/obs
mafia takes a lot of time and is stressful...i need to relax for a while... insert random revealing info that is related to fatties...
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
/obs mafia takes a lot of time and is stressful...i need to relax for a while... insert random revealing info that is related to fatties... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
/obs rl yeah... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
kool | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
I sheep calgar's opinion about activity. I hate lurkers too as a terran player, i hate when a lurker spine rips my ass, so i may kill you if you are missing. still it's quite early, so yeah. @calgar, hi how are you? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
trix is very evil and gives diarrhea if you eat too fast or too much. good gf choice wheaties are just stronk and good 3p killer it may have been funnier with the cereal mascots considering they are so schizophenic, coco puffs bird, tony the tiger, cookie crisp wolf. /spam so bored, post town, post........... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
well i'll show you again that i am town with fearless lynching and analysis, i am not afraid. delicious cereal shall be safeguarded today! rejoice. @jrkirby what do you think about the lynch all lurkers policy? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 04 2013 12:20 eSpi.Casey wrote: Hi everyone, looking forward to play with all of you. I will try to be as active as possible, and i hope everyone else will try aswell, even though im from Norway and following CET timezone i will try to contribute with good/analytic post as the game goes on Show nested quote + I absolutley agree with thisOn May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. seems like a sheep casey, i realize this may be your first game, but do not just say agree or disagree, try to back it up with your thought process or etc so that people can get better reads. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:22 jrkirby wrote: Well sugarfluff has stopped lurking, so the votes on him are kinda pointless. As targe pointed out, flowcaster is lurking, and also I notice shirokami is lurking, but he try to give an excuse at least. @jrkirby, what do you think of sugarfluff's posting so far? On May 04 2013 17:14 Sugarfluff wrote: Yes! Awesome feeling, waking up and knowing the PM is in my inbox! Less awesome to have some votes. ^^ Anyway, I was going to throw my vote right back at nobodywonder, but I feel VayneAuthority is slightly suspicious. Wrong lynching is obviously bad but mafia can use the extra, safe time to more effect I think. Time to get breakfast and ponder. @sugarfluff, who are your scumreads then? who are you thinking of voting? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:34 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 04 2013 15:08 jampidampi wrote: Yes, rolled town again. On May 04 2013 12:38 VayneAuthority wrote: this will be rough considering it is a no clue game. First day of lynching is just purely a guess at this point, ill probably get the ball rolling later once I see some more posts Why post something like this instead of trying to create discussion? On May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey all, looking forward to a fun game. I agree with the general notion that lurking should be dissuaded and active posting should be encouraged. However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. Like this post of yours? I'm not sold on policy lynching. If we agree to policy lynch, it creates an easy way for scum to mask themselves in the town. And if we agree on a policy, scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker. What I suggest is leaving lurkers for our blues to handle. Scummy lurkers are shot by vigis, null lurkers are checked by cops, towny lurkers are not are a big concern. what exactly was there to discuss 3 posts in? This is how I always play, I only will be convinced after the first day in a no clue game. If you guys don't like how I play then I guess I wont be in this game very long, pretty much all there is to it. or you can change your play and not die...this is highly recommended if you are town. you almost deserve to die if you don't contribute | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:36 VayneAuthority wrote: So far all I can tell is that this is either going to be an easy mafia victory or the mafia is giving themselves away on the first day and are indeed newbies. Guess we will find out soon enough. this seems to ominous, I really dislike your mindset vayne. in the shitstorm of mafia XL that I was part of, town rallied after a couple of retarded lynches and plays (i myself am guilty). i just can't help but feel that you are kinda making excuses for not contributing. you are too early to call things, anyways you can work through filters and pages...again highly recommended as town | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 02:40 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 05 2013 02:37 nobodywonder wrote: On May 05 2013 02:34 VayneAuthority wrote: On May 04 2013 15:08 jampidampi wrote: Yes, rolled town again. On May 04 2013 12:38 VayneAuthority wrote: this will be rough considering it is a no clue game. First day of lynching is just purely a guess at this point, ill probably get the ball rolling later once I see some more posts Why post something like this instead of trying to create discussion? On May 04 2013 12:10 Spicydinosaur wrote: Hey all, looking forward to a fun game. I agree with