I want to look like I do stuff. Yeah you remarked on the "bad" atmosphere and you didn't even try to change it. Instead do nothing, yay, protown. So either you thought the atmosphere was actually fine, or you were happy with it being bad. Which is it? On June 23 2013 04:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]
WoS has not posted a case yet apparently it has merit (how does a non existent argument have merit) it also apparently has flaws.
he then responds to
[quote]
Showing he is actively trolling with dandel. He is in no way attempting to create an atmosphere you can even play in while also attempting to get people to activate his role with 0 reasoning. Combined with his play I have already mentioned this guy is either the single worst player I have ever seen, or is scum. Considering you are completely misrepresenting a post of his, I don't think you have any position at all to call people bad. On June 23 2013 04:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]
Perhaps you should read up on my play. Me wanting to deny your use of role is exactly what I would do as town. I have no idea what your alignment is and only know my own. Why on earth would I want someone who could easily be mafia using their power? Roles do not equal alignment. Just because you have a role that potentially requires others to activate doesn't mean you are town.
As for hard to defend? I AM PRESSURING YOU TO GIVE REASONS FOR READS. I have no even attempted to say "NO DONT LYNCH ME NO PLEASEEEEE"
Can you stop making shit up please.
Because there's a 75% chance he's town and only a 25% he's scum?
It's simple numbers.would lynch BC. On June 23 2013 04:11 WaveofShadow wrote:
[quote]
Whoa, wow.
This post is horrible and reeks of bias.
[quote]
You have absolutely no way of knowing this whatsoever. My role is pretty damn hilarious. What does it mean that I just said that?
[quote]
I also denied you your role, you know, because you could be scum and giving you an advantage is bad?
You are completely neglecting to take into account town perspectives in your post at all, and it looks as though you're just trying as hard as you can to place BC in a scummy light. ^horrible shitflinging stahp plz -BC claims SK here- Yeah let's just lynch BC. Or Kurumi. Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have.
"hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before"
Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things.
Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum.
huhuhuhuhuhuhuh
Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25
|
On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 04:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:46 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
Since I have yet to flip, I'm going to assume that was a fake day vig kill. go for it, no hosts are around to activate it thus we wait. You aren't dead until they post. Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ.
I don't see how it makes him scum.
How does it make him scum BC?
|
BC still scum l8er broskis
|
On June 23 2013 05:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]
Please answer the bolded part. IE where is this information located. I can't find mafia team # in the OP
It always baffles me when people ask this. 16 players means 4 scum. he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math. RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise.
If it was absolute I would have said it was absolute.
You're the one blatantly putting words I never said in my mouth. (which is called lying btw.)
On June 23 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 04:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:52 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
[quote]
Well since I am thinking it's faked to try and get me to reveal more.....I will not be revealing any information. Honestly my reads are not good because it's day 1, killing me because of a poor fos on you is very strange. I would not have been able to get you lynched anyways. its not your FoS you tard. Its you actively lying/trolling. Dont like it? Don't troll and lie. I don't care if your reads are good or bad. Don't post em with 0 reasoning. Then don't actively lie and make shit up when under pressure. LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied. So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play.
See that's what I'm saying.
You can't even explain why he would be scum.
You're shooting him for being "anti-town" which like THE most easy and convenient excuse for scum because you don't need to explain a false scumread, which also means you won't be wrong, so you can pretend to be smart while blatantly shooting townies.
|
On June 23 2013 05:22 WaveofShadow wrote:
I'd still like to consider who is scum outside of BC for now.
Kurumi
|
On June 23 2013 05:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:23 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 04:59 Dandel Ion wrote:
[quote]
he's obviously trying to look like a terrible townie because obviously a townie wouldn't know basic math.
RIGHT?!?!??!1 Hey Dandel. Why would BC troll now when he's essentially basing everything he's done on the fact that Skater is trolling? Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly. Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise. If it was absolute I would have said it was absolute. You're the one blatantly putting words I never said in my mouth. (which is called lying btw.) On June 23 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:On June 23 2013 05:01 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 04:58 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
[quote]
LOL. I trolled when everyone was trolling. When people started being serious I stopped trolling. I never lied.
So players should all just hide in corners and never post their reads? That's a good way to prevent town from giving their opinions to eachother. What? I said dont post without reasonings. If you think x is town or x is mafia, why? The reasons you have for why someone is or isn't something is how other players can better base their own read on you -_- If i just generically post a list of who I think is town or mafia. What fucking information does that give you with no reasoning behind it? Dick fucking all. I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play. See that's what I'm saying. You can't even explain why he would be scum. You're shooting him for being "anti-town" which like THE most easy and convenient excuse for scum because you don't need to explain a false scumread, which also means you won't be wrong, so you can pretend to be smart while blatantly shooting townies. as much as I hate using it as an example go look at LXI. I as town, actively pushed people who were actively anti town. Why? Because I thought they were scum for it. I recognize day 1 skater could easily be a douchebag trolly town. However I am sick of dealing with players like that in games and finally have a gun to at least remove one cancer from the game.
why are you trying to play like in LXI? (need i remind you of the outcome?)
