|
On April 06 2013 23:25 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 23:18 DarthPunk wrote:On April 06 2013 23:16 Oatsmaster wrote:Im back. Damn that was a long day. DP feels like personality DP and not town DP(whatever game) Iamp feels like town IAMP I SAID THAT ALREADY NOW SHEEP ME. + Show Spoiler + This is entirely unacceptable. This is basically uhuh DP. Hypocrite.
No. That is not good enough. You can't just give reads because you 'feel' something with no backup. That is unacceptable. You cannot give town reads because you 'feel' something that is entirely unacceptable. And now you are repeating something that obviously provoked me and caused me to trash the thread a bit beforehand.
Now I am really wondering what it is that you have done, and why it makes you town. And reading your filter I really can't see anything.
|
On April 06 2013 23:32 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 23:29 DarthPunk wrote:On April 06 2013 23:25 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 06 2013 23:18 DarthPunk wrote:On April 06 2013 23:16 Oatsmaster wrote:Im back. Damn that was a long day. DP feels like personality DP and not town DP(whatever game) Iamp feels like town IAMP I SAID THAT ALREADY NOW SHEEP ME. + Show Spoiler + This is entirely unacceptable. This is basically uhuh DP. Hypocrite. No. That is not good enough. You can't just give reads because you 'feel' something with no backup. That is unacceptable. You cannot give town reads because you 'feel' something that is entirely unacceptable. And now you are repeating something that obviously provoked me and caused me to trash the thread a bit beforehand. Now I am really wondering what it is that you have done, and why it makes you town. And reading your filter I really can't see anything. Um I can give reads. But im not pushing them you see. I am creating a discussion point. You are taking this EXTREMELY seriously. Why? Also why did you wait for me to respond before posting this more logical piece instead of posting it earlier, rather than 'BULLSHIT I SAY, BULLSHIT'
Because I didn't think I would have to explain to you why it was unacceptable. Obviously I did.
So you are giving out useless reads with no meaning behind them and no information for town and then not pushing them.
Cool story bro.
|
I don't like oates this game. Apart from the trolling/shit posts in his filter most of his contributions come from an extremely wishy-washy IAMP read.
Part 1: The Iamp mess.
On April 05 2013 19:19 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 17:58 Palmar wrote: what do you think of sciberbia and iamperfection Oats?
Iamp is being useless and his spam was contained in a very short period of time. Probably due to time constrains and sleep though. Feels like town Iamp especially with irritation with rayn for being an idiot. AFAIK he hasnt rolled scum in forever so I dont see meta as being very useful. So marv is basically useless in this case.
Here is the beginning of his entirely odd read of IAMP. He is scummy trait one and two but probably town.
On April 05 2013 21:58 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 21:56 iamperfection wrote: i would kill all lurkers everywhere ever if i could. just saying. Every game(mini) Ive seen someone say this, they are scum. #justsaying
Here he is scum potentially
On April 05 2013 22:00 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 21:59 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 21:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 05 2013 21:50 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 05 2013 21:42 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 20:27 marvellosity wrote:On April 05 2013 17:21 Palmar wrote: Alright time to see what's going on in the thread.
@marv: on a scale of 1-10 how certain are you that I'm town?
@Oats: go yell at someone please. I have a slight townread on you, dunno how that translates into 1-10. Looks like I'm not gonna get Ace lynched today... *serious hat* ##Unvote why does it look like ace isnt get lynched? what has he done to make you think he is not scum? Why are you being passive? Why are you not pushing for what you want? why am i forced to ask these questions? are you scum? Reads? Or is Ace your scum read for being Ace? does nobody read my fucking posts i said ace is scum because he bothered to chime in but has no scum hunted or added to the discussion at all. Lazy marv is scum marv if he isn't trying to get what he wants he looks scum to me. Chill out mr grumpy pants What is different about Ace's town games in this game Iamp? im not going to entertain a meta argument for what ace has done. - Pointless filler posts that add nothing to the discussion - no posts that look like they are trying to figure out other peoples alignments - general lurking if that's not scum motivated i dont know what is. Again you do this too sometimes and you arent scum when you do this. CONVINCE ME.
Then he asks IAMP his previous town then scum read to convince him he is town.
On April 05 2013 22:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:01 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 22:00 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 05 2013 21:59 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 21:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 05 2013 21:50 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 05 2013 21:42 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 20:27 marvellosity wrote:On April 05 2013 17:21 Palmar wrote: Alright time to see what's going on in the thread.
@marv: on a scale of 1-10 how certain are you that I'm town?