the general notion that lurking should be dissuaded and active posting should be encouraged. However I'd like to add that we should be on the lookout for postings that simply mask for scum, those that add little to the discussion but give the illusion of participation. Like this post of yours? I'm not sold on policy lynching. If we agree to policy lynch, it creates an easy way for scum to mask themselves in the town. And if we agree on a policy, scum can just avoid doing whatever we policy lynch for. Like just posting a bit more than the lurkiest lurker. What I suggest is leaving lurkers for our blues to handle. Scummy lurkers are shot by vigis, null lurkers are checked by cops, towny lurkers are not are a big concern. what exactly was there to discuss 3 posts in? This is how I always play, I only will be convinced after the first day in a no clue game. If you guys don't like how I play then I guess I wont be in this game very long, pretty much all there is to it. or you can change your play and not die...this is highly recommended if you are town. you almost deserve to die if you don't contribute Showing up town and lynching the bandwagoners is enough of a contribution if it comes to that. Im used to being lynched day 1 since mafia fear logic and not emotional people. no, it's not. you need to contribute. for example, here's a bone for you what do you think of sugarfluff's suscipion of you? what do you think of jampi's vt claim? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
besides, if you want to argue logic, derp herrrrr emotions are a hint on how to people think still. if you want to be logical, you have to take emotions into account. anyways no more excuses. and why so suicidal? i'd be happy to oblige you though. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
@vayne link us your old games plz. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 06:20 Spicydinosaur wrote: @nobodywonder, I am curious as to why you put a vote on VayneAuthority. All the votes up to this point have been basically to get lurkers to post. Is your vote on him because of suspicion, an attempt to motivate him in some way, or another purpose? I am really annoyed by his day 1 logic thing. And as for the votes, not many people have voted so yeah... I vote him because I'm just annoyed, the action can be scummy, but his response I can't quite make a read...I'll clarify when he does this: On May 05 2013 06:30 VayneAuthority wrote: Based on my analysis I will be voting for Targe. Heading out for a while so ill be back later. Interesting, you voted, but why? Please explain your logic or whatever you cling to. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 05 2013 03:35 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On May 05 2013 02:36 nobodywonder wrote: On May 05 2013 02:22 jrkirby wrote: Well sugarfluff has stopped lurking, so the votes on him are kinda pointless. As targe pointed out, flowcaster is lurking, and also I notice shirokami is lurking, but he try to give an excuse at least. @jrkirby, what do you think of sugarfluff's posting so far? Nothing particularly suspicious yet. cool cool, let us know when you see anyone suspicious. your reads were pretty good last game, so I look forward to your posts. whats your read on me, jampi, vayne, the more activce posters? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
also @spicydinosaur, don't vote flowcaster for now because at this point he may be replaced or something. why don't you be productive and give an opinion on the active players right now. i just looked at your filter, shirokami. your filter is terrible. you post but never contribute anything besides saying my phone is terrible for typing and i'll get back to you in a while. On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game. Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard. I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing. Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. On May 05 2013 18:06 shirokami wrote: @spicy My phone corrects my punctuation so my posts will not lack in that manner, the hard part is to quote and paste things. My punctuation will go worse when I have no autocorrect anymore I'm traveling as I write back to home, still many kilometers to go but hey I will post something big after I get back home. I'm sorry for not been posting anything with content. One thing is I like jarjars posts. Will tell you later why. On May 05 2013 18:25 shirokami wrote: About 8 hours. You may have a legitimate reason with the phone thing, but seriously delaying contribution and analysis is hugely detrimental to town. I understand you can't quote stuff, but you can still give analysis of Jarjar's post somewhat. I didn't find Jarjar's posting that great... | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
why didn't you vote for shirokami? why vote for flowcaster? On May 05 2013 11:50 Spicydinosaur wrote: shirokami is troubling me greatly. Aside from the lack of content in his posts, the only things the posts say are that he is postponing his analysis/discussion. Show nested quote + On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game. Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. Show nested quote + On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard. I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing. Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. He claims his phone is only good for writing, yet his punctuation doesn't that bad. This feels like it comes off as a stall tactic which is not helpful at all. Even if it might be difficult to type, he should have at least posted something beneficial. Perhaps when his "analysis" comes, my mind will change, but for now, he's close to the top of my list. On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
