EPTWos where did you claim?
Ego Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Wos where did you claim? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 07:18 Palmar wrote: @Ace just to clarify, by distraction you mean scum right? Or do you simply want to lynch Oats for being an asshole? both. I honestly think he will lessen the Town's chances of winning if kept around so he's Scum at best and Town at worst. In light of no better suspects imo outside of WoS (waiting to show me his claim) he is the best option. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
We've already pointed out WoS's day 1 behavior with his vote on me that he really didn't support even though it was when marv joke voted for me. Sciberbia summed it up pretty well, which is actually the reason a lynch on him doesn't make sense. He's actually moving the thread forward and trying to figure shit out (or putting up a great act in doing so). Unless I can see some rock solid analysis on him which currently doesn't exist I'm not hopping on that wagon. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote: it pretty clear that wos didn't claim anything ace shhhh.... | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 08:41 Palmar wrote: I don't know how you approach a situation Ace, but I generally assume most players are somewhat naive and straightforward until I know better, as I explained earlier, it requires some basic thread comprehension skills to pull what WoS pulled when under heavy pressure. He may be getting advice from someone of course, or he may just be a better player than expected, but for now I think the simple explanation is that WoS isn't scum and his reaction was genuine. So yes, it makes absolute sense to unvote WoS given the information I have. I also believe it's possible it really was a genuine reaction. Which is why I unvoted him and asked him that question to confirm my reasoning. However, where does the sciberbia vote come from? Can you explain that? If you believe that WoS is playing straightforward, then based on the information you have - why isn't sciberbia being afforded the same courtesy? Nothing in his play so far seem out of the ordinary so what stands out to you that warrants a vote? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 08:48 marvellosity wrote: WoS never claimed, you never had your vote on him, you didn't think he should be lynched at any point. Stop making shit up, Ace. herp derp so if WoS never claimed, and you know this why are you voting for sciberbia when you know someone else lied? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Marv quoted my post knowing I asked WoS to claim. Clearly he's been reading the thread and knows WoS said he did actually claim already. Hence, when Marv says "WoS never claimed" he knows WoS was lying. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
@marv: What else could "I already did" refer to? If I'm looking at this wrong then honestly, show me a different interpretation. @iamp: If he didn't have anything to claim then why would he say he already did? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
@marv: What is the case on sciberbia? Looks like Palmar is just moving votes and you sheeped him. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 09:31 DarthPunk wrote: I find the wagon on sciberbia really weird. And once again marv provides his filter as justification. outside of this WoS stuff and Oats he's actually the best lynch. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 09:42 marvellosity wrote: Saying there is "no way" sciberbia should be up for the lynch and "scum could be hiding in this silliness" does not equate to him being a decent lynch, which you just implied. "silliness" != 3rd best lynch. what? are you serious? How in the world did I just imply sciberbia is a decent lynch? Those quotes don't even have any relation to me saying you are the 3rd best lynch option. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Hence, he would be scum. Why are you ignoring his play even though you said you told him pregame what to fix? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 07 2013 09:48 DarthPunk wrote: Marv what exactly have you said to make sciberbia scum aside from associations with someone you just unvoted? Seems like you are trying to make an association case before the flip and the association is now with someone you are unwilling to lynch. So when you say to look in your filter for the reason behind your sciberbia vote with ZERO justification and all I find is the above quotes. I don't know What the fuck you are talking about. very good analysis here. | ||
| ||
