|
don't need to. it should be obvious.
|
all i know is that i'm going to a pick a role that will let me kill a certain two scum day 1
|
disagree cuz ive already sent in [1][1]
|
On April 05 2013 02:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 02:43 Vivax wrote:
It's ok caller, just means you will be the last one along with the designated elected townie mofo you'll contest. Hurt yourself bro.
I'll take a look at your options there. Seems like you like to pick the most active ones, but need to check if they're actually proposing malicious ideas. Disagreed on some stuff with sharrant, for example. It's like he wanted to leave "dangerous" roles open for scum. It doesn't matter if they proposed good or bad ideas. Mafia is probably not going to push any ideas at all (because they all have a backdoor - because there are so many roles). Everyone pushing ideas regardless if they are good/bad are probably town at this point, especially the guys who are pushing ultimately bad ideas. :D
au contraire mafia will push any ideas even if they are "good" because their picking strategy never reflects what town is thinking and if they have a "good plan" they become more "townlike." or they participate. either way it looks good on them.
|
wait how does vivax know there are five mafia
|
On April 05 2013 02:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 02:53 Caller wrote:
wait how does vivax know there are five mafia Elaborate plz?
in his plan he says mafia will match 3 townies and have 2 left over, so 5. how does he know there are 5 mafia?
|
|
|
On April 05 2013 02:59 geript wrote:
@Caller what do you think of my plan?
@All Would everyone be okay if I came up with a set of 5 pods of rolls and the pods to be selected from in specific picks? I'd expect some feedback and editing on them.
don't care about plans
fos keirathi
|
i think everybody should claim their numbers now. I will shoot anybody who fails to do so.
|
On April 05 2013 22:33 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:32 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:18 Caller wrote:
i think everybody should claim their numbers now. I will shoot anybody who fails to do so. Why don't you claim picking [6][1]? Wait, nvm, you picked the same first number as Snb, not me. all wrong
wait, how do you know all this?
|
On April 05 2013 22:45 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:42 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:33 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:32 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:18 Caller wrote:
i think everybody should claim their numbers now. I will shoot anybody who fails to do so. Why don't you claim picking [6][1]? Wait, nvm, you picked the same first number as Snb, not me. all wrong wait, how do you know all this? basic math and shit.
explain for idiots like me please
|
On April 05 2013 22:47 Mocsta wrote:
Caller; do you still think me/yam are scum?
why does it matter?
|
On April 05 2013 22:50 Restraining Order wrote:
This is roughly where it stands, I didn't dig through to get all the second numbers for the 8's and 11's, but those don't matter that much.
Sn0_man - 1, 1? could theoretically also be 2 or 3 I guess, but no reason to disbelieve it.
obviousone - 234?
Raynpelikoneet - 5, 1
Sinani206 - 7, 2
Visceraeyes - 10, 10
Geript - something huge, 18, 12? can't remember
strongandbig - 234? same first as caller
Caller - 234? same first as snb, larger second
restraining order - 6, 2
Meapak_ziphh - 6, 3+
artanis[xp] - 11
sharrant - 11
gonzaw - 8
Austinmcc - 8
Keirathi - 8
Palmar - 8
Mocsta - 8
Shelvocke - 8
Deconduo - 8
Vivax - 8, 1
Oatmaster - 8, 1
billmurray - either 8 or didn't send
Yamato77 - not sent, tried 11
couldn't snb have picked 19 or 20? and meapak would have picked 11, no?
|
On April 05 2013 22:53 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:50 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:47 Mocsta wrote:
Caller; do you still think me/yam are scum? why does it matter? Cos thats been your piece de resistance for contributions thus far.
that's nice
|
On April 05 2013 22:57 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 22:54 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:50 Restraining Order wrote:
This is roughly where it stands, I didn't dig through to get all the second numbers for the 8's and 11's, but those don't matter that much.
Sn0_man - 1, 1? could theoretically also be 2 or 3 I guess, but no reason to disbelieve it.
obviousone - 234?
Raynpelikoneet - 5, 1
Sinani206 - 7, 2
Visceraeyes - 10, 10
Geript - something huge, 18, 12? can't remember
strongandbig - 234? same first as caller
Caller - 234? same first as snb, larger second
restraining order - 6, 2
Meapak_ziphh - 6, 3+
artanis[xp] - 11
sharrant - 11
gonzaw - 8
Austinmcc - 8
Keirathi - 8
Palmar - 8
Mocsta - 8
Shelvocke - 8
Deconduo - 8
Vivax - 8, 1
Oatmaster - 8, 1
billmurray - either 8 or didn't send
Yamato77 - not sent, tried 11 couldn't snb have picked 19 or 20? and meapak would have picked 11, no? Yeah. You could also both be [1, 1], sno, 2 or 3, obvious 3 or 4. etc etc. Not enough claims to make the list 100% foolproof true.
you seem awfully sure meapakk was 6 tho
|
On April 05 2013 23:05 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 23:03 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:57 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:54 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:50 Restraining Order wrote:
This is roughly where it stands, I didn't dig through to get all the second numbers for the 8's and 11's, but those don't matter that much.
Sn0_man - 1, 1? could theoretically also be 2 or 3 I guess, but no reason to disbelieve it.
obviousone - 234?