If Targe is scum, then I don't see why wouldn't you just make a case and show us. Vayne, your play just doesn't make sense. I actually have a couple of concerns about Targe's play too, so if you give us the analysis then that would be great. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 06 2013 03:04 Targe wrote: Show nested quote + On May 06 2013 03:00 nobodywonder wrote: @ spicydinosaur why didn't you vote for shirokami? why vote for flowcaster? On May 05 2013 11:50 Spicydinosaur wrote: shirokami is troubling me greatly. Aside from the lack of content in his posts, the only things the posts say are that he is postponing his analysis/discussion. On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game. Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo. So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard. I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing. Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. He claims his phone is only good for writing, yet his punctuation doesn't that bad. This feels like it comes off as a stall tactic which is not helpful at all. Even if it might be difficult to type, he should have at least posted something beneficial. Perhaps when his "analysis" comes, my mind will change, but for now, he's close to the top of my list. On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. I'm going to be changing my vote from flowmaster, he hasn't posted once so is going to be modkilled and replaced. why jarjar? explain. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 06 2013 05:05 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 06 2013 03:09 nobodywonder wrote: @Vayne, just tell us why you vote Targe? Targe's posting doesn't seem particularly bad. At this point, Targe isn't even going to be lynched...in that case, will you tell us tomorrow? Or just hold it forever? In the end you should TELL US TODAY, otherwise I'm definitely saying you are scum. If Targe is scum, then I don't see why wouldn't you just make a case and show us. Vayne, your play just doesn't make sense. I actually have a couple of concerns about Targe's play too, so if you give us the analysis then that would be great. shrug, just some brief pickups from him being too agreeable and deciding early on whether people are acting "scummy" or not. Also his push for lynching lurkers is something mafia tend to do early to gain an early foothold and town usually goes along with it, a common rookie mistake. I would rather just no lynch this day as theres almost nothing to go off of, but if I have to vote for now its going to be him Not going to reveal the second part of my analysis just yet because I would like to see where this first lynching goes before I divulge any more of how I think because it could change the mafia playstyle. Wow, are you serious considering about a no-lynch? How is that going to help town? How would you get your logic deductions if there's nothing to go on? Are you serious about not revealing the second part of the analysis? I don't see why you don't. Sigh I know I'm berating the same things over and over again, but I am just annoyed by your play. You seem scummy, but I have a feeling you are just a slightly weird town... @shirokami i like your activity since you're back. keep it up. As for the metagaming, I don't like jrkirby and Jarjar. In the last game, jrkirby was a great town with good reads, this game he has been very lurky. Also in the last game, Jarjar did the same thing, tunneling a single town. In this game, Jarjar is tunneling jampi, who I have a town read so far in this game. So since I am not confident about Vayne today, my gut tells me that he may just be a silly town. For today, I think that Jarjar is most suspicious and I'm going to vote him. Honestly I just feel that so many people are scummy. I am looking at basically all of you guys but especially jrkirby, jarjar, sugarfluff. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 06 2013 05:05 VayneAuthority wrote: Show nested quote + On May 06 2013 03:09 nobodywonder wrote: @Vayne, just tell us why you vote Targe? Targe's posting doesn't seem particularly bad. At this point, Targe isn't even going to be lynched...in that case, will you tell us tomorrow? Or just hold it forever? In the end you should TELL US TODAY, otherwise I'm definitely saying you are scum. If Targe is scum, then I don't see why wouldn't you just make a case and show us. Vayne, your play just doesn't make sense. I actually have a couple of concerns about Targe's play too, so if you give us the analysis then that would be great. shrug, just some brief pickups from him being too agreeable and deciding early on whether people are acting "scummy" or not. Also his push for lynching lurkers is something mafia tend to do early to gain an early foothold and town usually goes along with it, a common rookie mistake. I would rather just no lynch this day as theres almost nothing to go off of, but if I have to vote for now its going to be him Not going to reveal the second part of my analysis just yet because I would like to see where this first lynching goes before I divulge any more of how I think because it could change the mafia playstyle. From your analysis, I don't see how Targe is quite scum, but rather more like a questionable town with scummy actions. Vayne, you're going to have to work a lot harder today or tomorrow with your analysis if you want to live. Okay, so besides Targe, who is suscipious to you or bothers you? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