@Oats: go yell at someone please. I have a slight townread on you, dunno how that translates into 1-10. Looks like I'm not gonna get Ace lynched today... *serious hat* ##Unvote why does it look like ace isnt get lynched? what has he done to make you think he is not scum? Why are you being passive? Why are you not pushing for what you want? why am i forced to ask these questions? are you scum? Reads? Or is Ace your scum read for being Ace? does nobody read my fucking posts i said ace is scum because he bothered to chime in but has no scum hunted or added to the discussion at all. Lazy marv is scum marv if he isn't trying to get what he wants he looks scum to me. Chill out mr grumpy pants What is different about Ace's town games in this game Iamp? im not going to entertain a meta argument for what ace has done. - Pointless filler posts that add nothing to the discussion - no posts that look like they are trying to figure out other peoples alignments - general lurking if that's not scum motivated i dont know what is. Again you do this too sometimes and you arent scum when you do this. CONVINCE ME. wtf are you looking for you don't need a super long case to see why ace is scum. how about my old standby he does not give a shit about town. that good enough Damn. I was hoping for a paragraph out of you. Its like bigfoot. Rumored to exist but NEVER BEEN SEEN.
Another dig at Iamperfection who he has most recently called scum and whom Oats is waiting to be convinced on.
On April 05 2013 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:12 Palmar wrote: marv was lazy as town last time I played with him, are you just trying to lynch anyone?
##vote iamperfection what the hell palmar. WHAT IN THE WORLD DO YOU SEE IN IAMPS PLAY THAT MAKES HIM SCUM AND NOT how iamp normally is?
And here is the gold. 'What the hell palmar' screams oates in all caps. Why are you voting for obviously town IAMP despite my previous read being scum rather than town.
On April 05 2013 22:51 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:50 iamperfection wrote:On April 05 2013 22:48 marvellosity wrote: Why don't you tell me why you're pushing a vet who's known to do jack shit on Day 1 in every game ever? Given you're so keen to swing the meta club at me, after all. quicker people stop being useless the better don't care what their name is. You dont use meta or you do use meta? It cant be one or the other. Ace you said is scummy FUCK META Marv you said is scummy CAUSE META. WHICH IS IT?
and then back to attacking IAMP and his arguments despite typing in all caps that Iamp was townie to plamar.
Part 2: The non push on sciberbia.
Oats has made one case all game. It was made after he was asked to look into this person and it consists of this.
On April 05 2013 19:24 Oatsmaster wrote:He starts with random setup speculation with a really really fucking obvious answer if he even followed vaguely any instant majority lynch game. Yeah all setup speculation and trying to justify his argument, 'to start discussion' YEAH you dont do that with such a bad question. It looked like a setup and for him to look active with easy stuff to post. Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 09:39 sciberbia wrote:On April 05 2013 09:33 marvellosity wrote: I'm somewhat concerned that Palmar gave a serious reason for not wanting to vote Ace. I don't follow your logic. You think Palmar is scum because he isn't trolling? On April 05 2013 09:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 09:33 marvellosity wrote: I'm somewhat concerned that Palmar gave a serious reason for not wanting to vote Ace. Wanna kill WoS? Why are you not concerned into this matter rather than Palmar/Ace? Why don't you explain why you want to kill WoS.. Yeah sniping marv and asking really 'snipy' questions. Feeling off right now, leaning scum on him ##Vote: Sci
This is the worst case in the world for day three or day two or any day that is not day one.
He is voting him based on sciberbia speculating setup at the beginning of the game
That would be fine if that was a start of game discussion vote or whatever but it is not. And this one 'cases' has been clung to for the rest of the day by oats.
although his vote has been parked there since that time he has not pushed his lynch or provided anything at all to add to this shitty start of game 'case'
In fact. He doersn;t even MENTION sciberbia again until Iamp asks him.
On April 06 2013 00:03 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 23:58 iamperfection wrote: just for clarification what are your reads oats.. Scum on Sci i have townreads I dont want to disclose.
On April 06 2013 00:45 Oatsmaster wrote: Read on Sciberia everybody? Why do you not want to lynch him everyone who doesnt want to lynch him?
He is hanging on to his shitty day one case and not providing anything to back it up.
When marv correctly asks WHY? we want to lynch sciberbia. He copy pastes the same shitty day one case.