You could be trying to improve instead of repeating the same old mistakes, and you not doing so has a clear motivation as mafia since it's ez town meta to mold yourself into
As town, the explanation is basically that you are unwilling to learn from your mistakes. Do you want me to think that of you? Cuz it seems like you do.
|
On June 23 2013 05:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:41 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:23 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:08 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:05 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 05:02 Dandel Ion wrote:
[quote]
Well, because he's scum and not good enough as scum to fake contributions properly.
Basically. Then does his recent explanation of 'when it doesn't explicitly say' occur to you as being likely? Also fuck all these role teases and shit I wish it didn't help scum to know what these roles actually did so I could ask IM SO CURIOUSSSS So the fact that apparently Skater TRIED to get shot at night means there's some sort of reflect/protection/immunity involved? And the fact that Geript knows about it means he is the guy who wrote it. Given he was included in the lovetapping this probably makes sense. No not at all. He's crying that if there's an SK it's not EXACTLY 75%, so even if it's still 70%, clearly it's still totally bad for town amirite? It's stupid and irrelevant sematics and a terrible excuse to cling to his "opinion" Semantics? You used clear math as an absolute. Go fuck yourself. If the hosts haven't revealed a number you can easily say "it is likely 75% / 25%" Or some nonsense but using an absolute with hidden information implies knowledge town don't have. "hurr durr it's hidden information so I have to be town and you have to be scum because I'm acting clueless as if i never played mafia before" Actually no you don't even have the balls to call anybody scum, you just attack "anti-town" things. Whiiiiiiiiiiiiiiich is what scum do. Attacking anti-town instead of scum. huhuhuhuhuhuhuh Also you lied, I never said it was EXACTLY 75/25 you quoted the numbers and said it was simple math. You then called me a troll for asking how you got said numbers as if I must be crazy to not have them. Given how sure of yourself you were its an absolute. If you didn't phrase it the way you did or respond to my question the way you did then I would say you are right it wasn't an absolute. However your behaviour indicates otherwise. If it was absolute I would have said it was absolute. You're the one blatantly putting words I never said in my mouth. (which is called lying btw.) On June 23 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:13 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:10 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On June 23 2013 05:07 xxSK8rGUy277xx wrote:
[quote]
I don't think you understand how day 1's work I don't think you understand how this game works. clearly the game works like this: do nothing tunnel a townie for no reason shoot a townie with the same reasoning you tunneled the townie for genius. For no reason? So you view someone posting shit with 0 reasoning behind it then making up bullshit reasons for said previous shit, then saying "luls jk guys none of it was legit" is no reason? Jesus christ. I don't see how it makes him scum. How does it make him scum BC? How does it make him town? Why do you want someone who is town playing like this? Please, enlighten me as to how what he did should be acceptable town play. See that's what I'm saying. You can't even explain why he would be scum. You're shooting him for being "anti-town" which like THE most easy and convenient excuse for scum because you don't need to explain a false scumread, which also means you won't be wrong, so you can pretend to be smart while blatantly shooting townies. as much as I hate using it as an example go look at LXI. I as town, actively pushed people who were actively anti town. Why? Because I thought they were scum for it. I recognize day 1 skater could easily be a douchebag trolly town. However I am sick of dealing with players like that in games and finally have a gun to at least remove one cancer from the game. why are you trying to play like in LXI? (need i remind you of the outcome?) You could be trying to improve instead of repeating the same old mistakes, and you not doing so has a clear motivation as mafia since it's ez town meta to mold yourself into As town, the explanation is basically that you are unwilling to learn from your mistakes. Do you want me to think that of you? Cuz it seems like you do. unwilling to learn? I am actively fixing the solution before it can cause serious problems for the town. That shows learning to me. I am not saying LXI is my best game ever as its obviously not. I fucked up there. However I have currently done something I view will stop that potential situation from happening again. It was also a rash decision out of insane annoyance but one I would do with a clear head as well.
Yes, you are still trying to kill town over mafia.
To win as town, you should kill mafia. not town. Y'know.
Cuz, cuz, if you kill all mafia right away, you never get anywhere near lylo. y'know.
So that's actually how you would win games.