CHANGE IT NOW... WORK HARDER | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
DO NOT VOTE FLOWCASTER if you do you are either a stupid town or scum. neither of which is good. DO NOT DO THIS. at this point, Flowcaster may be modkilled, or replaced and I do not see the purpose of killing a lurker at this point. What fucking information does it give us? Nothing. again, do not vote flowcaster. give analysis of the actives or somewhat actives and vote. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
or at least talk to me casey. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
i look forward to reading analysis from you. any analysis is fine. don't worry about how accurate it may be. don't be afraid to be wrong. just get it out and i'll help analyze the ideas and we can discuss. as for voting @spicydino change your from flowcaster and vote someone else @jrkirby vote dammnit @flowcaster are you alive? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 06 2013 03:55 kitaman27 wrote: FloWcaster has been warned for inactivity. They will be replaced at the end of the cycle if they do not reply. 7 hours remain in the cycle. On May 06 2013 05:37 nobodywonder wrote: NOOOO, casey! don't vote Flowcaster, it's the easy way out. This is really scummy. CHANGE IT NOW... WORK HARDER On May 06 2013 05:39 nobodywonder wrote: as a public service announcement: DO NOT VOTE FLOWCASTER if you do you are either a stupid town or scum. neither of which is good. DO NOT DO THIS. at this point, Flowcaster may be modkilled, or replaced and I do not see the purpose of killing a lurker at this point. What fucking information does it give us? Nothing. again, do not vote flowcaster. give analysis of the actives or somewhat actives and vote. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
many of you guys are looking very scummy. be more active plz, jrkirby and flowcaster change your votes, casey and spicy and dont you dare switch to flowcaster, calgar or try to convince anyone to do so. it is stupid. we are here to kill scum, and we dont always have to follow the rules | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
Jarjar's logic and wording is fine, it makes more sense than others, but I'm concerned about his tunneling of jampi, which I find strange and does fit his meta. The thing is why can't jarjar extend his reasoning to others? as for vayne, I definitely agree he is very scummy, but for now I'm more inclined to believe he is just a very very weird town. If at any point, his activity decreases or becomes even more scummy, I'd gladly lynch him. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
| ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 06 2013 13:30 jampidampi wrote: jrkirby, can provide more reasons for nobodywonder being scum? Your analysis on him being scum hinges on shirokami and Espi.Casey being scum. Don't associate before the flip. gtg, please let there be meaninful posts when I come back. I dont like them either. jrkirby why am I your top scumread? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 07 2013 03:23 VayneAuthority wrote: [/url]Show nested quote + On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote: Hey! I'm highly suspicious of Spicydinosaur. His play seems calculated, coasting his vote on the guy who hasn't posted at all for 2/3 of Day 1 so he doesn't have to explain himself much when hopping on a wagon close to deadline. And the way his vote wound up on flowcaster is also "troubling". See his filter, in posts #3 and #4 he's asking questions which I would interpret as townie but then it's like he doesn't even care about them at all. His # 5 is this: On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. What happened to his inquiries regarding nobodywonder's reason to vote Vayne.. or shirokami's lack of content and postponing analysis? Does he find them satisfying or scummy or what, he simply votes for pressuring the non-poster instead of pursuing his suspicions, letting people know where he stands.. they must've given him some impression but my hunch is he's not willing to share them because he wants to keep his options of jumping on their wagon open. His catch-up post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18508502]#6 does not give the impression as if he's interested to find things out. There's something about the way he starts his posts, look: On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: It seems at this point that flowcaster is going to be replaced so my vote for him is pointless and im going to change it. For the following reasons i am voting for Targe. I had suspected shirokami because of his lack of posts, but once he got on he was talkative and gave his opinion. First off he's like warming up to it by saying his vote on flowcaster is useless. This is either townie realizing he has been playing anti-town or apologetic, cheeky scum. I can't tell but judging by the way he says these are the reasons for voting for Targe .. i don't know, sounds like it's hard for him to do so and he's getting ready to write some fiction. I mean since scum talk in their QT about who's mislynch to push I feel like this is a coordinated move in that they decided that Targe should be Spicydinosaur's target but he seems like he's working hard to come up with reasons. But the next sentence is where I think he gave himself away: On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I had suspected shirokami because of his