On April 06 2013 01:22 Oatsmaster wrote:By your command Marv. This is why I want to lynch scib Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 19:24 Oatsmaster wrote:EBWOP: Forgot to put in Sci Read his filter now He starts with random setup speculation with a really really fucking obvious answer if he even followed vaguely any instant majority lynch game. Yeah all setup speculation and trying to justify his argument, 'to start discussion' YEAH you dont do that with such a bad question. It looked like a setup and for him to look active with easy stuff to post. On April 05 2013 09:39 sciberbia wrote:On April 05 2013 09:33 marvellosity wrote: I'm somewhat concerned that Palmar gave a serious reason for not wanting to vote Ace. I don't follow your logic. You think Palmar is scum because he isn't trolling? On April 05 2013 09:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 05 2013 09:33 marvellosity wrote: I'm somewhat concerned that Palmar gave a serious reason for not wanting to vote Ace. Wanna kill WoS? Why are you not concerned into this matter rather than Palmar/Ace? Why don't you explain why you want to kill WoS.. Yeah sniping marv and asking really 'snipy' questions. Feeling off right now, leaning scum on him ##Vote: SciSo Palmar any initial reads?
He has yet to give any compelling reasons or arguments for town to lynch sciberbia and has relied on a day one case based on a pressure vote as his case to sit on all game. DESPITE being somewhat active he has done little to push his lynch unless prompted. Any other mention of sciberbia is a throwaway line and he DOES NOT PUSH AT ALL OR FURTHER HIS NUMBER ONE SCUM READ AND VOTE OF THE ENTIRE GAME.
Oats is scum. Discuss.
|
On April 06 2013 23:37 marvellosity wrote:I think I might start enacting this policy:
Whatever dude. I am actually trying and my posts are not idiotic like you are making them out to be. So quit it please.
|
On April 07 2013 00:02 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 23:59 DarthPunk wrote:On April 06 2013 23:37 marvellosity wrote:I think I might start enacting this policy: On April 06 2013 00:20 Palmar wrote: honestly:
DP: NOT READING YOUR POSTS LOL
Whatever dude. I am actually trying and my posts are not idiotic like you are making them out to be. So quit it please. Do you have any reads other than Iamp?Can you answer my question on Iamp please? (Im asking nicely this time, next time maybe not)
Lol read the case that is 3 posts up from this one. Or are you just trying to ignore it?
Oh and the reason I wanted to lynch Perfection today is because he was being a jerk. And I could not see a town reason to be such a jerk. But mainly because I was upset at him. That was pretty obvious.
|
Unvote: Iamperfection
Vote: Oatsmaster
|
On April 07 2013 00:09 Tunkeg wrote: DarthPunk since you are here, what is your view on WoS and sci?
I just read their filters. Don't want to lynch sci at all today, and I would rather allow WoS some time to develop his filter a bit more before we lynch him off the tiny amount of posting he has done so far. WoS is a straight up lurker lynch IMO. If we are going to lynch a lurker I want to lynch Axle. Axle has been known to post A LOT almost always. If we lynch a lurker I would be most comfortable on him for meta reasons. That being said I suggest we take as much time as we need to give lurkers the opportunity to contribute.
The lynch mechanics allow longer days which favor town so there is no need to be hasty and lynch a lurker.
I would much rather lynch oats. Please read my case on him carefully and give your thoughts.
|
On April 07 2013 00:14 Oatsmaster wrote: oh the frustration?
I dont know, again, this seems similar to personality 2 where he had a shitfest with Marv.
Guess what? He was scum there.
You have no fucking idea about how to read me with meta. and if marv get's it wrong multiple times I doubt you, who have played like one game with me at most, would get it right. Also if you insist on using meta on someone you have rarely played with, I suggest you read my previous games and enlighten yourself so I can actually take you seriously rather than pretend that you know wtf you are talking about.
|
On April 07 2013 00:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Didnt see that.
Scib didnt post anything in the period I was on last night. Get your details right. So when marv asked me why I thought Scib was scum, NOTHING CHANGED.
Except there is more than one person in the thread so if there was no additional information on one person there was surely more than a shitty case based on a start of game speculation post on another.
On April 07 2013 00:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Damn you missed SO much in my filter DP.
Intentionally? Or not?
The point of a case is not to quote your entire filter. WTF are you actually saying here? Aside from trying to discredit me without saying anything.
On April 07 2013 00:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Why is my flipflopping on Iamp scummy DP?
Flip flopping by it's very nature is a classic scm tell. But add to that that you made it seem like palmar was an idiot for not viewing IAMP, YOUR SCUM READ! as town makes no fucking sense from a town mindset.
On April 07 2013 00:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Also with the slightest bit of pressure, IE asking you to explain difference between town Iamp and this one. YOU DROP IT? What DP?
I don't use meta. But if you want to read my 'meta analysis' of Iamp it is in my filter. Also I had already dropped it at marv's request.
You are clearly scum. I refuse to engage with you further. I will discuss your lynch with townies.
|
On April 07 2013 00:15 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 00:14 Oatsmaster wrote: oh the frustration?
I dont know, again, this seems similar to personality 2 where he had a shitfest with Marv.
