@Jampi

Ok, your accusal of me revolves around my vote of Jarjar. I had a poor read on him, in my eyes he was neither clearly scum or town, note the resentment in my voice when it turned out he was town, I wanted him to ideally post before I went to bed (I stayed up as late as I could as I had school the next day) but he didn't get there in time.

Casey and Spicy's votes mattered because if they kept on flowcaster there was definitely no chance of anyone but jarjar eating the lynch, had there been one or two swaps from jarjar then casey and spicy had the power to effectively lynch most people.

You say I instantly jump to the defensive on being accused yet Vayne's analysis of me clearly states that I did not react to any of his accusations. Now I would agree with Vayne's analysis here as I was going by the thinking that acting up over being accused is just going to make you appear more scummy whilst continuing as normal whilst knowing that you weren't scum would be the obvious choice of any townie, although in Vayne's analysis he states that this isn't what townies do, I probably should have read through a game or two to get an idea on that.

@Spicy

You say that my reasoning for voting jarjar can be applied to myself, so what? it doesn't make the reasoning any worse, it just means it can also apply to me.

Again people focus on my remorse for jarjar's lynch, jarjar's fate wasn't sealed when I went to bed, there were about 3 and a half hours left to go until the lynch occurred and if casey and you changed your votes as well as 1 from jarjar then anyone could have been realistically lynched.

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 07 2013 21:34 GMT

#353

@Vayne, jampidampi was clearly not radiating scum vibes, he was actively posting from the beginning, started by putting forward good points on the LAL debate, he pressures you for not releasing information as most people did, he analyses people intently, not being afraid to put his point across, basically yeah, nothing about it said scum to me so why would I not say he's town?

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 07 2013 21:36 GMT

#354

@Calgar, read the above post to hear about my opinion on jampi.

read the post before that to see what I have to say about the jarjar lynch.

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 07 2013 21:38 GMT

#355

EBWOP: I'm going to bed now, its 10:40, damn I need to get some more time in the day to actually write things down.

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 08 2013 07:31 GMT

#360

@jrkirby

To follow up from my previous post, you still haven't improved.
You've gone from a lot of one liners to hardcore lurking:

Vayne, you were talking about how a no lynch would be good, but you never did vote for one. Why?

This was your last post, you asked a question, yet when Vayne replies you do nothing with the information you gained, shirokami reacted, but not you.

Casey asks you a question about your voting, which you subsequently ignored:

You had 3 suspects, changed your vote to non of thoose 3 and ending up with no lynch. What happend to we fearing lynches and : Lynch whoever we think are scum ??

He's asking you why you changed to no lynch, you still haven't replied.

He asks later on for a reply:

Im waiting for you`r answears Jrkirby

Still no answer.

God damn it jkirby, reply, if you don't you're instantly scum in my eyes.

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 08 2013 11:15 GMT

#364

On May 07 2013 17:10 nobodywonder wrote:
wow jampi's dead and no one says anything...

*sigh* i literally have no idea who is town... jampi was my strongest townread. i feel lost more, I hope I can figure stuff tomorrow and I'll try to post analyses.

So nobodywonder, you've been awfully quiet since the jampi lynch, have anything to say now?

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 08 2013 16:49 GMT

#367

On May 08 2013 23:36 Spicydinosaur wrote:
It looks like there is an early BW against jkirby.

Casey is voting him because of his lack of postings and not answering his questions. However what is troubling is targe now throwing his suspicion on jkirby. The last thing targe wrote was this on jkirby.

Show nested quote +

This reads as a preamble to a vote and something targe will look back to for his justifications for doing so. What is really troubling is that it seems targe is representing Casey in the paragraph as almost a team. Which is weird since targe and Casey have 0 conversations together. I wouldn't go far as to say they are scum team as my read on Casey wasn't scum. What I do think is happening is that targe is scum and he's trying to pile on a town early now through someone else's problem.

Even after targe's responses, I'm still not convinced of his townness. As such for now, I'm voting Targe.

We really need everyone to talk today, especially @vanye, @nobody, @jkriby, and shirokami.

I'm simply trying to get things moving, no one is speaking today, and that's really not good, especially with voting in several hours.

Casey has started posting more since d2 began and he was the only one asking jkirby for answers so I pointed to him.

Targe

United Kingdom14103 Posts

May 08 2013 18:42 GMT

#374

On May 09 2013 03:10 shirokami wrote:
So, vayne hid his analysis for NO REASON
vayne wanted a no-lynch
vayne thought it was good that our one most active town was killed only because he is a miller
vayne is playing scummy

and you are saying he is scummy town or some shit?

really guys.. ?

Vayne's reason for withholding made sense, I was the one in question and even I can see that, getting rid of miller is a good thing, it means that any rolefinds will return true, we don't have to worry about it being true or false.

No lynch I don't agree with.

Shiro, if that's seriously your analysis for the day you need to perk up, that's poor.