RED Team's Prize - Page 5

On March 28 2013 06:58 Hapahauli wrote:


What's your point?

On March 28 2013 07:01 cDgCorazon wrote:
Good thing he flipped town because now I can confidently say that Marv has no clue what he is doing.

On March 28 2013 07:30 Keirathi wrote:

Looking back through your filter, did you really use "Keir is saying ':o; a bunch" as evidence of me being scum?

Like, I talk to you on IRC quite often. I always use stupid emoticons. How was that even relevant AT ALL? Would be like me calling you scum for saying 'dear'.

On March 28 2013 07:35 Keirathi wrote:

You know better than to make stupid ass arguments like that. What gives?

On March 28 2013 04:59 ObviousOne wrote:
Just woke up and caught up.

If it's between Kei and Sinani I'll go with the former

Keirathi laughed off my suspicions of him early game and I thought that was related to a conversation we had pre-game where he told me to make silly cases. His response was "I've created a monster" and to me it looked like he was simply laughing it off in an offhandedly way -- as if my suspicions were just completely unfounded and terribly reasoned -- which later convinced me to drop it when nobody really commented on it.

As for Sinani I'm okay with lynching him based on participation level this game, the meta stuff doesn't fascinate me too terribly much in his case when I can barely remember he's even playing the game.

Again, I want to lynch Keirathi over Sinani.

On March 28 2013 15:13 Keirathi wrote:
And, OO, since you're here:

You were so willing to hop on my bandwagon because I laughed off your post about me earlier in the game. Why did you run off and leave the thread instead of engaging me and trying to actually figure out if I was scum or not?

For reference:



You just completely ignored me. That doesn't seem like someone who cares if the person they are voting for is town or not.

On March 28 2013 15:44 Keirathi wrote:
No, you're right. Saying "I've created a monster" was totally a reference to our pre-game conversations. I thought you would realize that I was implying that I thought your points were bullshit.

But, that's not what I'm asking. When the wagon started rolling on me, you just sheeped your old bogus read because I didn't respond to it. But, I did give a response when you said thats why you were sheeping onto me. A response that you could have easily validated for yourself by looking back at Hydra (and maybe asking me which posts were mine and which were marv's, since I tended not to sign my posts like...ever...and marv forgot sometimes too). I refuted your entire reasoning for jumping on my wagon, but you didn't reconsider your vote nor even talk with me and tell me why I was wrong.

On March 28 2013 16:03 Keirathi wrote:
You are wildly blowing my read of prplhz out of proportion. Maybe that's because you drew me into an argument so I started replying to specific things instead of general things, but prplhz in its simplest form is: town prplhz cares about town, scum prplhz doesn't. I've PLAYED scum with prplhz. I even went back and looked through our irc logs. He told me multiple times that he wasn't even reading the thread, and all of his cases/pushes were just made up.

(Also your "policy lynch" thing is bullshit. Scum prplhz didn't propose a policy lynch in GSL 1. But again, meta isn't about specifics. Its about broad playstyle similarities/difference.)

On March 28 2013 16:11 Keirathi wrote:

That is just patently false. And you wonder why I question your 100% townread on prplhz. :o