Guess what? He was scum there.
here he is frustrated about not being listened to i don t remember that in personality
Why don't you want to lynch oats. Please read his filter with an open mind if you have time.
|
On April 07 2013 00:32 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 00:26 DarthPunk wrote:On April 07 2013 00:15 iamperfection wrote:On April 07 2013 00:14 Oatsmaster wrote: oh the frustration?
I dont know, again, this seems similar to personality 2 where he had a shitfest with Marv.
Guess what? He was scum there.
here he is frustrated about not being listened to i don t remember that in personality Why don't you want to lynch oats. Please read his filter with an open mind if you have time. because i woud perfer killing prplhz, ace and wos wqell before him. oats has shown intrest in the lynch much rather kill those ppl
Yeah but the thing is he actually HASN'T shown interest in the lynch. Imagine if you had a solid scum read all game. SO solid that it had never changed. Wouldn't you push that lynch hard? Wouldn't you be screaming at the top of your lungs to lynch this scum? None of this occurs in Oats' filter. In fact much of his filter is useless comments on byplay/ trolling. He barely mentions sciberbia and hasn't actively pushed HIS TOP SCUM READ. It is patently obvious that oats does not, in fact, care about the lynch and this is DESPITE reasonable activity which is a lot worse than not caring about lynches when you are barely posting at all.
Please. THINK. oats is scum.
|
On April 07 2013 00:40 AxleGreaser wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 23:54 sciberbia wrote: Hey guys. I just have a few minutes.
Axle, I don't have any questions for you. I don't think anything you posted was scummy.
Palmar/marv you are wrong about my alignment. I'm busy today but in 7 or 8 hours from now I can sit down and have a chat.
I also don't know why you think I'm scum with WoS. I'm thinking town on WoS if you couldn't tell from my posts earlier. For lack of time, I'll just post my notes:
2) WaveofShadow - claims town in first post when he knows it may draw attention - draws attention by making multi-line posts and not spamming - in and out of thread - huge-ass post for no reason - conspiracy theory (?) with Axle and Rayn - "you got me" post about his vote on Ace - philosophical problem with Ace/prplhz CONCLUSION: thinking town
Even though I think it was Marv that suggested it, I am not sure why WoS being scum would make you scum. It could do, but that is a preflip association case. My problem is even if WoS is town, scum know who is town and know they can defend them for the towny cred if they get flipped. ##vote Sciberbia
What the fuck is this?
For what reason EXACTLY are you voting sciberbia?
|
Ok if we lynch a lurker we lynch this guy plz.
|
On April 07 2013 00:44 Oatsmaster wrote: Damn I lost my post.
Summary.
Tone in jovial posts seems very similar to personality rather than THE GAME for DP.
I was wrong about the violent posting, I dont see it anywhere but I dont think its alignment indicative.
This is trash. I can link you to a game where I get mislynched for the same meta argument. You have no way near enough experience in games with me or with my meta for this to even be worthwhile. Add to that I have NEVER been correctly lynched with meta.
Also does it seem odd to any townies that Oats is clinging to some sort of meta read to prove I am scum? He is not making a case in the thread. And has now found that he couldn't make a meta case based on aggression jumped onto the complete opposite end of the spectrum to provide some weak as shit 'meta' reason to state I am playing more like scum than town.
|
Oats is making meta cases from ONE GAME we have played together. in which I replaced in day 2 and it was a themed large game. I mean honestly can anyone take this seriously and not want to lynch him?
|
Somehow this is not working??
##unvote: Iamperfection
##Vote: Oatsmaster
|
On April 07 2013 00:53 iamperfection wrote:your's was better
What is your opinion of oats' desperation to paint me as scum through meta after playing one game together in which i replaced in. And having a complete backflip on his meta case after actually reading the games.
Almost like he went SEARCHING for things to make me scummy. Rather than making an actual READ based on EVIDENCE.
Don't you agree?
|
On April 07 2013 00:55 iamperfection wrote: might want to kill axle now above all else his reasoning for voting for scrib is that he has none and he dosnt want to have a discourse with town Axle is my number 2 scum read. But we should lynch scum oats also.
|
Oats is scum. God this is frustrating. I am not going to drown the thread with spam when I am being ignored. Please read my posts on oats with an open mind.
I am off to bed. It's 3 am. I wouldn't expect axle to post again for ~8 hours. Australian timezone.
|
On April 07 2013 00:59 marvellosity wrote: Oats isn't scum.
You don't get to just say that marv. You are wrong all the time. So give me something other than that. It is insulting at the very least that I have put in a lot of time writing a strong case on a scummy player that you get to shut it down with three words.
|
|
|
|