Instead you're getting us closer to lylo.
|
On June 23 2013 05:45 kitaman27 wrote:
Right now I think it's more likely that BC is a trigger happy town that shot judge for policy, than a mafia scum who is trying to get away with an easy shot. Like I mentioned before, a scum day vig that doesn't have to post in the thread to pull off the shot can just shoot a high priority target anonymously and get away with it at no cost. If what BC says is true, he wouldn't even have to worry about another townie knowing his role was responsible for the shot because he created it himself. I'm not sure what he would have to gain claiming responsibility for the shot in the thread as mafia, other than having the opportunity to yell at a bunch of people and shift focus to himself, but that's not really worth it this early in the game.
how do you know he doesn't have to post in the thread?
|
hosts totally afk the shot is real guys
|
On June 23 2013 05:50 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:48 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:45 kitaman27 wrote:
Right now I think it's more likely that BC is a trigger happy town that shot judge for policy, than a mafia scum who is trying to get away with an easy shot. Like I mentioned before, a scum day vig that doesn't have to post in the thread to pull off the shot can just shoot a high priority target anonymously and get away with it at no cost. If what BC says is true, he wouldn't even have to worry about another townie knowing his role was responsible for the shot because he created it himself. I'm not sure what he would have to gain claiming responsibility for the shot in the thread as mafia, other than having the opportunity to yell at a bunch of people and shift focus to himself, but that's not really worth it this early in the game. how do you know he doesn't have to post in the thread? Because he didn't?
you must have missed where he claimed the fake shot which may as well have been a requirement for the fake shot
too bad it was fake
|
On June 23 2013 05:52 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:50 Dandel Ion wrote:
hosts totally afk the shot is real guys Posted 1 minute after the vote count. GG. Shot probably fake, or failed for some other reason. Which is weird, because both BC and sk8r seem convinced it had no reason to fail. Sk8r! Are you bulletproof?
I was being sarcastic because there was a votecount and a distinct lack of dead people......
|
On June 23 2013 05:57 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:54 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 05:45 kitaman27 wrote:
Right now I think it's more likely that BC is a trigger happy town that shot judge for policy, than a mafia scum who is trying to get away with an easy shot. Like I mentioned before, a scum day vig that doesn't have to post in the thread to pull off the shot can just shoot a high priority target anonymously and get away with it at no cost. If what BC says is true, he wouldn't even have to worry about another townie knowing his role was responsible for the shot because he created it himself. I'm not sure what he would have to gain claiming responsibility for the shot in the thread as mafia, other than having the opportunity to yell at a bunch of people and shift focus to himself, but that's not really worth it this early in the game. I don't like this post, kita. You worry me. You don't consider the fact at all that he did this knowing that one of his scumteam created the role or something? The real reasoning behind what BC did with the little information we got is very easy to obfuscate and you only consider the towny implications. And as someone just mentioned, how do you know he didn't have to post what he did about jack the ripper in the thread? BC's most recent post regarding Palmar has placated me somewhat because if anyone is capable of this kind of play I'd believe it to be BC; it's the timing of the shot that just really bothers me. The 'shoot first, ask questions later' is not in anyway indicative of a towny mindset no matter how angry you are. There are many things BC could have done that I've argued would have been more effective, especially if it means wasting a vig shot on a towny that could have been effective later on. Except that BC is exactly the kind of person who would shoot first and ask questions later. I was all up in Adam's face in Duel mafia and even accused him of being 3P for most of the game because I thought he wasn't the shoot first, ask questions later kinda guy. Turned out he was. As town. As for him not being afraid of the role creator: well duh. He claims he created the role himself. And that part I absolutely believe.
why
|
On June 23 2013 06:17 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2013 05:58 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 23 2013 05:57 Acrofales wrote:On June 23 2013 05:54 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 23 2013 05:45 kitaman27 wrote:
Right now I think it's more likely that BC is a trigger happy town that shot judge for policy, than a mafia scum who is trying to get away with an easy shot. Like I mentioned before, a scum day vig that doesn't have to post in the thread to pull off the shot can just shoot a high priority target anonymously and get away with it at no cost. If what BC says is true, he wouldn't even have to worry about another townie knowing his role was responsible for the shot because he created it himself. I'm not sure what he would have to gain claiming responsibility for the shot in the thread as mafia, other than having the opportunity to yell at a bunch of people and shift focus to himself, but that's not really worth it this early in the game. I don't like this post, kita. You worry me. You don't consider the fact at all that he did this knowing that one of his scumteam created the role or something? The real reasoning behind what BC did with the little information we got is very easy to obfuscate and you only consider the towny implications. And as someone just mentioned, how do you know he didn't have to post what he did about jack the ripper in the thread? BC's most recent post regarding Palmar has placated me somewhat because if anyone is capable of this kind of play I'd believe it to be BC; it's the timing of the shot that just really bothers me. The 'shoot first, ask questions later' is not in anyway indicative of a towny mindset no matter how angry you are. There are many things BC could have done that I've argued would have been more effective, especially if it means wasting a vig shot on a towny that could have been effective later on. Except that BC is exactly the kind of person who would shoot first and ask questions later. I was all up in Adam's face in Duel mafia and even accused him of being 3P for most of the game because I thought he wasn't the shoot first, ask questions later kinda guy. Turned out he was. As town. As for him not being afraid of the role creator: well duh. He claims he created the role himself. And that part I absolutely believe. why Because of all the arguments you could make against my plan, BC came up with a very oddball one... unless he did actually create his own role. Are you actually reading the thread? I posted that exact same reasoning about 30 minutes ago...
no why are you dismissing the possiblilty a scumbuddy made his role, also making it possible to claim w/e you want
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