Raynpelikoneet - 5, 1
Sinani206 - 7, 2
Visceraeyes - 10, 10
Geript - something huge, 18, 12? can't remember
strongandbig - 234? same first as caller
Caller - 234? same first as snb, larger second
restraining order - 6, 2
Meapak_ziphh - 6, 3+
artanis[xp] - 11
sharrant - 11
gonzaw - 8
Austinmcc - 8
Keirathi - 8
Palmar - 8
Mocsta - 8
Shelvocke - 8
Deconduo - 8
Vivax - 8, 1
Oatmaster - 8, 1
billmurray - either 8 or didn't send
Yamato77 - not sent, tried 11 couldn't snb have picked 19 or 20? and meapak would have picked 11, no? Yeah. You could also both be [1, 1], sno, 2 or 3, obvious 3 or 4. etc etc. Not enough claims to make the list 100% foolproof true. you seem awfully sure meapakk was 6 tho You seem awfully unwilling to say what you picked yourself.
because its more fun this way
answer the question tho
and other people better claim numbers before i start shooting.
|
On April 05 2013 23:15 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 23:14 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 23:05 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 23:03 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:57 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:54 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:50 Restraining Order wrote:
This is roughly where it stands, I didn't dig through to get all the second numbers for the 8's and 11's, but those don't matter that much.
Sn0_man - 1, 1? could theoretically also be 2 or 3 I guess, but no reason to disbelieve it.
obviousone - 234?
Raynpelikoneet - 5, 1
Sinani206 - 7, 2
Visceraeyes - 10, 10
Geript - something huge, 18, 12? can't remember
strongandbig - 234? same first as caller
Caller - 234? same first as snb, larger second
restraining order - 6, 2
Meapak_ziphh - 6, 3+
artanis[xp] - 11
sharrant - 11
gonzaw - 8
Austinmcc - 8
Keirathi - 8
Palmar - 8
Mocsta - 8
Shelvocke - 8
Deconduo - 8
Vivax - 8, 1
Oatmaster - 8, 1
billmurray - either 8 or didn't send
Yamato77 - not sent, tried 11 couldn't snb have picked 19 or 20? and meapak would have picked 11, no? Yeah. You could also both be [1, 1], sno, 2 or 3, obvious 3 or 4. etc etc. Not enough claims to make the list 100% foolproof true. you seem awfully sure meapakk was 6 tho You seem awfully unwilling to say what you picked yourself. because its more fun this way answer the question tho and other people better claim numbers before i start shooting. What is there to answer? I said it's not a 100% list and only a rough outline twice now, I don't think saying it a third time will fare any better, but I suppose I just did say it a third time, so there you go. Have fun shooting yourself.
So why don't you repost that list with my suggested correction, no? ^_^
|
On April 05 2013 23:23 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 23:17 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 23:15 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 23:14 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 23:05 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 23:03 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:57 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:54 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:50 Restraining Order wrote:
This is roughly where it stands, I didn't dig through to get all the second numbers for the 8's and 11's, but those don't matter that much.
Sn0_man - 1, 1? could theoretically also be 2 or 3 I guess, but no reason to disbelieve it.
obviousone - 234?
Raynpelikoneet - 5, 1
Sinani206 - 7, 2
Visceraeyes - 10, 10
Geript - something huge, 18, 12? can't remember
strongandbig - 234? same first as caller
Caller - 234? same first as snb, larger second
restraining order - 6, 2
Meapak_ziphh - 6, 3+
artanis[xp] - 11
sharrant - 11
gonzaw - 8
Austinmcc - 8
Keirathi - 8
Palmar - 8
Mocsta - 8
Shelvocke - 8
Deconduo - 8
Vivax - 8, 1
Oatmaster - 8, 1
billmurray - either 8 or didn't send
Yamato77 - not sent, tried 11 couldn't snb have picked 19 or 20? and meapak would have picked 11, no? Yeah. You could also both be [1, 1], sno, 2 or 3, obvious 3 or 4. etc etc. Not enough claims to make the list 100% foolproof true. you seem awfully sure meapakk was 6 tho You seem awfully unwilling to say what you picked yourself. because its more fun this way answer the question tho and other people better claim numbers before i start shooting. What is there to answer? I said it's not a 100% list and only a rough outline twice now, I don't think saying it a third time will fare any better, but I suppose I just did say it a third time, so there you go. Have fun shooting yourself. So why don't you repost that list with my suggested correction, no? ^_^ Because that would in no way be more likely to be accurate. If you want to say you picked 6, say you picked 6.
why would it not be as accurate? you just said its not 100%. so my version is just as valid, no? just post my suggestion, please. I would like it to be there as I feel it is just as valid as your previous theory, assuming your assumptions are true.
im also too lazy to do it myself. not gonna claim yet tho ^_^
|
On April 05 2013 23:26 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 23:25 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 23:23 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 23:17 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 23:15 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 23:14 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 23:05 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 23:03 Caller wrote:On April 05 2013 22:57 Restraining Order wrote:On April 05 2013 22:54 Caller wrote:
[quote]
couldn't snb have picked 19 or 20? and meapak would have picked 11, no? Yeah. You could also both be [1, 1], sno, 2 or 3, obvious 3 or 4. etc etc. Not enough claims to make the list 100% foolproof true. you seem awfully sure meapakk was 6 tho You seem awfully unwilling to say what you picked yourself. because its more fun this way answer the question tho and other people better claim numbers before i start shooting. What is there to answer? I said it's not a 100% list and only a rough outline twice now, I don't think saying it a third time will fare any better, but I suppose I just did say it a third time, so there you go. Have fun shooting yourself. So why don't you repost that list with my suggested correction, no? ^_^ Because that would in no way be more likely to be accurate. If you want to say you picked 6, say you picked 6. why would it not be as accurate? you just said its not 100%. so my version is just as valid, no? just post my suggestion, please. I would like it to be there as I feel it is just as valid as your previous theory, assuming your assumptions are true. im also too lazy to do it myself. not gonna claim yet tho ^_^ How about no.
i'll shoot you if you don't
|
seriously why won't you do it it'll take all of five seconds. be honest, why are you so scared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