lack of posts, but once he got on he was talkative and gave his opinion. As I've said he probably kept his options open to jump on one of the two he has questioned, actually, the only 2 people he had any sort of interactions with and even with these folks he didn't bother to comment on their replies to his questions. So here we see him choosing one of these options. The way the post is designed it's really rather sincere, like saying I was coasting so now I'm voting for one of the two guys I have a few sentences of content against, being extra careful because voting for anyone else would raise questions and scum/I don't like to explain myself. On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I'll be on till vote time if anything needs help understanding. Understanding what? It's not like he left room for anything to misinterpret, he's scum and it's that simple. Others are concerned about switching the vote because JarJar doesn't seem scummy whereas he is concerned about people understanding his post. In fact I thought him and flowcaster where the scumteam and he used the inactivity of his scumbuddy to distance himself from him knowing well that if he fails to show up he'd get replaced, or that he could easily switch off him once he starts to post. That is not the case though. I'm town and you should sheep me on this one. I'll go over other people's filters shortly. My general impression is that jrkirby, nobodywonder, Targe and jampidampi are town. Also LAL means Lynch All Liars afaik. And lurkers aren't people who don't post at all but people who post little with little to no original content .. like Spicy. I will come out and say at the least incase I die tonight that I agree a lot with this analysis. Targe and spicydinosaur are 2 of my prime suspects, also wary of espi.casey. if you think you are going to die, you might as well give us the dirt on Targe. I don't see the point of delaying your analysis any further. what do you think of the other posters, any that take your attention? what do you think of hydra's case on dino? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
On May 07 2013 01:16 Spicydinosaur wrote: @AllhailHydraGod, your analysis is completely off base. Show nested quote + On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote: What happened to his inquiries regarding nobodywonder's reason to vote Vayne.. or shirokami's lack of content and postponing analysis? Does he find them satisfying or scummy or what, he simply votes for pressuring the non-poster instead of pursuing his suspicions, letting people know where he stands.. they must've given him some impression but my hunch is he's not willing to share them because he wants to keep his options of jumping on their wagon open. I found nobodywonder's quite bland, though it was early in the day. Nobody basically said he just didnt like Vayne's play style. As for shirokami, he finally started posting and it was about vayne. He didnt like vayne's play style either because vayne refused to reveal his full analysis. Instead of addressing both of these statements separately i commented on the subject of both... ie Vayne's lack of transparency. Show nested quote + On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: His unwillingness to complete reveal is troubling but he has given some analysis. If this trend continues into day 2 then i would be more inclined to vote him. It frankly didnt seem necessary to address both nobodywonder's and shirokami's posts separately as it would simply be repeating myself. Next you focused heavily on my voting for flowcaster and then my subsequent vote change. Show nested quote + On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote: First off he's like warming up to it by saying his vote on flowcaster is useless. This is either townie realizing he has been playing anti-town or apologetic, cheeky scum. I can't tell but judging by the way he says these are the reasons for voting for Targe .. i don't know, sounds like it's hard for him to do so and he's getting ready to write some fiction. From the beginning I was open to the lynch all lurkers policy as a way to get those involved. As the day went on, I didnt find any one person overly suspicious nor had i focused on one person. I voted flowcaster because of his absolute lack of posting. Giving 0 information is not helpful at all for town. I then came back to the game, hours later things had changed. There was a mod message stating that flowcaster would either be mod killed or replaced with you. Furthermore, nobody, calgar, and targe insisted my vote change. At this point I went through posts of many of the players and come down to Targe for the reasons stated. He had only 2 votes on him when I voted him, so that can hardly be considered band wagoning. Show nested quote + On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I'll be on till vote time if anything needs help understanding. Show nested quote + On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote: Understanding what? It's not like he left room for anything to misinterpret, he's scum and it's that simple. Others are concerned about switching the vote because JarJar doesn't seem scummy whereas he is concerned about people understanding his post. In fact I thought him and flowcaster where the scumteam and he used the inactivity of his scumbuddy to distance himself from him knowing well that if he fails to show up he'd get replaced, or that he could easily switch off him once he starts to post. That is not the case though. I'm town and you should sheep me on this one. Your analysis here goes completely off the rails. I state that I am online and will talk about my position to anyone who wishes. Lets also not forget that it wasnt my vote that lynched a townie. You had a single though that Flowcaster and I were scumbuddies and you let that define your whole analysis. It is clear at the end that realized how wrong you were but you couldnt let that go. Then your very last thing you say is that people should go along with you, even when you claim im scum for bandwagoning. Show nested quote + On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote: As I've said he probably kept his options open to jump on one of the two he has questioned, actually, the only 2 people he had any sort of interactions with and even with these folks he didn't bother to comment on their replies to his questions. Here again you make assumptions that dont match the facts. I had question a few and yet I voted for another and gave my reasons for it. what are your reads on me, shirokami and vayne then? you seemed to have poked and prodded us, but what have been the results of your findings? | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
I like jampi's analysis so far, I really don't like Casey's play, but I'm especially concerned because I am not feeling his play is bad townie, but rather more like scum. I really was bothered by how he basically sidestepped me when I literally screamed at him to change his vote from flowcaster to someone else. And I don't like how it ended up with jarjar... Spoilered interaction between me and Casey for my own reading pleasure and you guys if you want. + Show Spoiler + On May 06 2013 05:36 eSpi.Casey wrote: Im trying to figure out who i should be voting for, but i find it pretty hard, i still think vayne seem`s scummy, Flowcaster seems to be replaced. I think its to little content to find a good scumread and vote for. Im tempted to vote for Vayne, but if he flip`s town we will have a total caos on day2, i put my vote on Flowcaster for now, i will be reading here before the day ends, and might change my vote from what i read and how the game evolves On May 06 2013 05:37 nobodywonder wrote: NOOOO, casey! don't vote Flowcaster, it's the easy way out. This is really scummy. CHANGE IT NOW... WORK HARDER On May 06 2013 05:42 nobodywonder wrote: casey, I assume you are here. If you try to avoid me now, you are my prime scumread. Unvote now and vote for someone else. or at least talk to me casey. On May 06 2013 05:50 eSpi.Casey wrote: Its not my final vote, as i said im tempted to vote Vayne , but i want to see how this develops the last hours, while i try read some filters and hopefully be able to place a vote a little more secure then i feel now, would be really bad if Vayne, or someone else turns town, its pretty much chaos now, and D2 would be really bad if we lynch a townnie On May 06 2013 05:55 nobodywonder wrote: ok good, thanks for responding casey. well, why don't you lay down the heat then. poke and prod vayne then, ask him questions and see how they develop and if you like them. don't be passive. i look forward to reading analysis from you. any analysis is fine. don't worry about how accurate it may be. don't be afraid to be wrong. just get it out and i'll help analyze the ideas and we can discuss. as for voting @spicydino change your from flowcaster and vote someone else @jrkirby vote dammnit @flowcaster are you alive? On May 06 2013 05:56 nobodywonder wrote: @casey, what do you think about jarjar because right now he is going to be lynched. what do you think about his behavior and his voters? On May 06 2013 06:59 nobodywonder wrote: well i gtg, gl town gl gl [B]On May 06 2013 07:37 eSpi.Casey wrote: ##Unvote : Flowcaster ##Vote : JarJarDrinks Jarjar and Vayne seems as the most scumming once for me, with jarjar as the scummiest, jarjar have barly contributed, Vayne says he will contribute, but not before D2, atleast he seems more active then jarjar, im looking forward to see what you come up with on D2 Veyne, if your still here. Tomorrow i have free from work and will spend much time analytic post/filters and try to contribute more then i have done soo far. I think maybe i should have obs`ed a game before i started playing, this was a bit harder then i expected, but il try to keep up. | ||
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
*sigh* i literally have no idea who is town... jampi was my strongest townread. i feel lost more, I hope I can figure stuff tomorrow and I'll try to post analyses. | ||
| ||
ESL Open Cup
Asia Open Cup #227
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea 19008 Dota 2Horang2 2239 EffOrt 1348 Jaedong 1228 Larva 745 BeSt 309 actioN 262 Soulkey 191 Hyuk 187 Leta 131 [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games summit1g9764 singsing1944 Liquid`RaSZi900 shoxiejesuss451 Pyrionflax444 Liquid`LucifroN369 crisheroes345 Livibee258 XaKoH 226 NuckleDu97 Mew2King90 Fuzer 55 QueenE39 Trikslyr25 Organizations Dota 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH194 StarCraft: Brood War• aXEnki • intothetv • Gussbus • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • Poblha League of Legends |
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
Club NV x Duckling Show…
Creator vs Bunny
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Solar vs DongRaeGu
NightMare vs ByuN
Online Event
StarsWar
Maru vs Spirit
ShoWTimE vs GuMiho
Firefly vs herO
Oliveira vs SKillous
Chat StarLeague
[ Show More ] H.4.0.S
Chat StarLeague
StarsWar
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Chat StarLeague
BSL
ForJumy Cup
Chat StarLeague
|
|